The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Retrospective study of implant stability according to the implant length, diameter and position

임플란트 길이, 직경 및 식립 위치에 따른 임플란트 안정성에 관한 후향적 연구

  • Kim, Ji-Hye (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Jeon, Jin-Yong (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Heo, Yu-Ri (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Son, Mee-Kyoung (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 김지혜 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 보철학교실) ;
  • 전진용 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 보철학교실) ;
  • 허유리 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 보철학교실) ;
  • 손미경 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 보철학교실)
  • Received : 2013.08.12
  • Accepted : 2013.09.24
  • Published : 2013.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the influence of implant diameter, length and placement to implant stability. Materials and methods: Total 90 implants (US II plus$^{TM}$, Osstem co, Busan, Korea) of 72 patients were determined as experimental samples. The factors of diameters(${\phi}$ 4 mm, ${\phi}$ 5 mm), lengths (10 mm, 11.5 mm, 13 mm), and implant placement (maxilla, mandible) were analyzed. The stability of the implants was measured by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) at the time of implant placement and impression taking. The difference of ISQ values according to patient's gender was evaluated by Independent t-test. ISQ values were compared between implant diameter, length and placement using one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test (${\alpha}=.05$). To compare ISQ values between at the time of surgery and impression taking, paired t-tests were used (${\alpha}=.05$). Results: The change of implant length did not show significant different on the ISQ value (P>.05). However, 5 mm diameter implants had higher ISQ values than 4 mm diameter implants (P<.05). Implants placed on the mandible showed significantly higher ISQ values than on the maxilla (P<.05). Conclusion: In order to increase implant stability, it is better to select the wider implant, and implants placed on mandible are possible to get higher stability than maxilla. ISQ values at impression taking showed higher implant stability than ISQ values at implant placement, it means that RFA is clinically effective method to evaluate the change of implant stability through the osseointegration. The consideration of the factors which may affect to the implant stability will help to determine the time of load applying and increase the implant success rate.

