DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Least Squares Regression Model to Detect Quantitative Trait Loci with Polar Overdominance in a Cross of Outbred Breeds: Simulation

  • Kim, Jong-Joo (School of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Dekkers, Jack C.M. (Department of Animal Science, Center for Integrated Animal Genomics, Iowa State University)
  • Received : 2013.06.25
  • Accepted : 2013.08.19
  • Published : 2013.11.01

Abstract

A least squares regression interval mapping model was derived to detect quantitative trait loci (QTL) with a unique mode of genomic imprinting, polar overdominance (POD), under a breed cross design model in outbred mammals. Tests to differentiate POD QTL from Mendelian, paternal or maternal expression QTL were also developed. To evaluate the power of the POD models and to determine the ability to differentiate POD from non-POD QTL, phenotypic data, marker data and a biallelic QTL were simulated on 512 F2 offspring. When tests for Mendelian versus parent-of-origin expression were performed, most POD QTL were classified as partially imprinted QTL. The application of the series of POD tests showed that more than 90% and 80% of medium and small POD QTL were declared as POD type. However, when breed-origin alleles were segregating in the grand parental breeds, the proportion of declared POD QTL decreased, which was more pronounced in a mating design with a small number of parents ($F_0$ and $F_1$). Non-POD QTL, i.e. with Mendelian or parent-of-origin expression (complete imprinting) inheritance, were well classified (>90%) as non-POD QTL, except for QTL with small effects and paternal or maternal expression in the design with a small number of parents, for which spurious POD QTL were declared.

Keywords

References

  1. Bidanel, J. P. and M. Rothschild. 2002. Current status of quantitative trait locus mapping in pigs. Pig News Inf. 23:39N-53N.
  2. Choi, B. H., Y.-M. Lee, M. Alam, J.-H. Lee, T. H. Kim, K.-S. Kim, and J.-J. Kim. 2011. Detection of Mendelian and parent-of-origin quantitative trait loci for meat quality in a cross between Korean native pig and Landrace. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 24:1644-1650. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11166
  3. Cockett, N., S. Jackson, T. Shay, F. Farnir, S. Berghmans, G. D. Snowder, D. M. Nielsen, and M. Georges. 1996. Polar overdominance at the ovine callipyge locus. Science 273:236-238. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.273.5272.236
  4. de Koning, D. J., A. P. Rattink, B. Harlizius, J. A. M. van Arendonk, E. W. Brascamp, and M. A. M. Groenen. 2000. Genome-wide scan for body composition in pigs revealed important role of imprinting. Porc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:7947-7950. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.140216397
  5. de Koning, D. J., H. Bovenhuis, and J. A. M. van Arendonk. 2002. On the detection of imprinted quantitative trait loci in experimental crosses of outbred species. Genetics 161:931-938.
  6. Freking, B. A., J. W. Keele, M. K. Nielsen, and K. A. Leymaster. 1998. Evaluation of the ovine callipyge locus: II. Genotypic effects on growth, slaughter and carcass traits. J. Anim. Sci. 76:2549-2559.
  7. Georges, M., C. Charlier, and N. Cockett. 2003. The callipyge locus: evidence for the trans interaction of reciprocally imprinted genes. Trends Genet. 19:248-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00082-9
  8. Haley, C. S., S. A. Knott, and J.-M. Elsen. 1994. Mapping quantitative trait loci in crosses between outbred lines using least squares. Genetics 136:1195-1207.
  9. Jeon, J. T., O. Carlborg, A. Toernsten, E. Giuffra, V. Amarger, P. Chardon, L. Anderson-Eklund, K. Andersson, I. Hansson, K. Lundstroem, and L. Anderssson. 1999. A paternally expressed QTL affecting skeletal and cardiac muscle mass in pigs maps to the IGF2 locus. Nat. Genet. 21:157-158. https://doi.org/10.1038/5938
  10. Kim, K.-S., J.-J. Kim, J. C. M. Dekkers, and M. F. Rothschild. 2004. Polar overdominant inheritance of a DLK1 polymorphism is associated with growth and fatness in pigs. Mamm. Genome 15:552-559.
  11. Kim, J.-J., H. Zhao, H. Thomsen, M. F. Rothschild, and J. C. M. Dekkers. 2005. Combined line-cross and half-sib QTL analysis of crosses between outbred lines. Genet. Res. 85:235-248. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672305007597
  12. Knott, S. A., L. Marklund, C. S. Haley, K. Andersson, W. Davies, H. Ellegren, M. Fredholm, I. Hansson, B. Hoyheim, K. Lundstrom, M. Moller, and L. Andersson. 1998. Multiple marker mapping of quantitative trait loci in a cross between outbred wild boar and Large White pigs. Genetics 149:1069-1080.
  13. Lee, K.-T., Y.-M. Lee, M. Alam, B. H. Choi, M. R. Park, K.-S. Kim, T.-H. Kim, and J.-J. Kim. 2012. A whole genome association study on meat quality traits using high density SNP chips in a cross between Korean native pig and Landrace. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 25:1529-1539. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12474
  14. Li, Y., B. H. Choi, Y.-M. Lee, M. Alam, J.-H. Lee, K.-S. Kim, K.-H. Baek, and J.-J. Kim. 2011. Characterization of QTL for growth and meat quality in combined pig QTL populations. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 24:1651-1659. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11221
  15. Malek, M., J. C. M. Dekkers, H. K. Lee, T. J. Bass, and M. F. Rothschild. 2001. A molecular genome scan analysis to identify chromosomal regions influencing economic traits in the pig. I. Growth and body composition. Mamm. Genome 12:630-636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003350020018
  16. Nezer, C., L. Moreau, B. Brouwers, W. Coppieters, J. Detilleux, R. Hanset, L. Karim, A. Kvasz, P. LeRoy, and M. Georges.1999. An imprinted QTL with major effect on muscle mass and fat deposition maps to the IGF2 locus in pigs. Nat. Genet. 21:155-156. https://doi.org/10.1038/5935
  17. Ruckert, C., P. Stratz, S. Preuss, and J. Bennewitz. 2012. Mapping quantitative trait loci for metabolic and cytological fatness traits of connected $F_2$ crosses in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 90:399-409. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4231
  18. Thomsen, H., H. K. Lee, M. F. Rothschild, M. Malek, and J. C. M. Dekkers. 2004. Characterization of quantitative trait loci for growth and meat quality in a cross between commercial breeds of swine. J. Anim. Sci. 82:2213-2228.
  19. Tycko, B. and I. M. Morison. 2002. Physiological functions of imprinted genes. J. Cell. Physiol. 192:245-258. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.10129
  20. Wilkins, J. F. and D. Haig. 2003. What good is genomic imprinting: the function of parent-specific gene expression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4:359-368. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1062