보건교육건강증진학회지 (Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion)

  • 제30권2호
  • /
  • Pages.93-103
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1229-4128(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2635-5302(eISSN)
한국보건교육건강증진학회 (Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

영국과 한국의 건강도시 사업 평가방법 비교 연구: 리버풀과 원주시를 중심으로

A Comparative Study of Healthy City Project Evaluation in U.K. and Korea: Focusing on Liverpool City and Wonju City

  • 강신희 (연세대학교 보건행정학과) ;
  • 남은우 (연세대학교 의료복지연구소 건강도시연구센터) ;
  • 문지영 (강원대학교병원 예방의학과)
  • Kang, Shin Hee (Department of Health Administration, Graduate School of Yonsei University) ;
  • Nam, Eun Woo (Healthy City Research Center, Institute of Health and Welfare, Yonsei University) ;
  • Moon, Ji Young (Department of Preventive Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2013.04.30
  • 심사 : 2013.06.25
  • 발행 : 2013.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: This study was to compare two healthy cities, Liverpool in England and Wonju in Korea, which evaluated healthy city projects and to reorient evaluation strategy which fits into Korean Healthy cities. Methods: Comparatives analysis was used by reviewing documents, healthy city plan and evaluation report, of two cities. Results: Healthy city projects in two cities, fifteen programs were identical items among twenty-seven but there were differences in seven items for Liverpool and five items for Wonju. In Liverpool evaluation was done by a stakeholder group called Liverpool Local Involvement Network(LINK), while in Wonju by Yonsei Healthy City Research Center. The evaluation tool was two types; quantitative and qualitative analysis. Liverpool mostly used qualitative and added quantitative, vice versa in Wonju. Conclusions: Evaluation plan for Healthy city projects need to be made in the first phase of the projects, instead of in the end. Moreover, it is important to include stakeholder in conducting qualitative analysis for unquantifiable evidence of effectiveness, as well as quantitative analysis.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alliance for Healthy Cities. Retrieved February 10, 2013, from http://www.alliance-healthycities.com.
  2. Barton, H., Grant, M., Miticham, C., & Tsourou, C. (2009) Healthy urban planning in European cities. Health Promotion International, 24(1), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dap059
  3. Burton S. (1999). Evaluation of healthy city projects: Stakeholder analysis of tow projects in Bangladesh. Environment and Urbanization, 11(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789901100205
  4. Coston, C., & Springett, J. (1997). Joint working in the production of a city health plan: The Liverpool experience. Health Promotion International, 12, 9-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/12.1.9
  5. Goumans, M., & Springett, J. (1997). From projects to policy: `Healthy Cities' as a mechanism for policy change for health?. Health Promotion International, 12(4), 311-322. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/12.4.311
  6. Green, G., Acres, J., Price, C., & Tsouros, A. (2009) City health development planning. Health Promotion International, 24(1), 72-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dap057
  7. Green, G, Price, C., Lipp, A., & Priestley, R. (2009) Partnership structures in the WHO European healthy cities project. Health Promotion International, 24(1), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.081117-QUAN-286
  8. Boonekamp, M. M. G., & Colomer, C., Tomas, A., Nunez, A. (1999) Healthy cities evaluation: The co-ordinator perspective. Health Promotion International, 14(2), 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/14.2.103
  9. Hall, C., Davies, J., & Sherriff, N. (2009) Health in the urban environment: a qualitative review of the Brighton and Hove WHO healthy city program. Journal of Urban Healthy, 87(1), 8-28.
  10. Harpham, T., Burton, S., & Blue, I. (2001). Healthy city projects in developing countries: the first evaluation. Health Promotion International, 6(2), 111-125.
  11. Iso, E. (2009) The introduction of health impact assessment in the WHO European healthy cities networks. Health Promotion International, 24(1), 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dap056
  12. Kang, E. J. (2010). Study on the health planning and public policies for creating a healthy city. Planning and Policy, 345, 35-42.
