DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Antibacterial Activity of CNT-Ag and GO-Ag Nanocomposites Against Gram-negative and Gram-positive Bacteria

  • Yun, Hyosuk (Department of Chemistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Ji Dang (Department of Chemistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Choi, Hyun Chul (Department of Chemistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Chul Won (Department of Chemistry, Chonnam National University)
  • Received : 2013.07.04
  • Accepted : 2013.08.09
  • Published : 2013.11.20

Abstract

Carbon nanocomposites composed of carbon nanostructures and metal nanoparticles have become one of useful materials for various applications. Here we present the preparation and antibacterial activity of CNT-Ag and GO-Ag nanocomposites. Their physical properties were characterized by TEM, XPS, and Raman measurements, revealing that size-similar and quasi-spherical Ag nanoparticles were anchored to the surface of the CNT and GO. The antibacterial activities of CNT-Ag and GO-Ag were investigated using the growth curve method and minimal inhibitory concentrations against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. The antibacterial activities of the carbon nanocomposites were slightly different against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The proposed mechanism was discussed.

Keywords

Introduction

Antibiotic resistance is a serious and growing phen-omenon in public health and a big task in the field of pharmaceutical and medicine. Resistant pathogenic strains are emerging at a rate that far exceeds the speed of new antibiotic development. Therefore, the novel class of anti-biotics having different mechanism of action in comparison to existing antibiotics is urgently needed. In the research area of antibiotics, development or searching of the antimicrobial compounds having improved or distinct antibacterial activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) human pathogenic micro-bes is a primary intention.1

Nanotechnology has become an essential tool to develop the important properties of metal in the form of nano-particles utilized for medical applications including diagno-stics, drug delivery, biomarkers, and distinct antibacterial materials. In particular, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have been emerged as antimicrobial agents due to their high surface area to volume ratio and the unique physiochemical properties. Although the antibacterial mechanism of AgNPs is not fully understood, currently the great parts of the ap-plications of AgNPs are in antibacterial and antifungal agents.23 In spite of their high antibacterial activity, AgNPs is highly reactive and easily susceptible to aggregation into large particles due to their high surface energy of AgNPs, resulting in deterioration of their unique chemical properties and a loss of their antibacterial activities. Therefore many researchers have extensively studied various stable nano-composites composed of AgNPs dispersed on suitable sub-strates. 4-7

Carbon nanotube (CNT) and graphene oxide (GO) nano-structure possess outstanding properties and unique chemical architectures, which may serve as additive materials for the support of various metal nanoparticles. Recently several studies on the preparation, characterization, and antibacterial activities of carbon nanostructures combined with Ag nano-particles have been reported.8-12 While the carbon nano-composites are a promising alternative to overcome a variety of problems resulting from the nanoparticle itself, still there are some difficulties in preparation of suitable nano-composites. Antibacterial activities of silver nanocomposites depend on the size, shape and the degree of dispersion of AgNPs on the carbon nanostructures. We recently reported a simple and effective method for preparation of metal-sup-ported carbon materials using thiolated carbon nanostruc-tures, the samples observed in our experimentation having exhibited excellent catalytic activity in various organic and electrochemical reactions.13-16 In this study, we present the preparation and characterization of CNT-Ag and GO-Ag nanocomposites using deposition of Ag nanoparticles on a thiolated CNT and GO surfaces. In addition, we tested the antibacterial activity against both Gram-negative and Grampositive bacteria.

 

Experimental

Chemicals. Multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) were obtained from Carbon Nano Tech. Co., Ltd. (South Korea). Graphite powder (< 20 μm), potassium persulfate (K2S2O8, 99.99%), phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5, 99.99%), potassium permanganate (KMnO4, 99%), and silver nitrate (AgNO3, 99%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Other reagents were of analytical grade and were used as received without further purification. All aqueous solutions were prepared with Milli-Q water (> 18.2 MΩ·cm) using the Direct Q3 system (Millipore).

