한국습지학회지 (Journal of Wetlands Research)

  • 제15권3호
  • /
  • Pages.301-315
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1229-6031(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0056(eISSN)
한국습지학회 (Korean Wetlands Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

하천의 물리적 구조에 따른 하천경관의 선호도 및 시각적 이미지 비교 연구

A Comparative Study on the Preference and Visual Characteristics of Stream Landscape According to Hydromorpological Structures

  • 최윤의 (고려대학교 환경생태공학부) ;
  • 이정아 (고려대학교 환경생태공학부) ;
  • 전진형 (고려대학교 환경생태공학부)
  • Choi, Yun Eui (Division of Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Jung A (Division of Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Chon, Jinhyung (Division of Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, Korea University)
  • 투고 : 2013.02.07
  • 심사 : 2013.05.15
  • 발행 : 2013.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 다양한 생태적 특성이 나타난 하천구간에 대한 경관의 선호도 및 시각적 이미지 형성에 영향을 주는 물리적 구조 특성을 실증적으로 밝혀내는 것이다. 하천의 물리적 구조 평가를 위해 LAWA기법을 활용하여 하천의 생태성을 평가하고, SD평가법을 통해 하천경관의 시각적 이미지를 조사하여 연구대상지의 물리적 구조 특성에 따른 시각적 이미지 차이를 비교 고찰하였다. 그 결과 생태성이 양호한 구간이 결여된 구간보다 조화롭고 아름다우며 자연적이고 깨끗한 이미지를 형성한다고 밝혀졌으며, 이러한 시각적 이미지에 큰 영향을 주는 물리적 구조는 하천식생 및 횡단형태, 인공구조물의 유무로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과는 하천복원시 훼손대상지의 생태적 기능과 경관미 향상을 위해 고려해야할 하천의 물리적 구조를 예측하고 제안하는데 기초자료로 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

