Architectural research

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance of Office Workers Under Office Sounds and Various Enclosure Conditions in Open Workplaces

  • Received : 2012.10.22
  • Accepted : 2013.01.17
  • Published : 2013.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Effects of physical attributes of workstation enclosures on the performance of office workers with different difficult levels of office tasks and moods are presented. Performance scores in complex tasks were expected to increase with greater workstation enclosures while those in simple tasks would be the same. Mood ratings were expected to be higher in lower workstation enclosures. Performance of 102 college students on ambient office sounds (45 dBA) with office tasks were measured for 100 minutes under three different workplace enclosures: (1) four foot partitions on two sides; (2) six foot partitions on three sides; and (3) a fully enclosed workstation with eight foot partitions. The tasks were to memorize a paragraph with 130 words (complex task) and to search phone numbers (simple task). The complex task performance in the fully enclosed workstation was increased compared to that in the workstation with four foot partitions (p < 0.001) and to that in the workstation with six foot partitions (p < 0.05). However, occupants in the fully enclosed workstation with office sounds without speech generally gave higher mood ratings. It indicates that closed individual offices may offer important contributions to collaborative work as well as individual productivity. These findings would help design community revise open plan design to increase collaboration among office workers.

Keywords

References

  1. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), Inc. (2001). Chapter 7. Sound and Vibration. In: ASHRAE. Handbook Fundamentals SI Edition 2001. Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE, 7.9-7.11.
  2. American Society of Interior Design (ASID), Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Dynasound, Inc., Miliken & Co. and Steelcase Inc. (1996). Sound Solutions: Increasing Office Productivity Through Integrated Acoustic Planning And Noise Reduction Strategies. Washington, D.C.: ASID.
  3. Banbury, S. and Berry, D. C. (1997). Habituation and dishabituation to speech and office noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3(3), 181-195. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.3.3.181
  4. Becker, F. and Sims, W. (2001). Offices That Work: Balancing Communication, Flexibility and Cost [online]. Cornell University International Workplace Studies Program. Available from: http:// iwsp.human.cornell. edu/file_uploads/offices1_1238256905.pdf [Accessed 21 October 2012]
  5. Block, L. K. and Stokes, G. S. (1989). Performance and Satisfaction in Private versus Nonprivate Work Settings. Environment and Behavior, 21(3), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916589213003
  6. Brill, M., Weidemann, S. and the BOSTI Associates (2001). Disproving Widespread Myths about Workplace Design. Jasper, IN: Kimball International.
  7. Cerami, V. V. (1979). Sound Control in the Open Office: A Guide to Speech Privacy. Muskegon, MI: Shaw-Walker Company.
  8. Croome, D. J. (2000). Creating the Productive Workplace. London; New York: E & FN Spon.
  9. Davenport, T. H. and Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge : how organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  10. Egan, M. D. (2007) Architectural Acoustics. Fort Lauderdale, FL: J. Ross Publishing.
  11. Gamberale, F., Iregren, A. and Kjellberg, A. (1989). SPES: the computerized Swedish Performance Evaluation System: background, critical issues, empirical data, and a users' manual. Solna Sweden: Arbetsmiljoinstitutet.
  12. Gevins, A., Smith, M. E., Leong, H., McEvoy, L., Whitfield, S., Du, R. and Rush, G. (1998). Monitoring Working Memory Load during Computer-Based Tasks with EEG Pattern Recognition Methods. Human factors: the Journal of the Human Factors Society, 40(1), 13.
  13. Hancock, P. A. (1987). Human Factors Psychology. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc.
  14. Hart, S. G. and Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of a multidimensional workload rating scale: Results of empirical and theoretical research. In: P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati, eds., Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam: North-Holland Press. 239-250
  15. Horgen, T. H., et al. (1999). Excellence by design: transforming workplace and work practice. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  16. Hua, Y., Loftness, V., Heerwagen, J., and Powell, K. M. (2011). Relationship between Workplace Spatial Settings and Occupant-Perceived Support for Collaboration. Environment and Behavior, 43(6), 807-826. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510364465
  17. Jones, D. M., Madden, C., and Miles, C. (1992). Privileged Access by Irrelevant Speech to Short-term Memory: The Role of Changing State. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A (4), 645-669.
  18. Jones, D. M. and Smith, A. P. (1992). Handbook of Human Performance. London; San Diego: Academic Press.
  19. Loewen, L. J., and Suedfeld, P. (1992). Cognitive and arousal effects of masking office noise. Environment & Behavior, 24(3), 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916592243006
  20. Memoli, F. (1990). General Offices: Planning. In: J. D. Chiara and J. H. Callender, eds. Time-Saver Standards for Building Types. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 880-884.
  21. Ng, C. F. (1989). Office Worker Performance and Satisfaction: The Effects of Office Noise and Individual Characteristics. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Victoria.
  22. Salame, P. (1982). Disruption of Short-Term Memory by Unattended Speech: Implications for the Structure of Working Memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 150-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90521-7
  23. Sundstrom, E., Town, J.P., Rice, R.W. and Osborn, D.P. (1994). Office noise, satisfaction, and performance. Environment & Behavior, 26(2), 195-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659402600204
  24. Witterseh, T. (2001). Environmental Perception, SBS Symptoms and the Performance of Office Work under Combined Exposures to Temperature, Noise and Air Pollution. Doctoral Dissertation. Technical University of Denmark, Denmark.
  25. Yerkes, R. M. and Dodson, J. D. (1908). The Relation of Strength of Stimulus to Rapidity of Habit Formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology & Psychology, 18, 459-482. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.920180503