Preparation of CNT-Ag. The MWNTs were stirred in an acid solution of HNO3 and H2SO4 (1:3 by volume) at 90 °C for 3 h. They were then filtered, washed with distilled water (DI), and dried in an oven at 110 °C. To produce the thiol group, the acid-treated MWNTs were dispersed in THF, to which NaSH aqueous solution was added, and stirred at 50 °C for 12 h. The thiolation was confirmed by the XPS spectrum in the sulfur 2p region. Finally, the thiolated MWNTs (0.5 g) were dispersed in DI (15 mL), to which a 0.15 M AgNO3 solution (20 mL) was added under stirring. Subsequently, a 0.1 M NaOH solution was added and stirred for 20 h. The CNT-Ag product was obtained by centrifu-gation, washed with DI water, and then vacuum dried at 40 °C for 24 h.

Figure 1.(a) TEM image of CNT-Ag CNT with its corresponding EDS spectrum (inset). (b) TEM image of the GO-Ag CNT with its corresponding EDS spectrum (inset).

Preparation of GO-Ag. GO was prepared from graphite powder by the modified Hummers method.17 The obtained GO (0.5 g) and DI water (30 mL) were added to a bottle (250 mL) and ultrasonicated for 20 min. Next, NaSH (8 g) was added gradually with stirring, and the mixture was then ultrasonicated for 1 h at 40 °C. The resultant mixture was maintained under stirring for 20 h at 55 °C to produce thiol groups on the GO surfaces. The product was filtered and washed with DI water and dried under vacuum at 50 °C for 3 h. The thiolated GO powder (0.1 g) was dispersed in DI water (30 mL) by sonication for 30 min. A 0.1 M AgNO3 solution (0.5 mL) was then added to the GOSH solution under stirring. Subsequently, a 0.1 M NaOH solution was added under 20 h stirring. The GO-Ag product finally was obtained by centrifugation, washed with DI water, and then vacuum dried at 40 °C overnight.

Figure 2.(a) XPS survey spectra of pristine CNT, pristine GO, CNT-Ag, and GO-Ag. (b) Raman spectra of pristine CNT, graphite, CNT-Ag, and GO-Ag.

Characterization of CNT-Ag and GO-Ag. TEM images were obtained using a JEM-2200FS microscope operated at 200 kV. Samples for the TEM analysis were prepared on a gold grid by dip-coating in dilute solutions. The XPS measurements were performed at the 4D beam line of the Pohang Light Source (PLS). For analysis of the XPS peaks, the C 1s peak position was set as 284.5 eV and used as the internal reference for location of the other peaks. Raman spectra were obtained at 633 nm using a Jobin Yvon/HORIBA LabRam ARAMIS Raman spectrometer equipped with an integral BX 41 confocal microscope.

Growth Curves of Bacterial Cells Exposed to Silver Nanoparticles. To determine the growth curves of Gram-negative and Gram-positive cells exposed to Ag colloid. The bacterial cell concentration was adjusted to 4 × 108 CFU/mL and incubated in a shaking incubator up to 6 h at 37 °C. Growth curves of bacterial cell cultures were attained through measures of the optical density at 600 nm.

Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Measurements. The antibacterial activities of the silver nanocomposites were tested in sterile 96-well 200 mL plates as follows. Aliquots (100 mL) of the cell suspension at 4 × 106 CFU/mL in 1% peptone were added to 100 mL of the sample solutions (serial two-fold dilutions in 1% peptone). After incubation for 20 h at 37 °C, the MIC was determined by visual examinations on the basis of the lowest concentration of sample solution in cells with no bacterial growth. Two types of Gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus subtilis [KCTC 3068] and S. aureus [KCTC 1621]) and two types of Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli [KCTC 1682] and Salmonella typhimurium [KCTC 1926]) were procured from the Korean Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC) at the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology.

