DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyrrole-Based Copolymers as Donor Materials for Organic Photovoltaics

  • Song, Suhee (Department of Chemistry and Chemistry Institute for Functional Materials, Pusan National University) ;
  • Ko, Seo-Jin (Interdisciplinary School of Green Energy, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Shin, Hyunmin (Department of Chemistry and Chemistry Institute for Functional Materials, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jin, Youngeup (Department of Industrial Chemistry, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Kim, Il (The WCU Center for Synthetic Polymer Bioconjugate Hybrid Materials, Department of Polymer Science and Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Jin Young (Interdisciplinary School of Green Energy, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Suh, Hongsuk (Department of Chemistry and Chemistry Institute for Functional Materials, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2013.06.07
  • Accepted : 2013.08.30
  • Published : 2013.11.20

Abstract

A new accepter unit, pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyrrole-2,5-dione, was prepared and utilized for the synthesis of the conjugated polymers containing electron donor-acceptor pair for OPVs. Pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyrrole-2,5-dione unit, regioisomer of the known pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-1,4-dione, is originated from the structure of stable synthetic pigment. The new conjugated polymers with 1,4-diphenylpyrrolo[3,2-b]pyrrole-2,5-dione, thiophene and carbazole were synthesized using Suzuki polymerization to generate P1 and P2. The solid films of P1 and P2 show absorption bands with maximum peaks at about 377, 554 and 374, 542 nm and the absorption onsets at 670 and 674 nm, corresponding to band gaps of 1.85 and 1.84 eV, respectively. To improve the hole mobility of the polymer with 1,4-bis(4-butylphenyl)-pyrrolo[3,2-b]-pyrrole-2,5-dione unit, which was previously reported by us, the butyl group at the 4-positions of the N-substituted phenyl group was substituted with hydrogen and methyl group. The field-effect hole mobility of P2 is $9.6{\times}10^{-5}cm^2/Vs$. The device with $P2:PC_{71}BM$ (1:2) showed $V_{OC}$ value of 0.84 V, $J_{SC}$ value of 5.10 $mA/cm^2$, and FF of 0.33, giving PCE of 1.42%.

Keywords

Introduction

In recent years, the development of efficient polymerbased solar cells has become an active area of research due to their potential as alternative source of green energy.1-3 Organic photovoltaics (OPVs) with bulk heterojunction (BHJ) architecture have attracted substantial attentions due to its possibility to be renewable clean energy for low-cost, lightweight, printable, and flexible large area devices.45 Conjugated polymers as the donor with the fullerene derivative PCBM as the acceptor have achieved impressive values of power conversion efficiency (PCE) near 8%6 to ≥ 10%7 in bulk heterojunction (BHJ) devices.67

To obtain low bandgap conjugated polymers with planar molecular geometries, various types of aromatic heterocycles have been widely investigated in OPVs.8-10 Semiconducting copolymers with diketopyrrolopyrrole units are emerging as interesting materials for optoelectronic applications in fieldeffect transistors (FETs)11 and organic photovoltaic cells.12 The pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-1,4-dione (DPP) chromophore has been primarily known in commercial high-performance pigments with heat stability and high and balanced hole and electron mobilities for optoelectronic applications. The DPP unit constitutes a planar moiety capable of providing 𝜋-𝜋 stacking in the solid state to generate efficient charge transport.13 The pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyrrole-2,5-dione (iDPP) exhibiting absorption in the near IR range, the structure of a natural dye found in lichens,14 is the regioisomer of the known DPP which has been used as the electron rich unit.15 In our previous study, new electron deficient unit, 1,4-bis(4- butylphenyl)-pyrrolo[3,2-b]-pyrrole-2,5-dione, has been designed and utilized for the efficient ICT to generate polymer with low band gap.16

In this paper, we reported the synthesis and characterization of polymers with iDPP for OPV device. At the 4- positions of the N-substituted phenyl groups of 1,4-bis(4- butylphenyl)-pyrrolo[3,2-b]-pyrrole-2,5-dione unit, the butyl group was substituted with hydrogen or methyl group to improve the hole mobility. The low bandgap conjugated polymers were synthesized by Suzuki coupling reaction of iDPP as the electron poor unit and carbazole as the electron rich unit with thiophene as the bridge. The photovoltaic properties of the polymers were investigated by fabrication of the polymer solar cells with the configuration of ITO/ PEDOT:PSS/polymer:PCBM/Al.

