Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education (수산해양교육연구)

The Korean Society for Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education (한국수산해양교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Teachers' Concern and Levels of Use on Performance Assessment in China Middle School

중국 중학교 교사들의 수행평가에 관한 관심도와 실행 수준 분석 - 북경시 중심으로-

  • Received : 2012.10.29
  • Accepted : 2013.01.16
  • Published : 2013.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze middle school teachers' concern about and implementation degree of performance assessment in China. The research questions are as follows: First, what kind of concern is held by middle school teachers who implement performance assessment? Second, is there any significant difference in stages of concern the teachers on performance assessment according to their gender, education level and teaching career? Third, which level of use is shown by middle school teachers who implement performance assessment? Fourth, what is the correlation between middle school teachers' Stages of Concern and Levels of Use on performance assessment? This study was conducted based on a Concerns-Based Adoption Model (Hall, 1973; CBAM) that viewed teachers as the most primary factor of the execution of innovation, in this case, performance assessment. Performance assessment is assessment based on observation and judgement (Stiggins, 1994), and require test takers to complete a process or produce a product in a context that closely resembles real-life situations. The subjects of this study were randomly sampled from 120 middle school teachers throughout Bei-Jing, China. The questionnaires were distributed to them by mail, and they were asked to return their questionnaire by mail. The collect data were analyzed by SPSS/WIN 18.0 program in terms of frequency, correlation, or MANOVA. Frequency analysis was used to analyze concern of middle school teachers on performance assessment. To gain an frequency of the individuals in each stage, we regarded the stage in which a teacher had his/her highest score as his/her relevant stage. Correlation analysis was adopted to identify the correlation between teachers' stage of concern and level of use. To analyze the difference of the concern of China middle school teachers on performance assessment according to their individual background variables such as gender, education level, and teaching career, MANOVA was performed.

Keywords

References

  1. 김경자(1993). 교육과정 혁신: 관심에 기초한 교육과정 실행 모형(CBAM), 서울 : 교육과학사.
  2. 김석우.이대용.강영이(2011). 중학교 교사들의 수행평가에 관한 관심도와 실행수준분석, 교육평가연구 24(1), 31-50.
  3. 김은영(1994). 초등교사들의 자연과 교육과정에 대한 관심도, 이화여자대학교 석사학위 논문.
  4. 김재헌(1996). 체육교육과정에 대한 교사의 관심도와 활용도 연구, 서울대학교 석사학위 논문.
  5. 김혜나(2011). CBAM의 실행 측정 도구의 발전과정과 쟁점 분석, 부산대학교 석사학위 논문.
  6. 박주상(1994). 교육과정에 대한 교사들의 관심도와 활용도 연구, 한국교원대학교 석사학위 논문.
  7. 여성아(2011). 초등과학과 자유탐구 영역에 대한 교사의 관심분석, 부산대학교 석사학위 논문.
  8. 장수미.김재영(2002). 교사의 관심도에 기초한 초등 과학과 수행평가의 실태 분석, 초등과학교육 21(2), 227-240.
  9. 정미정(2004). 기술.가정과 수행평가에 대한 중학교 교사들의 관심도와 실행실태 조사, 한국교원대학교 석사학위 논문.
  10. 최진영(1996). 교육과정에 대한 교사들의 관심도 실행형태 및 실행수준의 관계, 이화여자대학교 석사학위논문.
  11. 蔡永紅(2011). 對敎師績效評估硏究的回顧与反思[J], 高等師范敎育硏究, (3), 73-76.
  12. 蔡永紅(2002). 敎師評价硏究的緣起, 問題及發展趨勢[J], 北京師范大學學報, (1).
  13. 蔡永紅, 林崇德(2005). 敎師績效評价的理論与實踐[J], 敎師敎育硏究, 27(1).
  14. 陳玉琨(2006). 敎育評价學[M], 北京 : 人民敎育出版社, 98.
  15. 葛輝(2009). 中國大陸和台湾兩地中小學校師評价指標体系北較硏究. 沈陽師范大學, 碩士學位論文.
  16. 姜紅(2005). 績效評估在敎師職業發展中的應用[J], 敎育探索, (4): 114.
  17. 曲娜(2009). 我國義務敎育階段敎師績效評价硏究, 東北師范大學, 碩士學位論文.
  18. 王敏(2010). 我國高校敎師績效評价的問題及對策趨勢, 蘭州大學, 碩士學位論文.
  19. 吳淸山 等(2002). 敎師績效責任硏究[M], 台北 : 高等敎育出版文化事業有限公司出版, 53.
  20. 楊華(2011). 我國敎師評价方法存在的問題探析及解诀對策[J], 遼宁師范大學學報, (5).
  21. 張洁(2005). 当前我國敎師資格制度存在的問題[J], 中國敎師, (11), 55-56.
  22. 張其志(2006). 敎師評价的矛盾与分析[J], 敎育硏究与實驗, (4): 30-31.
  23. 周朝森(1992). 敎育評价理論的新探索[J], 敎育硏究, (2).
  24. Fullan, M., & Pomfret, A.(1977). Research on curriculum and instruction implementation, Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 335-397. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047002335
  25. Hall, G. E., Wallace, R. C.,& Dossett, W. A. (1973). A developmental conceptualization of the adoption process within educational institutions, Austin, TX: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, the University of Texas at Austin.
  26. Hall, G. E., George, A. A., & Rutherford, W. L.(1977). Measuring stages of concern about the innovation: A mannual for use of the soc questionnarire (Report No. Tm 006 654). Austin: Texas Univ, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 147 342).
  27. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M.(2006). Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes(2th Ed.), Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  28. Hall, G. E. (2010). Technology's Achilles Heel: Achieving High-Quality Implementation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 231-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782550
  29. Heinecke, W., Blasi, L., & Skerker, S.(2000). The process of an evaluation in progress. Measuring the impact of teaching with technology: Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Performance Assessment, Paper Presented at he Secretary's Conference on Educational technology, 2000: Measuring Impacts and Shaping the Future. Alexandria, VA, September 11-12.
  30. Hord, S. M., Rutherford, W. L., Hulling-Austin, L & Hall, G. E.(1987). Takin Charge of Change, Alexanderia, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  31. Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., & Willson, V.(2006).Measurement and assessment in education, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
  32. Stiggins, R. (1994). Student-Centerd Classroom Assessment, New York: Macmillan.
  33. Stiggins, R. J.(1995). Assessment literacy for 21st century, Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 238-245.
  34. Tunks, J. & Weller, K.(2009). Changing practice, changing minds, from arithmetical to application of the concerns-based adoption model (CBAM), Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 72, no. 2, 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9189-x
  35. Vandenberghe, R. (1986). Studying Change in Primary and Secondary Schools in Belgium and the Betherlands, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.