The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Push-out bond strengths of fiber-reinforced composite posts with various resin cements according to the root level

  • Chang, Hoon-Sang (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Noh, Young-Sin (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lee, Yoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University) ;
  • Min, Kyung-San (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Bae, Ji-Myung (Department of Dental Biomaterials and Institute of Biomaterials.Implant, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • Received : 2013.03.26
  • Accepted : 2013.07.11
  • Published : 2013.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to determine whether the push-out bond strengths between the radicular dentin and fiber reinforced-composite (FRC) posts with various resin cements decreased or not, according to the coronal, middle or apical level of the root. MATERIALS AND METHODS. FRC posts were cemented with one of five resin cement groups (RelyX Unicem: Uni, Contax with activator & LuxaCore-Dual: LuA, Contax & LuxaCore-Dual: Lu, Panavia F 2.0: PA, Super-Bond C&B: SB) into extracted human mandibular premolars. The roots were sliced into discs at the coronal, middle and apical levels. Push-out bond strength tests were performed with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min, and the failure aspect was analyzed. RESULTS. There were no significant differences (P>.05) in the bond strengths of the different resin cements at the coronal level, but there were significant differences in the bond strengths at the middle and apical levels (P<.05). Only the Uni and LuA cements did not show any significant decrease in their bond strengths at all the root levels (P>.05); all other groups had a significant decrease in bond strength at the middle or apical level (P<.05). The failure aspect was dominantly cohesive at the coronal level of all resin cements (P<.05), whereas it was dominantly adhesive at the apical level. CONCLUSION. All resin cement groups showed decreases in bond strengths at the middle or apical level except LuA and Uni.