 

Results and Discussion

Synthesis and Characterization. The general synthetic routes of the monomers and polymers are outlined in Scheme 1. In the first step, ethyl 2-thiopheneacetate (1) was brominated with N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) to generate ethyl 2-(5-bromo-2-thienyl)acetate (2). The aniline (3) and p-toluidine (4) were treated with oxalyl chloride (6) and PCl5 in toluene to provide diphenylethanediimidoyl dichloride (6) and N,N'-bis(4-methylphenyl)ethanediimidoyl dichloride (7), respectively. Ethyl 2-(5-bromo-2-thienyl)acetate (2) and compound 6 (or compound 7) were coupled using Na[N(SiMe3)2] to form 3,6-bis{5-[4-(diphenylamino)phenyl]- 2-thienyl}-1,4-diphenylpyrrolo[3,2-b]pyrrole-2,5-dione (8) (or 3,6-bis{5-[4-(diphenylamino)phenyl]-2-thienyl}-1,4- bis(4-methylphenyl)pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyrrole-2,5-dione (9)). Compound 8 (or compound 9), as electron-accepting moiety, and 2,7-bis(4',4',5',5'-tetramethyl-1',3',2'-dioxaborolan-2'- yl)-N-9''-heptadecanylcarbazole (10),10 as electron-donating unit, were co-polymerized through Suzuki coupling reaction with Pd(0)-catalyst to yield poly(N-9-heptadecanyl-2,7- carbazole-alt-3,6-bis{5-[4-(diphenylamino)phenyl]-2-thienyl}- 1,4-diphenylpyrrolo[3,2-b]pyrrole-2,5-dione) (P1) (or poly(N-9-heptadecanyl-2,7-carbazole-alt-3,6-bis{5-[4-(diphenylamino) phenyl]-2-thienyl}-1,4-bis(4-methylphenyl)- pyrrolo[3,2-b] pyrrole-2,5-dione) (P2)). The structures and purities of the monomers were confirmed by 1H-NMR, 13CNMR, and HRMS. The synthesized polymers were soluble in various organic solvents such as chloroform, chlorobenzene, tetrahydrofuran (THF), dichloromethane and o-dichlorobenzene (ODCB).

Scheme 1.Synthetic route for the synthesis of the monomer and polymer.

Table 1.aMolecular weight (Mw) and polydispersity (PDI) of the polymers were determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) in THF using polystyrene standards. bOnset decomposition temperature (5% weight loss) measured by TGA under N2

Table 1 summarizes the polymerization results including molecular weight, polydispersity index (PDI) and thermal stability of the polymers. The weight-average molecular weight (Mw) of 16700 and 32800 with polydispersity index (PDI, Mw/Mn) value of 3.0 and 2.4 of the P1 and P2 were determined by gel permission chromatography (GPC), respectively. The thermal properties of the polymers were characterized by both differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA). TGA was performed with TGA 2950 in a nitrogen atmosphere at a heating rate of 10 ℃/min to 600 ℃. The DSC analysis was performed under a nitrogen atmosphere (50 mL/min) on a DSC 2920 at heating rate of 10 ℃/min. The decomposition temperatures (Td, 5% weight loss) are 407 and 388 ℃ for P1 and P2 under N2. The Td value of P1 is higher than that of P2 with two methyl groups introduced at 4-positions of the N-substituted phenyl groups. The P1 and P2 showed good thermal stability with glass transition temperature (Tg) values of 116 and 95 ℃, using DSC performed at a temperature range of 30 to 200 ℃. The Tg value of P1 is higher than that of P2 caused by crystallinity coming from the removal of the methyl groups. The high thermal stability of the resulting polymers prevents the deformation of the polymer morphology and is important for organic photovoltaics (OPVs) application.

Figure 1.UV-visible absorption spectra of polymer in chloroform solution and the solid state.