연구 목적: 이 연구는 임플란트 직경, 길이 및 식립 부위가 임플란트의 안정성에 미치는 영향을 후향적 평가를 통해 비교, 분석하고자 하였다. 연구 대상 및 방법: 72명의 환자에게 식립된 총 90개의 임플란트(US II plus$^{TM}$, Osstem co, Busan, Korea)를 대상으로 임플란트 식립 직후와 인상 채득 당시에 공진주파수분석법(RFA)으로 임플란트 안정성 지수(ISQ)가 측정되었다. 상 하악에 식립된 직경은 4 mm와 5 mm이고 길이는 10 mm, 11.5 mm, 13 mm인 임플란트가 실험대상으로 선택되었다. 측정된 ISQ 값의 평균과 표준편차를 구하고 우선적으로 성별에 따른 차이를 확인하기 위하여 Independent t-test를 시행하였다. 임플란트 직경, 길이, 식립부위에 따른 ISQ 값의 실험군간 차이는 One-way ANOVA를 이용해 분석하였고, 사후검정을 위해 Tukey HSD test가 사용되었다. 임플란트 식립시와 인상채득시의 차이는 paired t-test로 분석하였다. 결과:인상채득시가 임플란트 식립 직후보다 임플란트 안정성의 증가가 관찰되었다. 임플란트 길이가 증가할수록 ISQ 값은 증가하였으나 통계적으로 유의적인 차이를 보이지 않았다. 직경 5 mm 임플란트는 4 mm 임플란트 보다 유의성 있게 높은 ISQ 값을 보였다(P<.05). 하악에 식립된 임플란트가 상악보다 더 높은 ISQ값을 보였다(P<.05). 결론:본연구결과, 임플란트 안정성을 높이기 위해서는 직경이 큰 임플란트를 사용하는 것이 효과적임을 알 수 있었다. 또한, 상악보다는 하악에서 더 높은 임플란트 안정성이 확인되었다. 임플란트 식립 직후의 일차 안정성보다 골유착 후 이차 안정성이 더 높게 나타남으로서 RFA를 이용한 방법이 골유착을 통한 임플란트 안정성의 변화를 평가함에 있어 임상적으로 유용한 것으로 판단된다. 임플란트 안정성 평가와 이에 영향을 주는 요소들에 대한 고려는 임플란트 하중 시기를 결정하고 임플란트 성공률을 증가시키는데 도움이 될 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:491-501.
  2. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a histometric study in the canine mandible. J. Biomed Master Res 1998;40:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199804)40:1<1::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-Q
  3. Sykaras N, Triplett RG, Nunn ME, Iacopino AM, Opperman LA. Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on bone regeneration and osseointegration of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:339-49. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012004339.x
  4. Albreksson T, Jacobsson M. Bone-metal interface in osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:597-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90344-1
  5. Carlsson L, Rostlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T. Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:21-4.
  6. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Linden B, Grondahl K, Lekholm U. Stability measurements of one-stage Branemark implants during healing in mandibles. A clinical resonance frequency analysis study. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Surg 1999;28:266-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(99)80156-8
  7. Schulte W, Lukas D. Periotest to monitor osseointegration and to check the occlusion in oral implantology. J Oral Implantol 1993;19:23-32.
  8. Aparicio C. The use of the Periotest value as the initial success criteria of an implant: 8-year report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997;17:150-61.
  9. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant - tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7: 261-67. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070308.x
  10. Meredith N, Book K, Friberg B, Jemt T, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:226-33. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080309.x
  11. Oh JH, Chang MT. Comparison of initial implant stability measured by Resonance frequency analysis between different implant systems. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2008;38:529-34. https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2008.38.3.529
  12. Atsumi M, Park SH, Wang HL. Methods used to assess implant stability: current status. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22: 743-54.
  13. Krennmair G, Waldenberger O. Clinical analysis of wide-diameter frialit-2 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:710-5.
  14. Bischof M, Nedir R, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP, Samson J. Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:529-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01042.x
  15. Han J, Lulic M, Lang NP. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: II. Implant surface modifications and implant diameter. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:605-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01909.x
  16. Ohta K, Takechi M, Minami M, Shigeishi H, Hiraoka M, Nishimura M, Kamata N. Influence of factors related to implant stability detected by wireless resonance frequency analysis device. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:131-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02032.x
  17. Lee JY, Lee WC, Kim JE, Shin SW. The influence of implant diameter, length and design changes on implant stability quotient (ISQ) value in artificial bone. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2012; 50:292-8. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2012.50.4.292
  18. Langer B, Langer L, Herrmann I, Jorneus L. The wide fixture: a solution for special bone situations and a rescue for the compromised implant. Part 1. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 1993;8: 400-8.
  19. Polizzi G, Rangert B, Lekholm U, Gualini F. Lindstrom H. Branemark System Wide Platform implants for single molar replacement: clinical evaluation of prospective and retrospective materials. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:61-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00107.x
  20. Kim DH, Pang EK, Kim CS, Choi SH, Cho KS. Non-submerged type implant stability analysis during initial healing period by resonance frequency analysis. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2009;39:339-48. https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2009.39.3.339
  21. Scortecci GM, Misch CE, Benner KU. Implants and Restorative dentistry. CRC Press, 2001, p. 60.
  22. Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Johansson C, Rangert B, Lekholm U. Influence of implant diameters on the integration of screw implants. An experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;26:141-8.
  23. Chung DM, Oh TJ, Lee J, Misch CE, Wang HL. Factors affecting late implant bone loss: a retrospective analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:117-26.
  24. Kim JM, Kim SJ, Han I, Shin SW, Ryu JJ. A comparison of the implant stability among various implant systems: clinical study. J Adv Prosthodont 2009;1:31-6. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2009.1.1.31
  25. Barewal RM, Oates TW, Meredith N, Cochran DL. Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:641-51.