The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Peel strength of denture liner to PMMA and polyamide: laser versus air-abrasion

  • Korkmaz, Fatih Mehmet (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University) ;
  • Bagis, Bora (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, izmir Katip Celebi University) ;
  • Ozcan, Mutlu (Dental Materials Unit, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, University of Zurich) ;
  • Durkan, Rukiye (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Afyon Kocatepe University) ;
  • Turgut, Sedanur (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University) ;
  • Ates, Sabit Melih (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University)
  • Received : 2013.02.23
  • Accepted : 2013.07.10
  • Published : 2013.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study investigated the effect of laser parameters and air-abrasion on the peel strength of silicon-based soft denture liner to different denture resins. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Specimens (N=180) were prepared out of three different denture base resins (Rodex, cross-linked denture base acrylic resin; Paladent, heat-cured acrylic resin; Deflex, Polyamide resin) ($75mm{\times}25mm{\times}3mm$). A silicon-based soft denture liner (Molloplast B) was applied to the denture resins after the following conditioning methods: a) Air-abrasion ($50{\mu}m$), b) Er,Cr:YSGG laser (Waterlase MD Turbo, Biolase Technology) at 2 W-20 Hz, c) Er,Cr:YSGG laser at 2 W-30 Hz, d) Er,Cr:YSGG laser at 3 W-20 Hz, e) Er,Cr:YSGG laser at 3 W-30 Hz. Non-conditioned group acted as the control group. Peel test was performed in a universal testing machine. Failure modes were evaluated visually. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (${\alpha}$=.05). RESULTS. Denture liner tested showed increased peel strength after laser treatment with different parameters ($3.9{\pm}0.4-5.58{\pm}0.6$ MPa) compared to the control ($3.64{\pm}0.5-4.58{\pm}0.5$ MPa) and air-abraded groups ($3.1{\pm}0.6-4.46{\pm}0.3$ MPa), but the results were not statistically significant except for Paladent, with the pretreatment of Er,Cr:YSGG laser at 3 W-20 Hz. Polyamide resin after air-abrasion showed significantly lower peel strength than those of other groups ($3.1{\pm}0.6$ MPa). CONCLUSION. Heat-cured acrylic resin, PMMA, may benefit from Er,Cr:YSGG laser treatment at 3 W-20 Hz irradiation. Air-abrasion of polyamide resins should be avoided not to impair their peel bond strengths to silicon-based soft denture liners.