Optical Properties. The optical properties of chloroform solution and films of the polymers were investigated by UVvis absorption spectroscopy as shown in Figure 1. Uniform films were prepared on quartz plate by spin-casting from their chloroform solution at room temperature. The absorption spectra of P1 and P2 exhibited maximum peaks at about 352, 540 and 367, 541 nm in solution, respectively. The short wavelength absorption peak of P1 in solution was blue shifted about 16 nm as compared with that of the polymer based on pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyrrole-2,5-dione (iDPP) with butyl chains (P-Butyl)16 caused by lower molecular weight. The solid films of P1 and P2 show absorption bands with maximum peaks at about 377, 554 and 374, 542 nm and the absorption onsets at 670 and 674 nm, corresponding to band gaps of 1.85 and 1.84 eV, respectively. The absorption peaks of P1 in film were red shifted as compared with the case of P-Butyl because the alkyl chain, which prevent 𝜋-𝜋*stacking of the polymer backbone, was removed. In both cases of P1 and P2, the short wavelength absorption maxima and the absorption onsets of the films were red shifted as compared to the solution state. The long wavelength absorption peaks of the films show higher fwhm (full width at half maximum) as compared to the cases of the solution state. The short-wavelength absorption peak has been ascribed to a delocalized excitonic 𝜋-𝜋* transition in the conjugated chain and the long-wavelength absorption peak attributed to the intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) between the carbazole and iDPP units.17

Electrochemical Properties. The electrochemical property of the polymer was determined from the bandgap estimated from the absorption onset wavelength, and the HOMO energy level which was estimated from the cyclic voltammetry (CV). The CV was performed with a solution of tetrabutylammonium tetrafluoroborate (Bu4NBF4) (0.10 M) in acetonitrile at a scan rate of 100 mV/s at room temperature under argon atmosphere. A platinum electrode (~0.05 cm2) coated with a thin polymer film was used as the working electrode. Pt wire and Ag/AgNO3 electrode were used as the counter electrode and reference electrode, respectively. The energy level of the Ag/AgNO3 reference electrode (calibrated by the Fc/Fc+ redox system) was 4.8 eV below the vacuum level.18 The CV spectra are shown in Figure 2, and the oxidation potentials derived from the onsets of electrochemical p-doping are summarized in Table 2. HOMO and LUMO levels were calculated according to the empirical formula (EHOMO = −([Eonset]ox + 4.8) eV) and (ELUMO = −([Eonset]red + 4.8) eV), respectively. The polymers, P1 and P2, exhibited the absorption onset wavelengths of 670 and 674 nm in solid thin films, which correspond to band gaps of 1.85 and 1.84 eV, respectively. The polymers exhibit irreversible processes in an oxidation scan. The oxidation onsets of the P1 and P2 were estimated to be 0.66 and 0.67 V, which correspond to HOMO energy levels of −5.46 and −5.47 eV, respectively. The reduction potential onsets of P1 and P2 are −1.26 and −1.15 V, which correspond to LUMO energy levels of −3.54 and −3.65 eV, respectively. The electrochemical bandgaps, calculated from cyclic voltammetry data, are about 1.92 and 1.82 eV.

Table 2.aOptical energy band gap was estimated from the onset wavelength of the optical absorption. bCalculated from the oxidation potentials. cCalculated from the reduction potentials. dOnset oxidation and reduction potential measured by cyclic voltammetry. eCalculated from the Eox and Ered.

Figure 2.Electrochemical properties of polymers.

FET and Photovoltaic Properties. The field-effect carrier mobilities of the polymers were measured by fabricating thin film field-effect transistors (FETs) using the top-contact geometry. Figure 3 shows the FET transfer characteristics of the polymer devices of the OTS-modified SiO2. Hole mobilities of the P1 and P2 were calculated from the transfer characteristics of the OFETs. To improve the hole mobility of the polymer with 1,4-bis(4-butylphenyl)-pyrrolo[3,2-b]- pyrrole-2,5-dione unit, which was previously reported by us, the butyl group at the 4-positions of the N-substituted phenyl group was substituted with hydrogen and methyl group to provide P1 and P2. The field-effect hole mobilities of P1 and P2 are 1.6 × 10−5 and 9.6 × 10−5 cm2/Vs, respectively. Through this modification, the mobility was increased in case of P2 but was decreased in case of P1 caused by its relatively poor solubility.

