한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제33권5호
  • /
  • Pages.981-994
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

고등학생들의 생태 인식에 관한 두 가지 모델 검증: 친숙함의 효과와 생태-자연적 관점 경로

Examining Two Causal Models Regarding High School Students' Ecological Perspective: The Role of Familiarity and Ecologistic-Naturalistic Path

  • 투고 : 2013.05.21
  • 심사 : 2013.08.03
  • 발행 : 2013.08.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 학생들의 생태 태도에 관한 두 가지 가설적 모델을 통계적으로 검증하였다. 첫 번째 연구 모델은 생물의 심미적인 관점이 부정적 관점으로 이어지는 경로에서 인식과 친숙함의 매개 효과이다. 두 번째 연구 모델은 인간적 관점에서 지배적 관점으로 이어지는 두 가지 차별적인 경로이다. 이 연구를 위하여 고등학교 1학년 학생 104명이 참여하였다. 상관관계, 편상관관계, 경로분석을 활용하여 모델의 적합도를 확인하였다. 연구 결과는 생물에 대한 인지와 친숙함이 심미적인 관점과 부정적 관점을 조절하고 있음을 보여주고 있다. 심미적인 관점에서 발생하는 학생들의 선입견이 학습으로 조절될 수 있음을 보여주고 있다. 두 번째, 인간적 관점과 지배적 관점 경로에서 생태-자연적 관점 경로와 과학-이용적 관점 경로는 독립적이다. 과학-이용적 관점은 지배적 관점에 정적인 영향력이 있다. 학생들의 자연에 대한 지배적 관점을 줄이기 위해서는 생태-자연적 관점을 이해할 필요가 있을 것이다.

