Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Restorative Quality of Traditional Landscape and Visiting Experience - Based on the Assessment of Visitors of An-Ap-Ji in Kyong Ju -

전통경관의 치유특질과 방문경험 - 경주 안압지 방문자의 평가를 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2013.08.05
  • Accepted : 2013.08.28
  • Published : 2013.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Effortful directed attention becomes fatigued if it is demanded by environment. Kaplan and Kaplan's Attention Restoration Theory (ART) proposes that the fatigued directed attention can be restored by a restorative landscape. The four restorative components are being away, fascination, extent, and compatibility. The restorative effect of landscape has been mainly investigated in terms of nature vs. urban dichotomy, although ART acknowledges that various types of landscapes can induce restorative effect. The purpose of this study is to examine whether sense of place of landscape has an influence on the restorative effect, and how the effect relates to the visiting experience. This study was performed in An-Ap-Ji with 200 Korean visitors who participated in the questionnaire survey. Hartig et al.'s PRS (Perceived Restorativeness Scale) was used as the research instrument to measure the restorative quality. The Analysis results are summarized as: 1) PRS was a very reliable measurement for Koreans' assessment of traditional landscape. Especially, the factor analysis produced four restorative components which fully supported ART. 2) The sense of place of landscape was found to have a positive influence on the restorative effect. 3) Landscape beauty was also discovered to be influential in the restoration even though the effect of beauty was lower than that of the sense of place. 4) Among the four restorative components, three components (fascination, escape, compatibility) influenced both visiting satisfaction and revisit intention, where the order of the relevant importance was fascination, escape, and compatibility. Based on the results, it was suggested that PRS should be used in landscape restoration research in Korea in order to re-examine its' reliability. It was also proposed that more research should be directed to investigate the relationship between the sense of place and the restorative effect of landscape.

의도된 집중력은 환경에 의해 장기간 요구되면 피로하게 된다. Kaplan과 Kaplan의 집중력 회복이론(ART)에서는 피로한 의도된 집중력은 치유경관에 의해 회복된다고 주장된다. 네 가지 치유특질은 탈출감, 경관의 매력, 경관의 공간감, 그리고 적합성이다. ART에서는 다양한 경관이 치유효과를 유발할 수 있다고 인정하고 있지만, 지금까지 경관의 치유효과는 자연경관과 도시경관의 두 가지 차원에서 연구되어 왔다. 본 연구의 목적은 본 연구의 목적은 두 가지로 첫째, 전통경관을 대상으로 한국형 PRS를 개발하고, 두 번째, 전통경관의 치유특질이 방문경험에 미치는 영향을 조사하는 것이다. 본 연구는 안압지에서 수행되었으며, 200명의 안압지 방문자가 설문조사에 참여하였다. Hartig 등의 PRS(Perceived Restorativeness Scale)가 경관의 치유성을 평가하기 위한 측정도구로 사용되었다. 분석결과는 다음과 같이 요약된다. 1) PRS는 역사지역에 대한 한국인의 평가에 매우 신뢰성 있는 측정도구로 밝혀졌다. 특히, 요인분석에서는 네 가지 요인이 도출되었는데, 이는 ART를 뒷받침하고 있다. 2) 경관의 장소성은 치유효과에 긍정적인 영향이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 3) 경관의 아름다움은 비록 경관의 장소성이 경관치유에 미치는 영향보다는 작지만, 긍정적인 영향이 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 4) 네 가지 경관치유특질 중에서 세 가지 특질(경관의 매력, 탈출감, 적합성)이 방문만족과 재방문의사에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 상대적인 중요도의 순서는 경관의 매력, 탈출감, 적합성으로 분석되었다. 연구결과에 근거하면, 앞으로의 연구에서는 PRS의 신뢰성을 재 검증하기 위한 연구가 필요한 것으로 나타난다. 또한 장소성과 경관의 치유효과의 관계성을 밝히기 위한 연구도 필요한 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 이영경(2003) 심리적․생리적측정에근거한 산림경관의 스트레스완화 효과. 한국조경학회지 31(2): 70-82.
  2. 이영경(2004) 자연경관의 특질분석: 자연성에 대한 조경전문가와 일반인의 평가를 중심으로. 한국조경학회지 31(6): 1-14.
  3. 이영경(2006) 경관의 치유적 특질이 관광지 방문선호 및 만족에 미치는 영향 -경주 유산경관에 대한 미국인의 평가를 중심으로-. 한국조경학회지 34(5): 1-13.
  4. 이영경, 이병인(2006) 경관유형이 도시사무직근로자의 스트레스와 인지 수행에 미치는 영향: 자연경관과 도시경관과의 비교를 중심으로. 한국조경학회지 33(6): 1-11.
  5. 정충영, 최이규(2009) SPSSWIN을 이용한 통계분석. 서울: 무역경영사.
  6. Billig, M.(2006) Is my home my castle? place attachment, risk perception, and religious faith. Environment and Behavior 38: 248-265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505277608
  7. Bodin, M. and T. Hartig(2003) Does the outdoor environment mate for psychological restoration gained through learning?. Psychology of Sport and Excercise 4: 141-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-0292(01)00038-3
  8. Devine-Wright, P. and E. Lyons(1997) Remembering the pasts and representing places: The construction of national identities in Ireland. Journal of Environmental Psychology 17: 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0037
  9. English, J., K. Wilson and S. Keller-Olaman(2008) Health, healing and recovery: Therapeutic landscapes and the everyday lives of breast cancer survivors. Social Science and Medicine 1-11.