Figure 3.Transfer Characteristics of PCDTPPDB-based Topcontact OFETs.

Figure 4.Current density-potential characteristics of the polymer solar cell under the illumination of AM 1.5, 100 mW/cm2.

The OPVs were fabricated by spin-casting of ODCB solution of PCBM/polymers. All polymers were applied as donors into a conventional BHJ type OPV device with PC71BM as acceptor, which has been widely used for this purpose. Typical J-V characteristics of devices with the configuration of ITO/PEDOT:PSS (40 nm)/polymer:PC71BM (1:2) (80 nm)/without or with TiOx (10 nm)/Al (100 nm) under AM 1.5G irradiation (100 mW/cm2) are depicted in Figure 4. The photovoltaic parameters for all the polymers, including open circuit voltage (VOC), short circuit current density (JSC), fill factor (FF), and power conversion efficiency (PCE) are summarized in Table 3. The device of P1:PC71BM (1:2) showed VOC value of 0.65 V, JSC value of 4.23 mA/cm2, and FF of 0.34, giving PCE of 0.93%. The device with P2:PC71BM (1:2) showed VOC value of 0.84 V, JSC value of 5.10 mA/cm2, and FF of 0.33, giving PCE of 1.42%. In case of the devices with blending ratio of 1:2, the PCE values of the devices were increased caused by the increased current density. However, neither of the processes, using 1,8-diiodooctane (DIO) or thermal treatment, improved the performance in the devices based on the polymer:PCBM (1:2) blend. The incident photon to current efficiency (IPCE) spectra of the photovoltaic devices from polymer:PC71BM blends are presented in Figure 5. The IPCE spectra of the polymers show maxima of 17.3% at 550 nm for P1 and 30.5% at 380 nm for P2.

Table 3.ausing PC61BM. busing PC71BM.

Figure 5.IPCE curve of the polymer solar cells under the illumination of AM 1.5, 100 mW/cm2.

 

Conclusions

The polymers, P1 and P2 utilizing the acceptor unit, diphenylpyrrolo[3,2-b]pyrrole-2,5-dione, were synthesized to show good solubility at room temperature in organic solvents. Pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyrrole-2,5-dione unit, regioisomer of the known pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-1,4-dione, is originated from the structure of stable synthetic pigment. The solid films of P1 and P2 show absorption bands with maximum peaks at about 377, 554 and 374, 542 nm and the absorption onsets at 670 and 674 nm, corresponding to band gaps of 1.85 and 1.84 eV, respectively. The hole mobility of P2 is 9.6 × 10−5 cm2/Vs. The device with P2:PC71BM (1:2) showed VOC value of 0.84 V, JSC value of 5.10 mA/cm2, and FF of 0.33, giving PCE of 1.42%.

 

Experimental Section

General. All reagents were purchased from Aldrich or TCI, and used without further purification. Solvents were purified by normal procedure and handled under moisture-free atmosphere. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded with a Varian Gemini-300 (300 MHz) spectrometer and chemical shifts were recorded in ppm units with TMS as the internal standard. Flash column chromatography was performed with Merck silica gel 60 (particle size 230-400 mesh ASTM) with ethyl acetate/hexane or methanol/methylene chloride gradients unless otherwise indicated. Analytical thin layer chromatography (TLC) was conducted using Merck 0.25 mm silica gel 60F pre-coated aluminum plates with fluorescent indicator UV254. High resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were recorded on a JEOL JMS-700 mass spectrometer under electron impact (EI) conditions in the Korea Basic Science Institute (Daegu). The UV-vis absorption spectra were recorded by a Varian 5E UV/VIS/NIR spectrophotometer, while the Oriel InstaSpec IV CCD detection system with xenon lamp was used for the photoluminescence and electroluminescence spectra measurements.