Keywords

References

  1. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod 2004;30:289-301. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200405000-00001
  2. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63:529-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90070-S
  3. Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:431-7. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.123227
  4. Bae JM, Kim KN, Hattori M, Hasegawa K, Yoshinari M, Kawada E, Oda Y. Fatigue strengths of particulate filler composites reinforced with fibers. Dent Mater J 2004;23:166-74. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.23.166
  5. Jung SH, Min KS, Chang HS, Park SD, Kwon SN, Bae JM. Microleakage and fracture patterns of teeth restored with different posts under dynamic loading. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98:270-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60100-0
  6. Mezzomo E, Massa F, Libera SD. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with two different post-and-core designs cemented with two different cements: an in vitro study. Part I. Quintessence Int 2003;34:301-6.
  7. Drummond JL, Toepke TR, King TJ. Thermal and cyclic loading of endodontic posts. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;107:220-4. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836.1999.eos1070310.x
  8. Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber, and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1:153-8.
  9. Viguie G, Malquarti G, Vincent B, Bourgeois D. Epoxy/carbon composite resins in dentistry: mechanical properties related to fiber reinforcements. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:245-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90336-0
  10. Vallittu PK. Prosthodontic treatment with a glass fiber-reinforced resin-bonded fixed partial denture: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:132-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70145-9
  11. Duarte S Jr, Botta AC, Meire M, Sadan A. Microtensile bond strengths and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of self-adhesive and self-etch resin cements to intact and etched enamel. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:203-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60179-1
  12. Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent 2000;13:60D-76D.
  13. Ozcan M, Mese A. Adhesion of conventional and simplified resin-based luting cements to superficial and deep dentin. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1081-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0594-z
  14. Li N, Nikaido T, Takagaki T, Sadr A, Makishi P, Chen J, Tagami J. The role of functional monomers in bonding to enamel: acid-base resistant zone and bonding performance. J Dent 2010;38:722-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.015
  15. Ramos MB, Pegoraro TA, Pegoraro LF, Carvalho RM. Effects of curing protocol and storage time on the microhardness of resin cements used to lute fiber-reinforced resin posts. J Appl Oral Sci 2012;20:556-62. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000500011
  16. Sigemori RM, Reis AF, Giannini M, Paulillo LA. Curing depth of a resin-modified glass ionomer and two resin-based luting agents. Oper Dent 2005;30:185-9.
  17. Ritter AV, Ghaname E, Pimenta LA. Dentin and enamel bond strengths of dual-cure composite luting agents used with dual-cure dental adhesives. J Dent 2009;37:59-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.09.006
  18. Bell AM, Lassila LV, Kangasniemi I, Vallittu PK. Bonding of fibre-reinforced composite post to root canal dentin. J Dent 2005;33:533-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.014
  19. Benetti AR, Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Influence of curing rate of resin composite on the bond strength to dentin. Oper Dent 2007;32:144-8. https://doi.org/10.2341/06-39
  20. Bitter K, Meyer-Lueckel H, Priehn K, Kanjuparambil JP, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Effects of luting agent and thermocycling on bond strengths to root canal dentine. Int Endod J 2006;39:809-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01155.x
  21. Bitter K, Priehn K, Martus P, Kielbassa AM. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strengths of various luting agents to tooth-colored posts. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:302-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.012
  22. D'Arcangelo C, Cinelli M, De Angelis F, D'Amario M. The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98: 193-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60055-9
  23. Mosharraf R, Baghaei Yazdi N. Comparative evaluation of effects of different surface treatment methods on bond strength between fiber post and composite core. J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4:103-8. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.2.103
  24. Khamverdi Z, Talebian R. Effect of ascorbic acid, ethanol and acetone on adhesion between the treated fiber posts and composite resin cores. J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4:187-91. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.4.187
  25. International Standards Organization. ISO/TS 11405: 2003(E) Dental materials - Testing of adhesion to tooth structure. ISO, Geneva, 2003.
  26. Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers re-inforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:318-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70276-3
  27. Carvalho CA, Breschi L, Navarro MF, Atta MT, Ferrari M. Push-out bond strength and SEM evaluation of a new bonding approach into the root canal. J Appl Oral Sci 2012;20: 613-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000600005
  28. Gaston BA, West LA, Liewehr FR, Fernandes C, Pashley DH. Evaluation of regional bond strength of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endod 2001;27:321-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200105000-00001
  29. Foxton RM, Nakajima M, Tagami J, Miura H. Adhesion to root canal dentine using one and two-step adhesives with dual- cure composite core materials. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:97-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01404.x
  30. Pereira PC, Melo RM, Chaves C, Galhano GA, Bottino MA, Balducci I. The adhesive system and root canal region do not influence the degree of conversion of dual resin cement. J Appl Oral Sci 2010;18:477-81. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000500008
  31. Teixeira CS, Silva-Sousa YT, Sousa-Neto MD. Bond strength of fiber posts to weakened roots after resin restoration with different light-curing times. J Endod 2009;35:1034-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.018
  32. Mallmann A, Jacques LB, Valandro LF, Mathias P, Muench A. Microtensile bond strength of light- and self-cured adhesive systems to intraradicular dentin using a translucent fiber post. Oper Dent 2005;30:500-6.
  33. Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, Krejci I, Meyer JM, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater 2003;19:199-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00030-1
  34. Perdigao J, Gomes G, Lee IK. The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber posts. Dent Mater 2006;22:752-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.002
  35. Acquaviva PA, Cerutti F, Adami G, Gagliani M, Ferrari M, Gherlone E, Cerutti A. Degree of conversion of three composite materials employed in the adhesive cementation of indirect restorations: a micro-Raman analysis. J Dent 2009;37: 610-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.04.001
  36. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stresses in composites for two different curing modes. Dent Mater 1993;9:2-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90095-8
  37. Kato H, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etching and sandblasting on bond strength to sintered porcelain of unfilled resin. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:103-10. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00489.x
  38. Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:251-8.
  39. Barkmeier WW, Cooley RL. Laboratory evaluation of adhesive systems. Oper Dent 1992;Suppl 5:50-61.
  40. Staninec M, Kawakami M. Adhesion and microleakage tests of a new dentin bonding system. Dent Mater 1993;9:204-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90121-6
  41. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 1994;73: 1212-20.
  42. Gomes AL, Castillo-Oyague R, Lynch CD, Montero J, Albaladejo A. Influence of sandblasting granulometry and resin cement composition on microtensile bond strength to zirconia ceramic for dental prosthetic frameworks. J Dent 2013;41:31-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.09.013

Cited by

  1. Influence of root dentin treatment on the push-out bond strength of fibre-reinforced posts vol.31, pp.0, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0029
  2. Test methods for bond strength of glass fiber posts to dentin: A review vol.93, pp.1-2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2016.1184094
  3. Effect of Chlorhexidine Treatment Prior to Fiber Post Cementation on Long-Term Resin Cement Bond Strength vol.43, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2341/16-241-LR2
  4. Influence of glass fiber post translucency on microhardness and dentin bond strength of resin cement at different root levels vol.30, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2015.1114066
  5. Influence of the ER,CR:YSGG laser and different irrigation methods on push-out bond strength of fiber post vol.30, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1143582
  6. Push-Out Bond Strength Evaluation of Glass Fiber Posts With Different Resin Cements and Application Techniques vol.41, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2341/14-343-l