The Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Developing the Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Beliefs Instrument Korean Version for Secondary Prospective Mathematics Teachers

중등 예비 수학 교사를 대상으로 하는 MTEBI 한글판 개발

  • Ryang, Dohyoung (Dept. Math. & Stat., Univsersity of North Carolina at Greensboro)
  • Received : 2013.03.22
  • Accepted : 2013.05.12
  • Published : 2013.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

MTEBI는 미국에서 초등 예비 교사들의 수학 교수 효능감을 측정하는데 자주 이용되는 척도이다. 이 연구의 목적은 MTEBI를 한국의 중등 예비 교사들에게 사용하는 것이 적합한지를 탐색하는 것이었다. 이를 위하여, 미국에 있는 대학원에 다니며 영어와 국어 둘 다 말할 수 있는 박사 학생 두 명이 MTEBI를 브리슬린의 이론대로 국문으로 번역하였고, 그 뒤에 한국에 있는 다수의 수학 교사 교육자들이 번역된 척도를 면밀하게 검토하였다. 한글판 척도를 먼저 작은 표본에서 초벌 실험하였는데, 두 개 문항이 도구의 신뢰도와 타당도를 현저하게 떨어뜨렸다. 본 연구에서는 이 두 개의 유용하지 못한 문항을 대신할 두 개 문항을 더한 23개 문항으로 구성된 척도에 대하여 정규성, 신뢰도, 요인 타당도 등을 658명의 표본에서 검사하였다. 초벌 연구에서 발견된 두 개의 유효하지 않는 문항은 본 연구에서도 역시 그와 같아서, 그 두 문항은 척도에서 제거되었다. 최종적으로 얻어진 21 문항 척도는 한국의 예비 수학 교사들의 수학 교수 효능감을 측정하는데 적합한 척도이다. 앞으로, MTEBI 한글판을 이용하여 한국에서 교사 효능감에 대한 연구가 활발하게 일어나기를 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Alkhateeb, H. M. (2004). Internal consistency reliability and validity of the Arabic translation of the mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument. Psychological Reports, 94, 833-838. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.94.3.833-838
  2. Bae, B. (2006). LISREL structural equation model: Understanding, practice, and programming. Seoul: Cheongram. (In Korean).
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
  5. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
  6. Brown, A. B. (2012). Non-Traditional Prospective Teachers and Their Mathematics Efficacy Beliefs, School Science and Mathematics, 112(3), 191-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00132.x
  7. Cakiroglu, E (2008). The teaching efficacy beliefs of pre-service teachers in the USA and Turkey, Journal of Education for Teaching, 34(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607470701773457
  8. Czerniak, C. M. (1990). A study of self-efficacy, anxiety, and science knowledge in pre-service elementary teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA, April 8-11.
  9. Enochs, L., Smith, P. L., & Huinker, D. (2000). Establishing factorial validity of the mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 100(4), 194-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17256.x
  10. Evans, B. R. (2011). Content knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy in the mathematics New York City Teaching Fellows (NYCTF) program. School Science and Mathematics, 111(5), 225-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00081.x
  11. Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
  12. Ghaith, G., & Yaghi, H. (1997). Relationships among experience, teacher efficacy, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education 13, 451-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(96)00045-5
  13. Gresham, G. (2008). Mathematics anxiety and mathematics teacher efficacy in elementary prospective teachers. Teaching Education, 19(3), 171-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210802250133
  14. Henson, R. K. (2001, January). Teacher self-efficacy: Substantive implications and measurement dilemmas. Paper presented at annual meeting of the Educational Research Exchange, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas.
  15. Hill, T., & Lewicki, P. (2007). Statistics methods and applications. Tulsa, OK: Statsoft.
  16. Hoy, A. W. (2004). The educational psychology of teacher efficacy. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 153-176.
  17. Hoy, A. W., & Spero, R. B. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), 343-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.007
  18. Lin, H., Gorrell, J., & Taylor, J. (2002). Influence of culture and education on U. S. and Taiwan prospective teachers' efficacy beliefs. Journal of Educational Research 96, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209598789
  19. Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J. (1989). Change in teacher efficacy and student self-and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal of educational Psychology, 81, 247-258 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.247
  20. Moore, W., & Esselman, M. (1992). Teacher efficacy, power, school climate and achievement: A desegregating district's experience. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
  21. Mpofu, E., & Ortiz, S. (2009). Equitable assessment practices in diverse contexts, In E. Grigorenko (Ed.), Multicultural psychoeducational assessment (pp. 41-76). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  22. Osborne, J. W., & Costello, A. B. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9.
  23. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543
  24. Ross, J. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effect of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 17(1), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.2307/1495395
  25. Ryang, D. (2007). Reliability and validity of a Korean-translated Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Beliefs Instrument. Journal of Korea Society of Mathematical Education Series A: The Mathematical Education, 46(3), 263-272. (In Korean).
  26. Ryang, D, Thompson, A., & Craig, S. (2011). Korean mathematics teacher educators' response on the Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Beliefs Instrument. Research in Mathematical Education, 15(4), 315-336.
  27. Soodak, L., & Podell, D. (1993). Teacher efficacy and student problems as factors in special education referral. Journal of Special Education 27, 66-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699302700105
  28. Swars, S. L. (2005). Examining perceptions of mathematics teaching effectiveness among elementary prospective teachers with differing levels of mathematics teacher efficacy. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32(2), 139-147.
  29. Swars, S. L., Daane, C. J., & Giesen, J. (2006). Mathematics Anxiety and Mathematics Teacher Efficacy: What is the Relationship in Elementary Prospective Teachers? School Science and Mathematics, 106(7), 306-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2006.tb17921.x
  30. Swars, S. L., Smith, S. Z., Smith, M. E., & Hart, L. C. (2009). A longitudinal study of effects of a developmental teacher preparation program on elementary prospective teachers' mathematics beliefs. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 47-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9092-x
  31. Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202-248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202
  32. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
  33. Utley, J., Bryant, R., & Moseley, C. (2005). Relationship between science and mathematics teaching efficacy of prospective elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(2), 82-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18040.x

Cited by

  1. Development and Validation of the Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Scale: Confirmatory Factor Analysis vol.53, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2014.53.2.185