Solar cells were fabricated on an indium tin oxide (ITO)- coated glass substrate with the following structure; ITOcoated glass substrate/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT:PSS)/small molecule: PCBM/Al. The ITO-coated glass substrate was first cleaned with detergent, ultrasonicated in acetone and isopropyl alcohol, and subsequently dried overnight in an oven. PEDOT:PSS (Baytron PH) was spin-cast from aqueous solution to form a film of 40 nm thickness. The substrate was dried for 10 min at 140 ℃ in air and then transferred into a glove box to spin-cast the active layer. A solution containing a mixture of small molecule: PCBM in dichlorobenzene solvent with concentration of 7 wt %/mL was then spin-cast on top of the PEDOT/PSS layer. The film was dried for 60 min at 70 ℃ in the glove box. The sample was heated at 80 ℃ for 10 min in air. Then, an aluminum (Al, 100 nm) electrode was deposited by thermal evaporation in a vacuum of about 5 × 10−7 Torr. Current density-voltage (J-V) characteristics of the devices were measured using a Keithley 236 Source Measure Unit. Solar cell performance utilized an Air Mass 1.5 Global (AM 1.5 G) solar simulator with an irradiation intensity of 1000 W m2. An aperture (12.7 mm2) was used on top of the cell to eliminate extrinsic effects such as cross-talk, waveguiding, shadow effects, etc. The spectral mismatch factor was calculated by comparison of solar simulator spectrum with AM 1.5 spectrum at room temperature. The IPCE is a measure of the photon to electron conversion efficiency at a particular irradiation wavelength (Eq. 1).

Synthesis of Ethyl 2-(5-bromo-2-thienyl)acetate (2): Ethyl 2-thiopheneacetate (1) (10 g, 66.66 mmol) was brominated with N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) (13 g, 73.26 mmol) in THF (20 mL) at room temperature. After stirring for 24 h, water (200 mL) and ethyl acetate (400 mL) were added. The organic layer was washed with 3 × 200 mL of water and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography to give compound 2 as a yellow oil; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) 𝛿 1.29 (t, 3H, J = 7.1 Hz), 𝛿 3.76 (s, 2H), 𝛿 4.19 (q, 2H, J = 7.1 Hz ), 𝛿 6.69 d, 1H, J = 3.8 Hz), 𝛿 6.90 (d, 1H, J = 3.8 Hz); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 𝛿 14.35, 36.07, 61.59, 111.55, 127.31, 129.66, 137.09, 170.05; HRMS (EI+, m/z) calcd for C8H9BrO2S 247.9507, measured 247.9509.

Synthesis of Diphenylethanediimidoyl Dichloride (6): A solution of aniline (3) (54.82 mmol) and oxalyl chloride (5) (10.9 mL, 115 mmol) in toluene (50 mL) was treated with PCl5 (12.53 g, 60 mmol) at room temperature. After stirring for 30 min, the reaction mixture was heated at 100 ℃ until no further hydrogen chloride was formed. The reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and crude product was recrystallized from hexane/CH2Cl2 to afford compound 6 as a yellow crystal. mp 100 ℃; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) 𝛿 7.12 (d, 4H, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.29 (t, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz), 7.47 (t, 4H, J = 7.2 Hz); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 𝛿 120.67, 126.91, 129.28, 138.89, 146.03; HRMS (EI+, m/z) calcd for C14H10Cl2N2 276.0221, measured 276.0221.

Synthesis of N,N'-Bis(4-methylphenyl)ethanediimidoyl Dichloride (7): A solution of p-toluidine (4) (46.24 mmol) and oxalyl chloride (5) (9.3 mL, 98 mmol) in toluene (50 mL) was treated with PCl5 (11 g, 52 mmol) at room temperature. After stirring for 30 min, the reaction mixture was heated at 100 ℃ until no further hydrogen chloride was formed. The reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and crude product was recrystallized from hexane/ CH2Cl2 to afford compound 7 as a yellow crystal. mp 100 ℃; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) 𝛿 2.40 (s, 6H), 7.08 (d, 4H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.26 (d, 4H, J = 7.7 Hz); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 𝛿 21.42, 121.09, 129.79, 137.05, 138.07, 143.31; HRMS (EI+, m/z) calcd for C16H14Cl2N2 304.0534, measured 304.0531.