Figure 3.Growth curves of E. coli (a) and S. aureus (b) cells treated with different concentrations of silver nanoparticles.

Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FE-SEM). To directly observe the morphological changes of the bacterial cells after CNT-Ag treatment, FE-SEM was em-ployed. Bacterial cells (4 × 106 CFU/mL) were treated with 10 mg/mL of CNT-Ag for 3 h, and washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) 3 times and pre-fixed with 2% glutar-aldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde for 4 h. The pre-fixed cells were washed with 0.05 M cacodylate buffer three times and post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h. After washing with 0.05 M cacodylated buffer, dehydration process was conducted with 30, 50, 70, 90, 95, and 100% of ethanol. The fixed cell was dried and gold-coated using ion sputter. The pre-treated samples were observed by FE-SEM (JSM-7500F, JEOL, Japan).

 

Results and Discussion

Preparation and Characterization of CNT-Ag and GOAg. Figures 1(a) and (b) show typical TEM images of CNTAg and GO-Ag, which show clearly the presence of a large number of nanoparticles anchored to the surfaces of both samples. The adhered nanoparticles in the quasi-spherical morphology are uniformly dispersed on the surfaces of the CNT-Ag and GO-Ag. For both samples, most of the nanoparticle diameters ranged from 2 to 4 nm. The corresponding energy-dispersive X-ray (EDS) analysis showed that the species supported on the CNT-Ag and GO-Ag was Ag [Figs. 1(a) and (b), insets]. Figure 2(a) shows a series of XPS survey spectra from the pristine CNT, pristine GO, CNT-Ag and GO-Ag. For the pristine CNT and GO, the XPS data shows distinct C and O 1s peaks and no other elements are detected. However, after Ag deposition, the presence of Ag element is detected from the both samples. The relative surface atomic ratio was estimated from the corresponding peak areas, corrected with the tabulated sensitivity factors. The estimated value of the Ag content is 3.4 and 6.4 atomic %, respectively, for CNT-Ag and GO-Ag. Raman spectroscopy was used to obtain information on the average crystallinities of CNT-Ag and GO-Ag. As shown in Figure 2(b), the spectrum consisted of two bands at ~1330 cm–1 (D band) and 1570 cm–1 (G band). The integrated intensity ratio of the D band to the G band (ID/IG) had a linear relation to the inverse of the in-plane crystallite dimension. The ID/IG values were approximately 1.42, 0.21, 1.70, and 1.12 for the pristine CNT, graphite, CNT-Ag, and GO-Ag, respectively.

Table 1.Summary of minimal inhibitory concentration (mg/mL) against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria

Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanocomposites. The antibacterial activities of silver nanocomposites were investi-gated by determining bacterial growth rate and minimal inhibitory concentration with a Gram-negative bacterium E. coli and a Gram-positive bacterium S. aureus. To measure the growth rate of bacteria, cells were cultured in LB broth with Ag colloid, CNT-Ag, and GO-Ag, and the results were determined by optical density (OD) measurements at 600 nm. However, since CNT and GO displayed very high optical density at 600 nm, we obtained reliable growth curves with only Ag colloid and shown in Figure 3. With 10 mg/mL concentration, Ag colloid completely inhibited bacteria cell growth of both Gram-negative E. coli and Gram-positive S. aureus, but there were no effects with 0.1 mg/mL concentration of Ag colloid. In order to obtain more comprehensive antibacterial activities of the nanocomposites and the lowest concentration that completely inhibit cell growth, we measured the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the nanocomposites against two different species of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria (Table 1). The results clearly indicate that the MIC values of Gram-negative bacteria were lower than those of Gram-positive bacteria for Ag colloid, CNT-Ag and GO-Ag nanocomposites. These data may result from the distinct structure of cell wall between Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. The cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria is composed of thin peptidoglycan layer (7-8 nm) with additional an outer membrane. In contrast, Gram-positive bacteria contain a thick peptidoglycan layer (20-80 nm) in the outside the cell wall without an outer membrane. Peptidoglycan is a mesh-like polymer consisting of sugars and amino acids. The thick peptidoglycan of Gram-positive bacteria may also include other components such as teichoic and lipoteichoic acids and complex polysaccharides, which serve to act as chelating agents and also for certain types of adherence. Therefore, peptidoglycan layer protects against antibacterial agents such as antibiotics, toxins, chemical, and degradative enzymes. In present study, the antibacterial activities of the silver nanocomposites were lower against Gram-positive bacteria than Gram-negative bacteria. Several previous reports also showed that Gram-positive bacteria have slightly higher resistance to silver antibacterial agents than Gram-negative bacteria.1819 The MIC value of CNT-Ag was lower than those of other silver nanocomposites against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria with an exception for Salmonella, which showed similar effects to all nanocompo-sites. High antibacterial activity of CNT-Ag may result from the good dispersion of the Ag nanoparticles on the CNT and great water-dispersion property compared to GO nanostruc-ture. Morphological changes of E. coli cells by CNT-Ag were studied using FE-SEM (Fig. 4). The untreated cells of were typically rod-shaped and the cell surface was intact (Fig. 4(a)). However, in CNT-Ag treated cells, severe frag-mentations were observed (Fig. 4(b)). The mechanisms of antibacterial activities of Ag nanoparticles have been parti-ally known. Ag nanoparticles may attack the bacterial membrane, leading to changing of the permeability of the membranes, leakage of reducing sugars and proteins and inactivation of the respiratory chain dehydrogenases.1819 Ag nanoparticles also induce pits and gaps in the bacterial membrane and the cell membrane was fragmentary.20 Several researchers suggested that free-radicals or Ag ions produced by Ag nanoparticles attack outer bacterial membrane or peptidoglycan layer and then induce irregular fragmenta-tions of the bacterial cells.21 We also verified the effect of oxidized Ag species on the antibacterial activity. GO-Ag(I) oxidized by H2O2 contains around 50% Ag(I) on the surface of Ag nanoparticles attached to GO.13 Interestingly, the anti-bacterial activity of GO-Ag(I) was reduced up to 16-folds compared to GO-Ag by the MIC test (Table 1). One possible mechanism is that the productions of free-radicals or Ag ions by GO-Ag(I) are reduced by oxidation of Ag and then decrease the antibacterial activity.

Figure 4.FE-SEM micrograph of E. coli before (a) and after (b) exposure to CNT-Ag nanocomposites.

 

Conclusion

We have introduced Ag nanoparticles on to CNTs and GOs by surface thiolation. These synthetic CNT-Ag and GO-Ag showed slightly higher antibacterial activities against Gram-negative than Gram-positive bacteria. The antibacterial activity of CNT-Ag was the highest in both Gram-negative and positive bacteria, suggesting that CNT-Ag is a promising antibacterial agent for broad range of antibiotics.

