DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Compositional differences of Bojungikgi-tang decoctions using pressurized or non-pressurized extraction methods with variable extraction times

  • Kim, Jung-Hoon (Herbal Medicine Formulation Research Group, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine) ;
  • Seo, Chang-Seob (Herbal Medicine Formulation Research Group, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Sil (Herbal Medicine Formulation Research Group, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Hyeun-Kyoo (Herbal Medicine Formulation Research Group, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine)
  • Received : 2013.06.14
  • Accepted : 2013.07.24
  • Published : 2013.07.30

Abstract

Objectives : In other to determine the optimal extraction conditions, the various Bojungikgi-tang (BJIGT) decoctions prepared by different pressure levels and different extraction times were compared and evaluated in terms of the extract yield and the total soluble solid content. Methods : Decoctions were prepared by the pressure levels of 0 (non-pressurized) and 1 $kgf/cm^2$ (pressurized) for 60, 120 and 180 min. The extract yield and the total soluble solids content of decoctions were measured, and the amounts of the reference compounds in decoctions were investigated by the analysis using high performance liquid chromatography. Results : The extract yield and the total soluble solid content were higher in decoctions extracted by the pressurized method than those from decoction with non-pressurized method. The patterns of yield and contents showed a proportional increase to the extraction time. In analysis of the linear regression for four reference compounds such as liquiritin, nodakenin, hesperidin, and glycyrrhizin, the good linearity with the correlation coefficient more than 0.9999 was observed. The highest contents for four reference compounds were observed at 180 min of both the pressurized method and the non-pressurized method. Conclusions : This study suggests that the pressure in extraction method and the extraction time affect the compositional constituents in BJIGT decoctions. The extraction time of 180 min could be chosen in both pressurized and non-pressurized method as optimal extraction condition.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim JD, Kang YG. National Health Insurance Statistical Yearbook. Seoul : National Health Insurance Corporation, Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. 2010 : 300-1.
  2. Lee JT. Research on Intake of Chinese Medicine by Korean. Seoul : Korea Food and Drug Administration. 2006 : 94.
  3. Tanaka K, Ina A, Ohta Y. Comparative study of chemical constituents of the traditional medicine hochuekkito by LC-MS with multivariate statistical analysis. J Trad Med. 2009 ; 26 : 179-86.
  4. Society of Japanese Pharmacopeia. The Japanese Pharmacopeia. 16th ed. Tokyo : The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Ministerial Notification No. 65. 2011 : 1583.
  5. Lin J. Study on effective components of Huanglian Jiedu decoction in different decoction condition. China Medical Herald. 2010 ; 7: 50-1.
  6. Lee YB, Kook YB, Choi SM. Study on the most effective Yinqiao San by the GC (Gas Chromatography). J Korean Medical Classics. 2006 ; 19: 202-6.
  7. Sumino M, Saito Y, Ikegami F, Hirasaki Y, Namiki T. Extraction efficiency of Shosaikoto (Xiaochaihu tang) and investigation of the major constituents in the residual crude drugs. eCAM. 2012 : 1-7.
  8. Heo J. Dongeuibogan. Seoul : Namsandang. 2007 : 434.
  9. Ken T, Ina A, Ohta Y. Comparative study of chemical constituents of the traditional medicine hochuekkito by LC-MS with multivariate statistical analysis. J Trad Med. 2009 ; 26 : 179-86.
  10. Weon JB, Ma JY, Yang HJ, Lee B, Yun BR, Ma CJ. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of nine major compounds in the Bozhougyiqi-Tang using a high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with a diode array detector and electrospray ionization mass spectrometer. Phcog Mag. 2013 ; 9(35) : 271-82. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1296.113291
  11. Liu B, Guo F, Chang Y, Jiang H, Wang Q. Optimization of extraction of evodiamine and rutaecarpine from fruit of Evodia rutaecaroa using modified supercritical $CO_{2}$. J Chromatogr A. 2010 ; 1217 : 7833-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2010.10.079
  12. Zhong K, Wang Q. Optimization of ultrasonic extraction of polysaccharides from dried longan pulp using response surface methodology. Carbohydr Polym. 2010 ; 80 : 19-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.10.066
  13. Chen R, Meng F, Zhang S, Liu Z. Effects of ultrahigh pressure extraction conditions on yields and antioxidant activity of ginsenoside from ginseng. Sep Purif Technol. 2009 ; 66: 340-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2008.12.026
  14. Prasad KN, Yang B, Zhao M, Ruenroengklin N, Jiang Y. Application of ultrasonication or high-pressure extraction of flavonoids from Litchi fruit pericarp. J Food Process Eng. 2009 ; 32: 828-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4530.2008.00247.x
  15. Zulbadli N, Alwi H, Hamid KHK. Study on important factors affecting the extraction of momordica charantia using pressurized boiling system. ISBEIA. 2011 : 228-31.
  16. Kim JH, Ahn SC, Choi SW, Hur NY, Kim BY, Baik MY. Changes in effective components of ginseng by puffing. J Korean Soc Appl Biol Chem. 2008 ; 51 : 188-93.
  17. Kwak EJ. Development of brown colored rice tea with high GABA content. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr. 2010 ; 29 : 1201-5. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2010.39.8.1201
  18. Prasad KN, Yang E, Yi C, Zhao M, Jiang Y. Effects of high pressure extraction on the extraction yield, total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of longan fruit pericarp. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2009 ; 10: 155-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2008.11.007
  19. Prasad KN, Yang B, Shi J, Yu C, Zhao M, Xue S, Jiang Y. Enhanced antioxidant and antityrosinase activities of longan fruit pericarp by ultra-high-pressure-assisted extraction. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2010 ; 51: 471-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2009.02.033
  20. Joo CG, Lee KH, Park C, Lee BC. Antioxidative activities and composition analysis of Pinus densiflora root by ultra high pressure extraction. J Ind Eng Chem. 2011 ; 17 : 712-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2011.05.018