Synthesis of 3,6-Bis(5-(4-(diphenylamino)phenyl)-2- thienyl)-1,4-diphenylpyrrolo[3,2-b]pyrrole-2,5-dione (8): Ester 2 (33.23 mmol) and 1 M NaN(SiMe3)2 (144 mmol) was dissolved in THF (30 mL) at room temperature under argon. After stirring for 1 h, the reaction mixture was cooled to −78 ℃ and a THF solution (30 mL) of the compound 6 (15.75 mmol) was slowly added. After stirring for 48 h at room temperature, aqueous solution of NH4Cl (5 M, 250 mL) and ethyl acetate (400 mL) were added. The organic layer was washed with 3 × 200 mL of water and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography to give compound 8 as a red solid. mp 300 ℃; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) 𝛿 5.95 (d, 2H, J = 4.1 Hz), 𝛿 6.71 (d, 2H, J = 3.8 Hz), 𝛿 7.30-7.32 (m, 4H), 𝛿 7.45-7.48 (m, 6H); 13C NMR not obtained due to the low solubility; HRMS (EI+, m/z) calcd for C26H14Br2N2O2S2 607.8863, measured 607.8865.

Synthesis of 3,6-Bis(5-(4-(diphenylamino)phenyl)-2-thienyl)- 1,4-bis(4-methylphenyl)pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyrrole-2,5-dione (9): Ester 2 (23.12 mmol) and 1 M NaN(SiMe3)2 (98 mmol) was dissolved in THF (30 mL) at room temperature under argon. After stirring for 1 h, the reaction mixture was cooled to −78 ℃ and a THF solution (30 mL) of the compound 7 (10.56 mmol) was slowly added. After stirring for 48 h at room temperature, aqueous solution of NH4Cl (5 M, 250 mL) and ethyl acetate (400 mL) were added. The organic layer was washed with 3 × 200 mL of water and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography to give compound 9 as a red solid. mp 300 ℃; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) 𝛿 2.44 (s, 6H), 5.99 (d, 2H, J = 4.1 Hz), 6.72 (d, 2H, J = 4.1 Hz), 𝛿 7.18 (d, 4H, J = 8.5 Hz), 𝛿 7.26 (d, 4H, J = 6.3 Hz); 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) 𝛿 21.25, 100.18, 109.99, 110.00, 116.33, 126.97, 129.44, 129.79, 129.88, 130.75, 131.16, 138.78, 142.22, 170.04; HRMS (FAB, m/z) calcd for C28H19Br2N2O2S2 636.9255, measured 636.9255.

Synthesis of the Poly(N-9-heptadecanyl-2,7-carbazole-alt- 3,6-bis(5-(4-(diphenylamino)phenyl)-2-thienyl)-1,4- diphenylpyrrolo[3,2-b]pyrrole-2,5-dione) (P1): Carefully purified 3,6-bis{5-[4-(diphenylamino)phenyl]-2-thienyl}-1,4- diphenylpyrrolo[3,2-b]pyrrole-2,5-dione (8) (150 mg, 0.25 mmol), 2,7-bis(4',4',5',5'-tetramethyl-1',3',2'-dioxaborolan-2'-yl)- N-9''-heptadecanylcarbazole (10) (160 mg, 0.25 mmol), and (PPh3)4Pd(0) (3 mol %) were dissolved in a mixture of toluene and aqueous 2 M K2CO3. The mixture was refluxed with vigorous stirring for 3 days under argon atmosphere. After 72 h, phenylboronic acid was added to the reaction then 12 h later, bromobenzene was added and the reaction mixture refluxed overnight to complete the end-capping reaction. After cooling to room temperature, the mixture was poured into methanol. The precipitated material was recovered by filtration. The resulting solid material was reprecipitated using 100 mL of THF/1.0 L of methanol several times to remove residual amount of catalyst. The resulting polymer was soluble in THF, CHCl3, ODCB and toluene.