References

  1. Lara, H. H.; Ayala-Nunez, N. V.; Turrent, L. D. I.; Padilla, C. R. World J. Microb. Biot. 2010, 26, 615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-009-0211-3
  2. Seil, J. T.; Webster, T. J. Int. J. Nanomedicine 2012, 7, 2767.
  3. Rai, M. K.; Deshmukh, S. D.; Ingle, A. P.; Gade, A. K. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 112, 841. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05253.x
  4. Roy, B.; Bharali, P.; Konwar, B. K.; Karak, N. Bioresource Technology 2013, 127, 175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.129
  5. Angelova, T.; Rangelova, N.; Yuryev, R.; Georgieva, N.; Muller, R. Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Mater. 2012, 32, 1241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2012.03.015
  6. Cao, X. L.; Tang, M.; Liu, F.; Nie, Y. Y.; Zhao, C. S. Colloid. Surface B 2010, 81, 555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.07.057
  7. Zhang, Y.; Zhong, S. L.; Zhang, M. S.; Lin, Y. C. J. of Mater. Sci. 2009, 44, 457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-3129-5
  8. Tai, Z. X.; Ma, H. B.; Liu, B.; Yan, X. B.; Xue, Q. J. Colloid. Surface B 2012, 89, 147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.09.006
  9. Liu, X.; Yu, L. M.; Liu, F.; Sheng, L. M.; An, K.; Chen, H. X.; Zhao, X. L. J. Mater. Sci. 2012, 47, 6086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6523-y
  10. Ma, J. Z.; Zhang, J. T.; Xiong, Z. G.; Yong, Y.; Zhao, X. S. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 3350. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0jm02806a
  11. Li, Z. Z.; Fan, L. J.; Zhang, T.; Li, K. J. Hazard Mater. 2011, 187, 466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.050
  12. Das, M. R.; Sarma, R. K.; Saikia, R.; Kale, V. S.; Shelke, M. V.; Sengupta, P. Colloid. Surface. B 2011, 83, 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.10.033
  13. Kim, J. D.; Palani, T.; Kumar, M. R.; Lee, S. W.; Choi, H. C. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 20665. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm35512d
  14. Jeong, Y. N.; Choi, M. Y.; Choi, H. C. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 60, 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2011.11.035
  15. Kim, J. Y.; Park, K.; Bae, S. Y.; Kim, G. C.; Lee, S.; Choi, H. C. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 5999. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0jm03467c
  16. Kim, J. Y.; Jo, Y.; Lee, S.; Choi, H. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 6290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.08.121
  17. Kovtyukhova, N. I.; Ollivier, P. J.; Martin, B. R.; Mallouk, T. E.; Chizhik, S. A.; Buzaneva, E. V.; Gorchinskiy, A. D. Chem. Mater. 1999, 11, 771. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm981085u
  18. Jung, W. K.; Koo, H. C.; Kim, K. W.; Shin, S.; Kim, S. H.; Park, Y. H. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2008, 74, 2171. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02001-07
  19. Feng, Q. L.; Wu, J.; Chen, G. Q.; Cui, F. Z.; Kim, T. N.; Kim, J. O. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2000, 52, 662. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(20001215)52:4<662::AID-JBM10>3.0.CO;2-3
  20. Amro, N. A.; Kotra, L. P.; Wadu-Mesthrige, K.; Bulychev, A.; Mobashery, S.; Liu, G. Y. Langmuir 2000, 16, 2789. https://doi.org/10.1021/la991013x
  21. Pellieux, C.; Dewilde, A.; Pierlot, C.; Aubry, J. M. Method Enzymol. 2000, 319, 197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(00)19020-2