The purpose of this study is to investigate characteristics of hydromorpological structures that affect landscape preference and visual characteristics on the sections of the designated streams where have dynamic ecological characteristics. We evaluated the ecological status of the streams utilizing LAWA to assess hydromorpological structures of streams. We also investigated preference and visual characteristics of stream landscapes through Semantic Differential Scale(SD scale). The differences of visual images according to the characteristics of hydromorpological structures in the sites were analyzed by descriptive statistics, One-way ANOVA, and t-test. As a result, this study showed that sections represented as "good" ecological status are shown to be harmonious, beautiful, natural, and clean comparing to sections represented as "poor" ecological status. The hydromorpological structures that have significant impacts on the visual characteristics are considered as riparian vegetation, cross-sectional shape, and the artificial structures. Results of this study can help guide the stream restoration of the damaged stream to improving ecological function and positive landscape.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Carling, PA (1991). An appraisal of the velocity-reversal hypothesis for stable pool-riffle sequences in the River Severn, England, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 16, pp. 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290160104
  2. Cho, DG (2011). Ecology Restoration Plan.Design, Nexusdesign, pp. 500-525. [Korean Literature]
  3. Cho, HJ, Woo HS, Lee, JW, and Cho, KH (2008). Changes in riparian vegetation after restoration in a urban stream, Yangjae stream, J. of Watlands Research, 10(3), pp. 111-124. [Korean Literature]
  4. Choi, GW, Kim, HJ, Park, JS, and Han, MS (2010). Hydromorphological structure assessment of urban streams after close-to-nature stream restoration using LAWA. J. of Korea Water Resources Association, 43(5), pp. 421-431. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2010.43.5.421
  5. Chon J and Shafer CS (2009). Aesthetic responses to urban greenway trail environments, Landscape Research, 34(1), pp. 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390802591429
  6. CIS-WFD (2003). Guidance on Establishing Reference Conditions and Ecological Status Class Boundaries for Inland Surface Waters, Common Implementation Strategy Working Group 2.3-REFCOND, pp. 28.
  7. Gyeonggi Research Institution (GRI) (2002). A Survey and Analysis of River Landscape in Kyonggi-do, 2002-06, Gyeonggi Research Institution, pp. 9-27. [Korean Literature]
  8. Gyeonggi Research Institution (GRI) (2008). Strategy of Stream Restoration in Gyeonggi Province through an Assessment of Stream Naturality and Ecological Health. 2007-09, Gyeonggi Research Institution, pp. 88-127. [Korean Literature]
  9. Hong, KG and Ahn KH (2003). The analysis of visual preference factors of scenic types of residential area on the skirts of river, J. of Korea Planners Association, 38(4), pp. 159-170. [Korean Literature]
  10. Jeon, SJ (2011). Stream Plan.Design, Seoul, ENGBOOK, pp. 272-365. [Korean Literature]
  11. Jeong, DY, Hur, SS, and Shin UD (2007). An analysis of the visual characteristics and preference factors of an urban river-with a case of Gapcheon in Daejeon metropolitan city -, J. of Korea Society for Environmental Restoration and Revegetation Technology, 10(3), pp. 14-24. [Korean Literature]
  12. Jo, HK and Han, GS (2005). Seasonal changes in structure and landscape of urban stream corridor -In the case of Gongji stream in chuncheon-, J. of the Environment Sciences, 14(8), pp. 739-748. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2005.14.8.739
  13. Joo, SH and Lee, SH (2012). Analysis of characteristics of urban stream landscape by landscape adjectives- Focused on the cheonggyecheon and Yangjaecheon-, J. of Korea Planners Association, 47(4), pp. 49-63. [Korean Literature]
  14. Kim, DC and Song, MJ (2010). An analysis of the visual characteristics and preference factors of traditional landscape of rivers in Kangnam region of China -with a case of river in Zhouzhuang, Jiangsu province of China, J. of Korean institute of traditional landscape architecture, 28(3), pp. 122-130. [Korean Literature]
  15. Kim, DH and Kim, DS (1999). Visual impact factor and preference image of urban stream landscape, J. of Korea Society for Environmental Restoration and Revegetation Technology, 2(4), pp. 9-15. [Korean Literature]
  16. Kim, HJ (2005). Study on the biophysical and ecological characteristics of the streams -A case of the sand streams in Kyonggi-do district-, J. of Korea Society Environment and Ecology, 19(3), pp. 215-230. [Korean Literature]
  17. Kim, KH (2008). Assessment of physical river disturbances in the Namgang-dam downstream, J. of Korea Society for Environmental Restoration and Revegetation Technology, 11(3), pp. 74-86. [Korean Literature]
  18. Kim, SG, Cho, WH, and Im, SB (1999). Landscape evaluation of rural stream based on the factor analysis of visual preference, J. of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 5(1), pp. 35-44
  19. Kim, SG, Kim, GE, Lee, JE, Shin, DH. and Lee, KS (2004). Urban stream landscape improvement after natural-style stream restoration -Case study of Yangjae stream, Seoul-, J. of Korea Society for Environmental Restoration and Revegetation Technology, 7(5), pp. 66-74. [Korean Literature]
  20. Kim, SW (1991). Funktionale beziehungen zwischen verschiedenen faktoren der fluvialmorphologie, J. of the Korean Geographical Society, 26(1), pp. 1-29. [Korean Literature]
  21. Korea Institute of Construction Technology (KICT) (2006). Development of Multi-fuctional River Restoration Techniques, Korea Institute of Construction Technology, pp. 130-165. [Korean Literature]
  22. Korea Water Resources Association (KWRA) (2009). River Design Critera?Explanation, Korea Water Resources Association, pp. 360-373. [Korean Literature]
  23. Kwon, YS and Cho, MS (2011). The character of urban design around the riverfront area in Korea-Focused on the composition of public space and land use pattern-, J. of Architectural Institute of Korea, 27(9), pp. 251-260. [Korean Literature]
  24. Lee, GR (2010). A comparative analysis on channel forms and landscapes at Naeseongcheon river and Wicheon river in Gyeongpook province, J. of the Korean Geomorphological Association, 17(4), pp. 1-16. [Korean Literature]
  25. Lee, JS and Song, JG (2010). Flood stage analysis on vegetated patterns with river sites, J. of Korea Contents Society, 10(11), pp. 452-460. [Korean Literature]
  26. Lee, SD and Kim, SC (2008). Studies on the ecological management and stream environmentin Dorim stream for establishing eco-wetland parks, J. of Wetlands Research, 10(3), pp. 133-139. [Korean Literature]
  27. Lee, SH, Ock, GY, and Choi, JK (2008). A study on the expansion process of vegetation on sand-bars in fluvial meandering stream, J. of Korea Society Environment and Ecology, 22(6), pp. 658-665. [Korean Literature]
  28. Lee, SS (2006). Visual preference of the methods for river embankment-The case of Dongchon in Gwangyang-, J. of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 34(3), pp. 12-22. [Korean Literature]
  29. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) (2010). The National Aquatic Ecological Monitoring Program, Ministry of Environment of South Korea, pp. 1-554. [Korean Literature]
  30. Robert A (1990). Boundary Roughness in Coarse-Grained Channels, Progress in Physical Geography, 14, pp. 42-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913339001400103
  31. SPSS Inc. (2011). SPSS for Windows, Release 20.0. Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  32. Woo, HS, Yoo, KK, and Park, JK (1994). A preliminary study of the hydraulic-geometrical relations of bed slope in some selected alluvial rivers, J. of the Korean Geographical Society, 29(3), pp. 253-265. [Korean Literature]
  33. Yoo, SW (2006). A study on the visual preference of Keum river sceneries at different water level, J. of Korean Society of Design Science, 63, pp. 273-282. [Korean Literature]
  34. Yoo, SW (2007). Analysis of visual preference factor for Youngsan river scenery considering the variation of river stage, J. of Korean Society of Design Science, 20(3), pp. 141-150. [Korean Literature]