  10. Geores, M.(1998) Surviving on a metaphor. How "health=hot springs" created and sustained a town. In R. Kearns and W. Gesler (Eds.) Putting Health into Place: Landscape, Identity and Well-being, Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. pp. 36-52.
  11. Gesler, W.(1993) Therapeutic landscapes: theory and a case study of Epidauros. Greece Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 11: 2.
  12. Han, K. T.(2003) A reliable and valid self-rating measure of the restorative quality of natural environments. Landscape and Urban Planning 64: 209-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00241-4
  13. Hartig, T. A.(1993) Testing restorative environments theory. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of California, Irvine.
  14. Hartig, T., K. M. Korpela, G. W. Evans and T. Garling(1997) A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian Housing Planning Research 14: 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/02815739708730435
  15. Hauru, K., S. Lehvavirta, K. Korpela, and D. J. Kotze(2012) Closure of view to the urban matrix has positive effects on perceived restorativeness in urban forests in Hesinki, Finland, Landscape and Urban Planning 107(4): 361-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.07.002
  16. Hay, R.(1998) Sense of place in developmental context. Journal of Environmental Psychology 18: 5-29. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1997.0060
  17. Herzog, T. R., A. M. Black, K. A. Fountaine and D. J. Knotts(1997) Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 17: 165-170. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1997.0051
  18. Herzog, T. R., Colleen P. Maguire, and M. B. Nebel(2003) Assessing the restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23(2): 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00113-5
  19. Hipp, J. A., and O. A. Ogunseitan(2011) Effect of environmental conditions on percieved psychological restorativeness of the coastal parks. Journal of Environmental Psychology 31(4): 421-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.08.008
  20. Jorgensen, B. S. and R. C. Stedman(2001) Sense of place as an attitude: lakeshore owners attitude toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21: 233-248. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0226
  21. Kaplan, R. and S. Kaplan(1989) The Experience of Nature: a Psychological Perspective.
  22. Kaplan, S.(1995) The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 15: 169-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
  23. Kaplan, S.(2001) Meditation, restoration, and the management of mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior 33: 480-506. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973106
  24. Karmanov, D. and R. Hamel(2008) Assessing the restorative potential of contemporary urban environments: Beyond the nature versus urban dichotomy, Landscape and Urban Planning 86: 115-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.01.004
  25. Kearns, R. and D. Collins(2000) New Zealand children's health camps: therapeutic landscapes meet the contract state. Social Science and Medicine 51: 1047-1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00020-4
  26. Kline, R. B.(1998) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
  27. Laumann, K., T. Garling and K. M. Stormark(2001) Rating scale measures of restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21(1): 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0179
  28. Lewicka, M.(2008) Place attachment, place identity, and place memory: Restoring the forgotten city past. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28: 209-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.001
  29. Lindal, P. J. and T. Hartig(2013) Architectural variation, building height, and the restorative quality of urban residential streetscapes. Journal of Environmental Psychology 33: 26-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.09.003
  30. Low, S. M.(1992) Symbolic ties that bind. In I. Altman, and S. M. Low (Eds.), Place Attachment, New York: Plenum Press. pp. 165-185.
  31. Parsons, R., L. G. Tassinary, R. S. Ulrich, M. R. Hebl and M. Grossman-Alexander(1998) The view from the road: Implications for stress recovery and immunization. Journal of Environmental Psychology 18: 113-140. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1998.0086
  32. Peschardt, K. K. and U. K. Stigsdotter(2013) Associations between park characteristics and perceived restorativeness of small public urban green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning 112: 26-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.013
  33. Relph, E.(1976) Place and Placelessness. London: Pion Limited.
  34. Stedman, R.(2003). Is it really just a social construction? The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society and Natural Resources 16: 671-685. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920309189
  35. Tenngart, Ivarsson, C. and C. M. Hagerhall(2008) The perceived restorativeness of gardens-Assessing the restorativeness of a mixed built and natural scene type. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 7(2): 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2008.01.001
  36. Ulrich, R. S.(1979) Visual landscapes and psychological well-being. Landscape Research 4(1): 17-23.
  37. Ulrich, R. S.(1981) Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior 13: 523-556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916581135001
  38. Ulrich, R. S.(1983) Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman and J. F. Wohlwill, (eds.), Behavior and the Natural Environment. New York: Plenum Press. pp. 85-125.
  39. Ulrich, R. S., R. F. Simons, B. D. Losito, E. Fiorito, M. A. Miles and M. Zelson(1991) Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 11: 201-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
  40. Ulrich, R. S. and R. Parsons(1992) Influences of passive experiences with plants on individual well-being and health. In: Relt, P.(Ed.), The Role of Horticulture in Human Well-being and Social Development. Portland. Portland: Timber Press. pp. 93-105.
  41. Wilkie, S. and A. Stravridou(2013) Influence of environmental preference and environment type congruence on judgements of restoration potential. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 12(2): 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.01.004
  42. Williams, D. R. and J. J. Vaske(2003) The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalisability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science 49(6): 830-840.