Keywords

References

  1. Bolayir G, Turgut M, Hubbezoglul, Dogan OM, Keskin S, Dogan A, Bek B. Evaluation of laser treatment on relinebase composites. J Adhesion 2007;83:117-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218460701196598
  2. Sertgoz A, Kulak Y, Gedik H, Taskonak B. The effect of thermocycling on peel strength of six soft lining materials. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:583-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00888.x
  3. Hatamleh MM, Watts DC. Bonding of maxillofacial silicone elastomers to an acrylic substrate. Dent Mater 2010;26:387-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.01.001
  4. Usumez A, Inan O, Aykent F. Bond strength of a silicone lining material to alumina-abraded and lased denture resin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;71:196-200.
  5. Haselden CA, Hobkirk JA, Pearson GJ, Davies EH. A comparison between the wear resistance of three types of denture resin to three different dentifrices. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25:335-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00250.x
  6. Al-Athel M, Jagger R, Jagger D. Effect of ageing on the bond strength of a permanent denture soft lining material. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:992-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00946.x
  7. Tanimoto Y, Saeki H, Kimoto S, Nishiwaki T, Nishiyama N. Evaluation of adhesive properties of three resilient denture liners by the modified peel test method. Acta Biomater 2009; 5:764-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2008.08.021
  8. Machado AL, Breeding LC, Puckett AD. Effect of microwave disinfection on the hardness and adhesion of two resilient liners. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:183-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.017
  9. Sarac D, Sarac YS, Basoglu T, Yapici O, Yuzbasioglu E. The evaluation of microleakage and bond strength of a siliconebased resilient liner following denture base surface pretreatment. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:143-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.11.012
  10. Kawano F, Ohguri T, Koran III A, Matsumoto N, Ichikawa T. Influence of lining design of three processed soft denture liners on cushioning effect. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:962-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00467.x
  11. Jacobsen NL, Mitchell DL, Johnson DL, Holt RA. Lased and sandblasted denture base surface preparations affecting resilient liner bonding. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:153-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70119-7
  12. Pinto JR, Mesquita MF, Henriques GE, de ArrudaNobilo MA. Effect of thermocycling on bond strength and elasticity of 4 long-term soft denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88: 516-21. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.128953
  13. Aydin AK, Terzioglu H, Akinay AE, Ulubayram K, Hasirci N. Bond strength and failure analysis of lining materials to denture resin. Dent Mater 1999;15:211-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00038-X
  14. McCabe JF, Carrick TE, Kamohara H. Adhesive bond strength and compliance for denture soft lining materials. Biomaterials 2002;23:1347-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00253-8
  15. Pisani MX, Silva-Lovato CH, Malheiros-Segundo Ade L, Macedo AP, Paranhos HF. Bond strength and degree of infiltration between acrylic resin denture liner after immersion in effervescent denture cleanser. J Prosthodont 2009;18:123-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00380.x
  16. Kawano F, Dootz ER, Koran A 3rd, Craig RG. Comparison of bond strength of six soft denture liners to denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:368-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90347-D
  17. Waters MG, Jagger RG. Mechanical properties of an experimental denture soft lining material. J Dent 1999;27:197-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00046-3
  18. Tugut F, Akin H, Mutaf B, Akin GE, Ozdemir AK. Strength of the bond between a silicone lining material and denture resin after Er:YAG laser treatments with different pulse durations and levels of energy. Lasers Med Sci 2012;27:281-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0862-1
  19. Baysan A, Parker S, Wright PS. Adhesion and tear energy of a long-term soft lining material activated by rapid microwave energy. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:182-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70214-8
  20. Braden M, Wright PS, Parker S. Soft lining materials-a review. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1995;3:163-74.
  21. Anusavice KJ, Phillips RW. Phillip's science of dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis; Elsevier, 2003. p. 751-3.
  22. Lawrence J, Li L. Modification of the wettability characteristics of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) by means of $CO_2$, Nd:YAG, excimer and high power diode laser radiation. Mater SciEng A 2001;303:142-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01851-7
  23. Sarac YS, Basoglu T, Ceylan GK, Sarac D, Yapici O. Effect of denture base surface pretreatment on microleakage of a silicone-based resilient liner. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:283-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.004
  24. Akin H, Tugut F, Mutaf B, Akin G, Ozdemir AK. Effect of different surface treatments on tensile bond strength of silicone- based soft denture liner. Lasers Med Sci 2011;26:783-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0825-6
  25. Storer R. Resilient denture base materials. Part 1. Introduction and laboratory evaluation. Br Dent J 1962;113:195-203.
