참고문헌
- 고민석, 박병태 (2011). 영재관찰추천 과정에서 담임교사의 영재교육전문성 인식수준에 따른 영재판별의 차이. 영재교육연구, 21(2), 427-447.
- 류지영 (2010). 관찰 추천을 통한 영재판별에 대한 영재담당교사들의 인식과 태도. 한국교원교육연구, 27(2), 159-178.
- 박민정, 전동렬 (2008). 과학 영재교육 대상자 선발방법으로서 교사 추천제 분석: 학생의 과학적 태도, 탐구력, 사고력, 문제해결력, 창의성을 중심으로. 한국과학교육학회지, 28(2), 111-119.
- 정경아, 정해숙, 권오남 (2004). 중등학생의 수학에서의 성별 격차 및 해소 방안 연구. 한국여성개발원.
- 조선미 (2011). 영재교육대상자 교사추천과정에서의 영재행동평정척도의 활용. 영재와 영재교육, 10(2), 5-30.
- 하주현 (2003). 창의적 사고와 문제발견 사고의 연령에 따른 차이. 교육심리연구, 17(1), 315-331.
- Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., Shea, D. L., & Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (2000). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability at age 13: Their status 20 years later. Psychological Sciences, 11(6), 474-480. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00291
- Birch, J. W. (1984). Is any identification procedure necessary? Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 157-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628402800404
- Borland, J. H. (1978). Teacher identification of the gifted: A new look. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2, 22-32.
- Borland, J. H., & Wright, L. (1994). Identifying young, potential gifted, economically disadvantaged students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 164-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629403800402
- Buss, T. V., Dahme, G., Wagner, H., & Wieczerkowski, W. (1986). Factors underlying teacher perceptions of highly gifted students: A cross-cultural study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 903-915. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448604600410
- Copenhaver, R. W., & McIntyre, D. J. (1992). Teachers' perceptions of gifted students. Roeper Review, 14(3), 151-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199209553411
- Davis, G., & Rimm, S. (1985). Education of the gifted and talented. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
- Endepohls-Ulpe, M., & Ruf, H. (2005). Primary school teachers' criteria for the identification of gifted pupils. High Ability Studies, 16(2), 219-228.
- Feldhusen, J. F., & Goh, B. E. (1995). Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 231-247. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0803_3
- Fox, L. H., Benbow, C. P., & Perkins, S. (1983). An accelerated mathematics program for girls: A longitudinal evaluation. In C. P. Benbow & J. Stanley (Eds.), Academic precocity: Aspects of its development (pp. 113-131). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Gagne, F. (1993). Sex differences in the aptitude and talents of children as judged by peers and teachers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629303700204
- Gagne, F. (1994). Are teachers really poor detectors? Comments on Pegnato and Birch's (1959) study of the effectiveness and efficiency of various identification techniques. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 124-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629403800305
- Gainous, E. C. (1985). Effects of the training program, Identification of the Potentially Gifted, on teachers' accuracy in the identification of intellectually gifted children. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 1140A.
- Gear, G. H. (1978). Effects of training on teachers' accuracy in the identification of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 22, 90-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698627802200121
- Guskin, S. L., Peng, C. J., & Majd-Jabbari, M. (1988). Teachers' perceptions of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 216-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628803200106
- Guskin, S. L., Peng, C. J., & Simon, M. (1992). Do teachers react to "multiple intelligences"? Effects of teachers' stereotypes on judgments and expectancies for students with diverse patterns of giftedness/talent. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 78-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629203600205
- Hany, E. A. (1995). Teachers' cognitive processes of identifying gifted students. In M. K. Katzko & F. J. Monks (Eds.), Nurturing talent: Individual needs and social ability (pp. 184-198). Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
- Heller, K. A., Perleth, C., & Lim, T. K. (2005). The Munich model of giftedness designed to identify and promote gifted students. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 172-197). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Hoge, R. D., & Cudmore, L. (1986). The use of teacher-judgment measures in the identification of gifted pupils. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2, 181-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(86)90016-8
- Hunsaker, S. L. (1994). Creativity as a characteristic of giftedness: Teachers see it, then don't. Roeper Review, 17(1), 11-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199409553610
- Hunsaker, S. L., Finley, V. S., & Frank, E. L. (1997). An analysis of teacher nominations and student performance in gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 19-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629704100203
- Johnsen, S. K. (2008). Identifying gifted and talented learners. In F. A. Karnes & K. R. Stephens (Eds.), Achieving excellence: Educating the gifted and talented (pp. 135-153). NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
- Karnes, F. A., & Koch, S. F. (1985). State definitions of the gifted and talented: An update and analysis. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 8(4), 285-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235328500800405
- Marland, S. P. (1971). Education of gifted and talented. Vol. 1. Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
- McBee, M. T. (2006). A descriptive analysis of referral sources for gifted identification screening by race and socioeconomic status. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 103-111. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2006-686
- McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2007). What predicts teachers' attitudes toward the gifted? Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 246-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207302719
- Neber, J. (2004). Teacher identification of students for gifted programs: Nominations to a summer school for highly-gifted students. Psychology Science, 46, 348-362.
- Neumeister, K. L. S., Adams, C. M., Pierce, R. L., Cassady, J. C., & Dixon, F. A. (2007). Fourth-grade teachers' perceptions of giftedness: Implications for identifying and serving diverse gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(4), 479-499. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2007-503
- Pegnato, C. W., & Birch, J. W. (1959). Locating gifted children in junior high schools: A comparison of methods. Exceptional Children, 25, 300-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440295902500702
- Pfeiffer, S. I. (2003). Challenges and opportunities for students who are gifted: What the experts say. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620304700207
- Pfeiffer, S. I., & Jarosewich, I. (2003). Gifted Rating Scales. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
- Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes gifedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180-184.
- Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., Hartman, R. K., & Westberg, K. L. (1997). Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
- Schack, G. D., & Starko, A. J. (1990). Identification of gifted students: An analysis of criteria preferred by preservice teachers, classroom teachers, and teachers of the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13(4), 346-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329001300405
- Siegle, D., & Powell, T. (2004). Exploring teacher biases when nominating students for gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800103
- Siegle, D., Moroe, M., Mann, R. L., & Wilson, H. E. (2010). Factors that influence in-service and preservice teachers'nominations of students for gifted and talented programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(3), 337-360. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321003300303
- Ziegler, A., & Heller, K. A. (2000). Conceptions of giftedness from a meta-theoretical perspective. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 3-21). Amsterdam: Elsevier.