Synthesis of the Poly(N-9-heptadecanyl-2,7-carbazole-alt- 3,6-bis(5-(4-(diphenylamino)phenyl)-2-thienyl)-1,4- bis(4-methylphenyl)pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyrrole-2,5-dione) (P2): Carefully purified 3,6-bis{5-[4-(diphenylamino)phenyl]-2- thienyl}-1,4-bis(4-methylphenyl)pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyrrole-2,5- dione (9) (150 mg, 0.23 mmol), 2,7-bis(4',4',5',5'-tetramethyl- 1',3',2'-dioxaborolan-2'-yl)-N-9''-heptadecanylcarbazole (10) (150 mg, 0.23 mmol), and (PPh3)4Pd(0) (3 mol %) were dissolved in a mixture of toluene and aqueous 2 M K2CO3. The mixture was refluxed with vigorous stirring for 3 days under argon atmosphere. After 72 h, phenylboronic acid was added to the reaction then 12 h later, bromobenzene was added and the reaction mixture refluxed overnight to complete the end-capping reaction. After cooling to room temperature, the mixture was poured into methanol. The precipitated material was recovered by filtration. The resulting solid material was reprecipitated using 100 mL of THF/ 1.0 L of methanol several times to remove residual amount of catalyst. The resulting polymer was soluble in THF, CHCl3, ODCB and toluene.

References

  1. Son, H. J.; Wang, W.; Xu, T.; Liang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Li, G.; Yu, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 1885. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja108601g
  2. Song, S.; Jin, Y.; Park, S. H.; Cho, S.; Kim, I.; Lee, K.; Heeger, A. J.; Suh, H. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 6517. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0jm00772b
  3. Song, S.; Kim, J.; Shim, J.; Kim, J.; Lee, B. H.; Jin, Y.; Kim, I.; Lee, K.; Suh, H. Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C 2012, 98, 323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2011.11.037
  4. Duan, C.; Chen, K. S.; Huang, F.; Yip, H. L.; Liu, S.; Zhang, J.; Jen, A. K. Y.; Cao, Y. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 6444. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm1027157
  5. Helgesen, M.; Sondergaard, R.; Krebs, F. C. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 36. https://doi.org/10.1039/b913168j
  6. Dou, L.; You, J.; Yang, J.; Chen, C. C.; He, Y.; Murase, S.; Moriarty, T.; Emery, K.; Li, G.; Yang, Y. Nat. Photonics 2012, 6, 180. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2011.356
  7. Li, G.; Zhu, R.; Yang, Y. Polymer solar cells. Nat. Photonics 2012, 6, 153-161 .
  8. Park, S. H.; Roy, A.; Beaupre, S.; Cho, S.; Coates, N.; Moon, J. S.; Moses, D.; Leclerc, M.; Lee, K.; Heeger, A. J. Nat. Photonics 2009, 3, 297. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2009.69
  9. Song, S.; Jin, Y.; Kim, S. H.; Moon, J.; Kim, K.; Kim, J. Y.; Park, S. H.; Lee, K.; Suh, H. Macromolecules 2008, 41, 7296. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma801420e
  10. Blouin, N.; Michaud, A.; Leclerc, M. Adv. Mater. 2006, 19, 2295.
  11. Burgi, L.; Turbiez, M.; Pfeiffer, R.; Bienewald, F.; Kirner, H.-J.; Winnewisser, C. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 2217-2224. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200702775
  12. Bijleveld, J. C.; Gevaerts, V. S.; Nuzzo, D. D.; Turbiez, M.; Mathijssen, S. G. J.; de Leeuw, D. M.; Wienk, M. M.; Janssen, R. A. J. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, E242-E246. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201001449
  13. Kronemeijer, A. J.; Gili, E.; Shahid, M.; Rivnay, J.; Salleo, A.; Heeney, M.; Sirringhaus, H. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201104522
  14. Wuckelt, J.; Doring, M.; Langer, P.; Grrls, H.; Beckert, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4039(97)01148-9
  15. Langer, P.; Wuckelt, J.; Doring, M. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 729. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo991377u
  16. Song, S.; Ko, S. J.; Shin, H.; Jin, Y.; Kim, I.; Kim, J. Y.; Suh, H. Synth. Met. 2012, 162, 2288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2012.10.016
  17. Cho, S.; Seo, J. H.; Kim, S. H.; Song, S.; Jin, Y.; Lee, K.; Suh, H.; Heeger, A. J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93, 263301. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3059554
  18. Fang, Y. K.; Liu, C. L.; Yang, G. Y.; Chen, P. C.; Chen, W. C. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 2604. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma200187e