References
- Howes AE. Model analysis for treatment planning: a portion of a symposium on case analysis and treatment planning. Am J Orthod 1952;38:183-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(52)90107-3
- Rees DJ. A method for assessing the proportional relation of apical bases and contact diameters of the teeth. Am J Orthod 1953;39:695-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(53)90122-5
- Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:794-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.023
- Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod 2004;74:298-303.
- Ball RL, Miner RM, Will LA, Arai K. Comparison of dental and apical base arch forms in Class II Division 1 and Class I malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:41-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.026
- Gupta D, Miner RM, Arai K, Will LA. Comparison of the mandibular dental and basal arch forms in adults and children with Class I and Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:10.e1-8.
- Ronay V, Miner RM, Will LA, Arai K. Mandibular arch form: the relationship between dental and basal anatomy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134: 430-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.040
- Cha BK, Lee YH, Lee NK, Choi DS, Baek SH. Soft tissue thickness for placement of an orthodontic miniscrew using an ultrasonic device. Angle Orthod 2008;78:403-8. https://doi.org/10.2319/051607-237.1
- Berco M, Rigali PH Jr, Miner RM, DeLuca S, Anderson NK, Will LA. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:17.e1-9.
- Damstra J, Fourie Z, Huddleston Slater JJ, Ren Y. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam com puted tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:16.e1-11.
- Tai K, Hotokezaka H, Park JH, Tai H, Miyajima K, Choi M, et al. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomo graphy study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138:262.e1-262.e1-11.
- Bayome M. Evaluation of three-dimensional relationships among skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue variables in normal occlusion sample [doctorial dissertation]. Seoul, Korea: The Catholic University of Korea; 2011.
- Kuntz TR, Staley RN, Bigelow HF, Kremenak CR, Kohout FJ, Jakobsen JR. Arch widths in adults with Class I crowded and Class III malocclusions compared with normal occlusions. Angle Orthod 2008;78:597-603. https://doi.org/10.2319/0003-3219(2008)078[0597:AWIAWC]2.0.CO;2
- Al-Khateeb SN, Abu Alhaija ES. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different maloc - clu sions in a Jordanian sample. Angle Orthod 2006; 76:459-65.
- Uysal T, Usumez S, Memili B, Sari Z. Dental and alveolar arch widths in normal occlusion and Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 2005;75:809-13.
- Slaj M, Spalj S, Pavlin D, Illes D, Slaj M. Dental archforms in dentoalveolar Class I, II and III. Angle Orthod 2010;80:919-24. https://doi.org/10.2319/112609-672.1
- Braun S, Hnat WP, Fender DE, Legan HL. The form of the human dental arch. Angle Orthod 1998;68:29-36.
- Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 1972;62:296-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(72)90268-0
- Andrews LF, Andrews WA. The six elements of orofacial harmony. Andrews J 2000;1:13-22.
- Sarikaya S, Haydar B, Ciğer S, Ariyürek M. Changes in alveolar bone thickness due to retraction of anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:15-26. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.119804
- Shelley AM, Brunton P, Horner K. Subjective image quality assessment of cross sectional imaging methods for the symphyseal region of the mandible prior to dental implant placement. J Dent 2011;39:764-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.08.008
- Howes AE. A polygon portrayal of coronal and basal arch dimensions in the horizontal plane. Am J Orthod 1954;40:811-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(54)90077-9
- Kim KY, Bayome M, Kim K, Han SH, Kim Y, Baek SH, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between dental and basal arch forms in normal occlusion. Korean J Orthod 2011;41:288-96. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2011.41.4.288
- Sergl HG, Kerr WJ, McColl JH. A method of measuring the apical base. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:479-83. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/18.5.479
- Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:106-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.018
- Scheid RC, Weiss G, Woelfel JB. Woelfel's dental anatomy. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
- Bayome M, Sameshima GT, Kim Y, Nojima K, Baek SH, Kook YA. Comparison of arch forms between Egyptian and North American white populations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:e245-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.11.012
- Kook YA, Nojima K, Moon HB, McLaughlin RP, Sinclair PM. Comparison of arch forms between Korean and North American white populations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:680-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.038
- Nojima K, McLaughlin RP, Isshiki Y, Sinclair PM. A comparative study of Caucasian and Japanese mandibular clinical arch forms. Angle Orthod 2001; 71:195-200.
Cited by
- A secondary analysis to determine variations of dental arch measurements with age and gender among Ugandans vol.8, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1411-6
- Mathematical beta function formulation for maxillary arch form prediction in normal occlusion population vol.105, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-016-0244-7
- Mandibular dental-basal arch forms in skeletal Class III patients with mandibular prognathism vol.76, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.odw.2017.05.002
- An Evaluation of Mandibular Dental and Basal Arch Dimensions in Class I and Class II Division 1 Adult Syrian Patients using Cone-beam Computed Tomography vol.19, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2279
- Influence of the anterior arch shape and root position on root angulation in the maxillary esthetic area vol.49, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2019.49.2.123