  13. Kim, J. H., Jhang, W. G., Kang, E. J., Koh, K. W., Kim, K. Y., Park, K. J., & Park, Y. H., (2011). Healthy cities approach as a new paradigm of public health policy, Journal of Korean Medical Association, 54(8), 884-891. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2011.54.8.884
  14. Kim, J. M., & Koh, K. W. (2009). Assessment of individual, organizational, environmental capacity for healthy cities. Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion, 26(2), 119-133.
  15. Lafond, L. J., & Heritage, Z. (2009) National networks healthy cities in Europe. Health Promotion International, 24(1), 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dap060
  16. Leeuw, D. E. (1999). Healthy cities: Urban social entrepreneurship for health. Health Promotion International, 14, 261-369. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/14.3.261
  17. Liverpool City. (1996). Liverpool City Health Plan. Liverpool, U.K: Liverpool city.
  18. Liverpool City. (2010). Healthy City?: Report of Liverpool. U.K: Link Healthy City Task and Finish Group.
  19. Nam, E. W. (2007), Review and prospective of the healthy cities in Korea. Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion, 24(2), 123-134.
  20. Nam, E. W., Moon, J. Y., & Lee, A. (2010). Evaluation of healthy city project using SPIRIT checklist: Wonju city case. Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion, 27(5), 15-25.
  21. O'Neill, M., & Simard, P. (2006). Choosing indicators to evaluate healthy cities projects: A political task?. Health Promotion International, 21, 145-152.
  22. Oh, Y. M., Kim, H. J., & Hong, K. S. (2011). Evaluation of the healthy cities in Korea(2008-2010). Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion, 28(3), 99-111.
  23. Park, Y. H. (2013, April). Implementation strategy for evaluation and accreditation of healthy cities in Korea. In D. L. Evelyne (chair), Meeting on Implementation National Accreditation System for Healthy City and Technical Network. Symposium conducted at the meeting of WPRO, Ministry of Health and Welfare, and Soonchunhyang University. Seoul, Korea.
  24. Ritsatakis, A. (2009) Equity and social determinants of health at a city level. Health Promotion International, 24(1), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dap058
  25. Strobl, J., & Bruce, N. (2000). Achieving wider participation in strategic health planning: Experience from the consultation phase of Liverpool's 'City Health Plan'. Health Promotion International, 15, 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/15.3.215
  26. Tsouros, A. (2009) City leadership for health and sustainable development : The World Health Organization European healthy cities network. Health Promotion International, 24(1), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dap050
  27. Webster, P. (1999) Review of the 'City Health Profile' produced by WHO-Healthy Cities- do they present information on health and its determinants and what are their perceived benefits?. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 33, 125-127.
  28. Webster, P., & Lipp, A. (2009) The evolution of the WHO city health profiles: A content review. Health Promotion International, 24(1), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dap055
  29. WHO-EURO. (1997). Twenty steps for developing a healthy cities project (3rd ed.). Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
  30. WHO-EURO. (1998). City health profiles: A review of progress. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
  31. WHO-EURO. (2003) National healthy cities networks : A powerful force for health and sustainable development in Europe. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
  32. Wonju City. (2006). 5 year Plan for healthy city Wonju. Yonsei University, Wonju: Healthy City Research Center
  33. Wonju City. (2010). Development of Healthy City Wonju Vision.. Yonsei University, Wonju: Healthy City Research Center
  34. Yoon, T. H., Choi, M. H., Cheong, K. S., Kim, Y. H., Kim, K. Y., & Jung, B. G. (2011). Priority setting for the healthy city program in Busan using the analytic hierarchy process, Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion, 28(3), 31-42.

피인용 문헌

  1. Healthy City Project in Cienfuegos, Cuba vol.37, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14367/kjhep.2020.37.1.91
  2. The direction of healthy cities through the COVID-19 pandemic experience of Seoul, South Korea vol.37, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14367/kjhep.2020.37.4.1