  26. Amin WM, Fletcher AM, Ritchie GM. The nature of the interface between polymethyl methacrylate denture base materials and soft lining materials. J Dent 1981;9:336-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(81)90007-5
  27. Akin H, Tugut F, Guney U, Kirmali O, Akar T. Tensile bond strength of silicone-based soft denture liner to two chemically different denture base resins after various surface treatments. Lasers Med Sci 2013;28:119-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1082-7
  28. Zhang H, Fang J, Hu Z, Ma J, Han Y, Bian J. Effect of oxygen plasma treatment on the bonding of a soft liner to an acrylic resin denture material. Dent Mater J 2010;29:398-402. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2009-124
  29. Minami H, Suzuki S, Ohashi H, Kurashige H, Tanaka T. Effect of surface treatment on the bonding of an autopolymerizing soft denture liner to a denture base resin. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:297-301.
  30. Yanikoglu N, Denizoglu S. The effect of different solutions on the bond strength of soft lining materials to acrylic resin. Dent Mater J 2006;25:39-44. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.25.39
  31. Shimizu H, Ikuyama T, Hayakawa E, Tsue F, Takahashi Y. Effect of surface preparation using ethyl acetate on the repair strength of denture base resin. Acta Odontol Scand 2006;64:159-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350500514808
  32. Craig RG, Gibbons P. Properties of resilient denture liners. J Am Dent Assoc 1961;63:382-90.
  33. Baygin O, Korkmaz FM, Tuzuner T, Tanriver M. The effect of different enamel surface treatments on the microleakage of fissure sealants. Lasers Med Sci 2012;27:153-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0918-x
  34. Botta SB, da Ana PA, Zezell DM, Powers JM, Matos AB. Adhesion after erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-galliumgarnetlaser application at three different irradiation conditions. Lasers Med Sci 2009;24:67-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-007-0521-3
  35. Basaran EG, Ayna E, Basaran G, Beydemir K. Influence of different power outputs of erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium- gallium-garnet laser and acid etching on shear bond strengths of a dual-cure resin cement to enamel. Lasers Med Sci 2011;26:13-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-009-0742-8
  36. Wright PS. Characterization of the adhesion of soft lining materials to poly(methyl methacrylate). J Dent Res 1982;61: 1002-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345820610080101
  37. Mutluay MM, Ruyter IE. Evaluation of bond strength of soft relining materials to denture base polymers. Dent Mater 2007;23:1373-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.014
  38. Ucar Y, Akova T, Aysan I. Mechanical properties of polyamide versus different PMMA denture base materials. J Prosthodont 2012;21:173-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00804.x
  39. Yunus N, Rashid AA, Azmi LL, Abu-Hassan MI. Some flexural properties of a nylon denture base polymer. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:65-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01370.x
  40. al-Athel MS, Jagger RG. Effect of test method on the bond strength of a silicone resilient denture lining material. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:535-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90014-1
  41. Kutay O. Comparison of tensile and peel bond strengths of resilient liners. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:525-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90194-5
  42. Elias CN, Henriques FQ. Effect of thermocycling on the tensile and shear bond strengths of three soft liners to a denture base resin. J Appl Oral Sci 2007;15:18-23.
  43. Suske E, Scharf T, Schaaf P, Panchenko E, Nelke D, Buback M, Kijewski H, Krebs HU. Variation of mechanical properties of pulsed laser deposited PMMA films during annealing. Appl Phys A 2004;79;1295-7.
  44. Kulak-Ozkan Y, Sertgoz A, Gedik H. Effect of thermocycling on tensile bond strength of six silicone-based, resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:303-10. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.41
  45. Oguz S, Mutluay MM, Dogan OM, Bek B. Effect of thermocycling on tensile strength and tear resistance of four soft denture liners. Dent Mater J 2007;26:296-302. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.296

Cited by

  1. Tensile Bond Strength between Soft Liners and Two Chemically Different Denture Base Materials: Effect of Thermocycling vol.25, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12296
  2. The effect of ultrafast fiber laser application on the bond strength of resin cement to titanium vol.32, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2216-8
  3. The Effects of Er:YAG, Nd:YAG, and Ho:YAG Laser Surface Treatments to Acrylic Resin Denture Bases on the Tensile Bond Strength of Silicone-Based Resilient Liners vol.33, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2015.3933
  4. Bond Strength of Resilient Lining Materials to Denture Base Resin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis pp.1059941X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12958
  5. Effect of Different Surface Treatments and Thermocycling on Bond Strength of a Silicone-based Denture Liner to a Denture Base Resin vol.17, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1819
  6. The Effect of Sandblasting on Bond Strength of Soft Liners to Denture Base Resins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies vol.2021, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5674155