This study aims to examine two hypothetical models for the variables of students' environmental perspective. First hypothetical model is the mediating role of recognition and familiarity between aesthetic and negativistic perspectives. Second hypothetical model is the separate path from humanistic to dominionistic perspectives. One hundred four tenth grade students participated in this study. We used Pearson correlation, partial correlation, and path analysis to examine the fitness of hypothetical models. The findings showed that the mediating role of recognition and familiarity between aesthetic and negativistic perspectives were statistically accepted. To prevent students' bias for fancy or gross animals, the learning (for instance, recognition and familiarity) may play role in reducing the bias. Second, there were two differential paths from humanistic to dominionistic perspectives (ecologistic-naturalistic path and scientistic-utilitarian path). While ecologistic-naturalistic path does not reach dominionistic perspective, scientistic-utilitarian path does reach dominionistic perspective. To prevent students' dominionistic perspective for nature, they need to understand ecologistic-naturalistic minds for the nature.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kim, S. J. (2006). Oriental thought, the present state and future of environmental and ecological discussion. Issues in East-Asian Philosophy, 14, 145-163.
  2. Kim, Y. J. (2011). A new approach to Laoz's thought on ecological discourse. Literature and Environment, 10(1), 7-37.
  3. Ministry of Education and Science Technology (2009). 2009 revised science curriculum guide. Seoul: Mirae N. Press.
  4. Oh, H. S., & Hong, C. E. (2007). Current Conditions of Habitat for Rana catesbeiana and Trachemys scripta elegans Imported to Jeju-do, Including Proposed Management Plans. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, 21(4), 311-317.
  5. Adeniyi, A. S., & Adeyinka, O. J. (2012). Comparative Survey of Litter Arthropods and Soil Mesofauna in the Natural Forest and Plantation (a Case Study: Akure Forest Reserve Aponmu). International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 2(1), 63-71. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijaf.20120201.11
  6. Almeida, A., & Vasconcelos, C. (2013). Teachers' perspectives on the human-nature relationship: implications for environmental education. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 299-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9272-z
  7. Capra, F. (1996). The web of life. London: Haper Collins.
  8. Choi, K. H., Lee, H. J., Shin, N. S., Kim, S. W., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st Century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 48(6), 670-697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424
  9. Davey, G. C. L., McDonald, A. S., Hirisave, U., Prabhu, G. G., Iwawaki, S., Jim, C. I., et al. (1998). A cross-national study of animal fears. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 36(7 8), 735-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00059-X
  10. Fredrikson, M., Annas, P., Fischer, H., & Wik, G. (1996). Gender and age differences in the prevalence of specific fears and phobias. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 34(1), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(95)00048-3
  11. Hashimoto-Martell, E. A., McNeill, K. L., & Hoffman, E. M. (2012). Connecting urban youth with their environment: The impact of an urban ecology course on student content knowledge, environmental attitudes and responsible behaviors. Research in Science Education, 42(5), 1007-1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9233-6
  12. Keller, S. R. (1985). Public perceptions of predators, particularly the wolf and coyote. Biological Conservation, 31, 167-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(85)90047-3
  13. Kellert, S. R. (1993). The biological basis for human values of nature. In S. R. Kellert & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 42-69).Washington, DC: Island Press.
  14. Kim, H. S. (2012). Climate change, science and community. Public Understanding of Science, 21(3), 268-285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662511421711
  15. Kim, S. J. (2006). Oriental thought, the present state and future of environmental and ecological discussion. Issues in East-Asian Philosophy, 14, 145-163.
  16. Kim, Y. J. (2011). A new approach to'aoz's thought on ecological discourse. Literature and Environment, 10(1), 7-37.
  17. Law, W., & Salick, J. (2005). Human-induced dwarfing of Himalayan snow lotus, Saussurea laniceps (Asteraceae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(29), 10218-10220. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502931102
  18. Lee, Y. C. (2007). Developing decision-making skills for socio-scientific issues. Journal of Biological Education, 41(4), 170-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2007.9656093
  19. Lee, Y. C., & Grace, M. (2010). Students'reasoning processes in making decisions about an authentic, local socioscientific issue: bat conservation. Journal of Biological Education, 44(4), 156-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2010.9656216
  20. Mulkens, S. A. N., de Jong, P. J., & Merckelbach, H. (1996). Disgust and Spider Phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105(3), 464-468. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.105.3.464
  21. Oh, H. S., & Hong, C. E. (2007). Current Conditions of Habitat for Rana catesbeiana and Trachemys scripta elegans Imported to Jeju-do, Including Proposed Management Plans. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, 21(4), 311-317.
  22. Olsen, E. M., Heino, M., Lilly, G. R., Morgan, M. J., Brattey, J., Ernande, B., & Dieckmann, U. (2004). Maturation trends indicative of rapid evolution preceded the collapse of northern cod. Nature, 428(6986), 932-935. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02430
  23. Palmer, J. (1993). Development of concern for environmental and formative experiences of educators. The Journal of Environmental Education, 24(3), 26-30.
  24. Prain, V. (2012). Acting on substantiality. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 149-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9261-2
  25. Prokop, P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2010). Effects of keeping pets on children's attitudes toward popular and unpopular animals. Anthrozoos, 23(1), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303710X12627079939107
  26. Prokop, P., Tolarovicova, A., Camerik, A., Peterkova, V. (2010). High school students'attitudes towards spiders: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Science Education, 32(12), 1665-1688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903253908
  27. Schumacker, R.E., & Lomax, R.G. (1996). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  28. Slingsby, D., & Barker, S. (2003). Making connections: Biology, environmental education and education for sustainable development. Journal of Biological Education, 38(1), 4-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655888
  29. Smith, G. A., & Williams, D. R. (1999). Ecological education: Extending the definition of environmental education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 12, 139-146.
  30. Tanner, T. (1980). Significance life experiences: A new research area in environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 11(4), 20-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1980.9941386
  31. Wada-Katsumata, A., Silverman, J., & Schal, C. (2013). Changes in Taste Neurons Support the Emergence of an Adaptive Behavior in Cockroaches. science, 340(6135), 972-975. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234854
  32. Wagler, R., & Wgler, A. (2011). Arthropods: Attitude and incorporation in preservice elementary teacher. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 6(3), 229-250.
  33. Young, J., Richards, C., Fischer, A., Halada, L., Kull, T., Kuzniar, A., Tartes, U., Uzunov, Y., & Watt, A. (2007). Conficts between biodiversity conservation and human activities in the Central and Eastern European countries. Ambio, 36, 545-550. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[545:CBBCAH]2.0.CO;2

피인용 문헌

  1. 해양 플라스틱 쓰레기로 인한 문제와 해결책에 관한 초등학생의 인식 조사 vol.39, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2020.39.3.399