Cited by

  1. Antimicrobial Food Equipment Coatings: Applications and Challenges vol.6, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-food-022814-015453
  2. Dioxygen Reduction by Nitrogen-Rich Mesoporous Carbon bearing Electrodeposited Silver Particles vol.8, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201500803
  3. Nanotechnology based anti-infectives to fight microbial intrusions vol.120, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13010
  4. Influence of Cissus quadrangularis Stabilized AgNPs and Its Structural, Optical, Antibacterial Analysis: A Comparative Study vol.26, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-015-0319-x
  5. Review of Antibacterial Activity of Titanium-Based Implants’ Surfaces Fabricated by Micro-Arc Oxidation vol.7, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings7030045
  6. Recent Advances in Antimicrobial Hydrogels Containing Metal Ions and Metals/Metal Oxide Nanoparticles vol.9, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9120636
  7. Fabrication of Antibacterial and Antiwear Hydroxyapatite Coatings via In Situ Chitosan-Mediated Pulse Electrochemical Deposition vol.9, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b15979
  8. pulse electrochemical polymerization vol.6, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/C7BM01104K
  9. ‘Green’ synthesis of metals and their oxide nanoparticles: applications for environmental remediation vol.16, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-018-0408-4
  10. Optimizing the nanostructure of graphene oxide/silver/arginine for effective wound healing vol.29, pp.47, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aadedc
  11. Graphene oxide/silver nanohybrid: Optimization, antibacterial activity and its impregnation on bacterial cellulose as a potential wound dressing based on GO-Ag nanocomposite-coated BC vol.18, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201700138
  12. Use of Nanoscale Materials for the Effective Prevention and Extermination of Bacterial Biofilms vol.23, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-017-0348-0
  13. In Vitro Degradation, Antibacterial Activity and Cytotoxicity of Mg-3Zn-xAg Nanocomposites Synthesized by Mechanical Alloying for Implant Applications pp.1544-1024, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-019-03923-5
  14. Synthesis of Silver-doped Silica-complex Nanoparticles for Antibacterial Materials vol.35, pp.10, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2014.35.10.2979
  15. Graphene oxide-modified ZnO particles: synthesis, characterization, and antibacterial properties vol.10, pp.specal, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.s88319
  16. Changes in soil bacterial communities and diversity in response to long-term silver exposure vol.91, pp.10, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiv114
  17. Recent Nanotechnology Approaches for Prevention and Treatment of Biofilm-Associated Infections on Medical Devices vol.2016, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1851242
  18. Rice husk based MCM-41 nanoparticles loaded with Ag2S nanostructures by a green and room temperature method and its antimicrobial property vol.47, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/24701556.2017.1357609
  19. A proposed mechanism of action of textile/Al2O3-TiO2 bimetal oxide nanocomposite as an antimicrobial agent vol.110, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2018.1526445
  20. A review of the antimicrobial potential of precious metal derived nanoparticle constructs vol.30, pp.37, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ab0d38
  21. Synthesis and characterization of ciprofloxacin loaded silver nanoparticles and investigation of their antibacterial effect vol.13, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/16878507.2020.1748941
  22. Effect of Deposition Parameters on Electrochemical Properties of Polypyrrole-Graphene Oxide Films vol.13, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030624
  23. Improving Electrochemical Properties of Polypyrrole Coatings by Graphene Oxide and Carbon Nanotubes vol.10, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10030507
  24. Synthesis, characterization and investigation of synergistic antibacterial activity and cell viability of silver-sulfur doped graphene quantum dot (Ag@S-GQDs) nanocomposites vol.8, pp.15, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1039/c9tb02823d
  25. Green approach for fabrication of a novel Zn(II) supramolecular compound as new precursor to produce nano-sized Zinc(II) oxide: Crystallography, topology, Hirshfeld Surface Analysis and biological act vol.1208, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.127885
  26. Graphene Oxide-Polypyrrole Coating for Functional Ceramics vol.10, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10061188
  27. Effect of Ti and Cu doping on the structural, optical, morphological and anti-bacterial properties of nickel ferrite nanoparticles vol.23, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104065
  28. Fabrication and Evaluation of Flexible Micro‐Supercapacitor from MWCNTs‐Ag Nanohybrid‐Sulfonated PANI Nanocomposite Embedded PVA‐TEOS Membrane vol.6, pp.13, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202003223
  29. Antibacterial and cytotoxicity assay of two new Zn(ii)complexes: Synthesis, characterization, X-Ray structure, topology, Hirshfeld surface and thermal analysis vol.1231, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.129947
  30. ZIF-8@s-EPS as a novel hydrophilic multifunctional biomaterial for efficient scale inhibition, antibacterial and antifouling in water treatment vol.773, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145706
  31. In vivo toxicity and antitumor activity of newly green synthesized reduced graphene oxide/silver nanocomposites vol.8, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-021-00400-7
  32. Antibacterial Activities of Prenylated Isoflavones from Maclura tricuspidata against Fish Pathogenic Streptococcus: Their Structure-Activity Relationships and Extraction Optimization vol.26, pp.24, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26247451