International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials

Korea Concrete Institute (한국콘크리트학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Application of the Direct Displacement Based Design Methodology for Different Types of RC Structural Systems

  • Malekpour, Saleh (Department of Structural Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz) ;
  • Dashti, Farhad (Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury)
  • Received : 2012.08.06
  • Accepted : 2013.04.04
  • Published : 2013.06.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigates the direct displacement based design (DDBD) approach for different types of reinforced concrete structural systems including single moment-resisting, dual wall-frame and dual steel-braced systems. In this methodology, the displacement profile is calculated and the equivalent single degree of freedom system is then modeled considering the damping characteristics of each member. Having calculated the effective period and secant stiffness of the structure, the base shear is obtained, based on which the design process can be carried out. For each system three frames are designed using DDBD approach. The frames are then analyzed using nonlinear time-history analysis with 7 earthquake accelerograms and the damage index is investigated through lateral drift profile of the models. Results of the analyses and comparison of the nonlinear time-history analysis results indicate efficiency of the DDBD approach for different reinforced concrete structural systems.

Keywords

References

  1. Badoux, M., & Jirsa, J. O. (1990). Steel bracing of RC frames for seismic retrofitting. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 116(1), 55-74. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:1(55)
  2. Belleri, A. (2009). Displacement based design for precast concrete structures. PhD thesis, University of Toronto.
  3. Blandon, C. A. (2004). Equivalent Viscous Damping for DDBD. MSc Thesis, ROSE School, Pavia, Italy.
  4. Calvi, G. M., & Pavese, A. (1995). Displacement-based design of building structures. In A. S. Elnashai (Ed.), European seismic design practice: Research and application, proceedings of the fifth SECED conference, Chester, United Kingdom, October 26-27 1995 (pp. 127-132). Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
  5. Calvi, G. M., & Kingsley, G. R. (1995). Displacement-based seismic design of multi-degree-of-freedom bridge structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 24, 1247-1266. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290240906
  6. CEN. (1998). Eurocode 8: Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures, prEN-1998-1:200X, Revised Final PT Draft (preStage 49). Brussels, Belgium: Committee European de Normalization.
  7. Chopra, A. K., & Goel, R. K. (2001). Direct displacement-based design: Use of inelastic vs. elastic design spectra. Earthquake Spectra, EERI, 17(1), 47-64. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586166
  8. Fajfar, P. (2000). A nonlinear analysis method for performancebased seismic design. Earthquake Spectra, 16(3), 573-592. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586128
  9. Fardis, M. N., Panagiotakos, T. B., & Telemachos, B. (1997). Displacement-based design of RC buildings: Proposed approach and application. In P. Fajfar & H. Krawinkler (Eds.), Proceedings of the seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes. Bled, Slovenia, June 24-27 1997 (pp. 195-206). Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
  10. FEMA 356. (2002). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington, D.C.:Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  11. Freeman, S. A. (1998). The capacity spectrum method as a tool for seismic design. In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Sept 6-11, Paris, France.
  12. Garcia, R., Sullivan, T. J., & Della Corte, G. (2010). Development of a displacement-based design for steel frame-RC wall buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 14(2), 252-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460902995138
  13. Ghaffarzadeh, H., & Maheri, M. R. (2006a). Cyclic tests on the internally braced RC frames. Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 8(3), 177-186.
  14. Ghaffarzadeh, H., & Maheri, M. R. (2006b). Mechanical compression release device in steel bracing system for retrofitting RC frames. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 5(1), 151-158. doi:10.1007/s11803-006-0626-x.
  15. Ghorbani-Asl, A. (2007). Performance-based seismic design of building structure. Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering. Ottawa-Carleton Institute for Civil Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
  16. Gulkan, P., & Sozen, M. (1974). Inelastic response of reinforced concrete structures to earthquake motions. ACI Journal, 71(12), 604-610.
  17. Higashi, Y., Endo, T., & Shimizu, Y. (1981). Experimental studies on retrofitting of reinforced concrete structural members. In Proceedings of the Second Seminar on Repair and Retrofit of Structures (pp. 126-155). Ann Arbor, MI:National Science Foundation.
  18. Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings, Standard No. 2800, 3rd edition. (2005). Building and Housing Research Center, BHRC-PN S 253.
  19. Jacobsen, L. S. (1930). Steady forced vibration as influenced by damping. Transactions of ASME, 52, 169-181.
  20. Kowalsky, M. J., Priestley, M. J. N., & MacRae, G. A. (1995). Displacement-based design of RC bridge columns in seismic regions. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 24(12), 1623-1643. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290241206
  21. Maheri, M. R., & Ghaffarzadeh, H. (2008). Connection overstrength in steel-braced RC frames. Journal of Engineering Structures, 30, 1938-1948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.12.016
  22. Maheri, M. R., & Sahebi, A. (1997). Use of steel bracing in reinforced concrete frames. Engineering Structures, 19(12), 1018-1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00041-2
  23. Malekpour, S., Ghaffarzadeh, H., & Dashti, F. (2012). Direct displacement-based design of steel-braced reinforced concrete frames. Journal of the Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings. doi:10.1002/tal.1028.
  24. Moehle, J. P. (1992). Displacement-based design of RC structures subjected to earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra, EERI, 8(3), 403-428. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585688
  25. Pennucci, D., Calvi, G. M., & Sullivan, T. J. (2009). Displacement-based design of precast walls with additional dampers. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 13(1), 40-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460902813265
  26. PERFORM-3D User Guide. (2006). Nonlinear analysis and performance assessment for 3D structures, VERSION 4, August 2006. Berkeley, CA: Computers and Structures, Inc.
  27. Pettinga, J. D., & Priestley, M. J. N. (2005). Dynamic behaviour of reinforced concrete frames design with direct displacement-based design. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 9(2), 309-330. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363246905002419
  28. Priestley, M. J. N. (2003). Myths and fallacies in earthquake engineering, revisited, The Mallet Milne Lecture. Pavia, Italy: IUSS Press.
  29. Priestley, M. J. N., & Grant, D. N. (2005). Viscous damping for analysis and design. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 9(Special Issue 2), 229-255. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363246905002365
  30. Priestley, M. J. N., & Kowalsky, M. J. (2000). Direct displacement-based design of concrete buildings. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 33(4), 421-444.
  31. Shibata, A., & Sozen, M. A. (1976). Substitute-structure method for seismic design in R/C. Journal of the Structural Division, 102(1), 1-18.
  32. Sullivan, T. J., Priestley, M. J. N., & Calvi, G. M. (2005). Development of an innovative seismic design procedure for frame-wall structures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 9(Special Issue 2), 279-307. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363246905002407
  33. Sullivan, T. J., Priestley, M. J. N., & Calvi, G. M. (2006). Direct displacement design of frame-wall structures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 10(Special Issue 1), 91-124.
  34. Sullivan, T. J., Priestley, M. J. N., & Calvi, G. M. (2004).Displacement shapes of framewall structures for direct displacement based design. In Proceedings of Japan-Europe 5th Workshop on Implications of Recent Earthquakes on Seismic Risk, Bristol, UK.
  35. Sullivan, T. J., Priestley, M. J. N., & Calvi, G. M. (2009). Introduction to a model code for displacement-based seismic design. In Proceedings, ACES Workshop on Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering. Corfu, Greece.
  36. Tasnimi, A. A., & Masoomi, A. (1999). Evaluation of response of reinforced concrete frames strengthened with steel bracing. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, Iran, (in Farsi).
  37. Youssef, M., Ghaffarzadeh, H., & Nehdi, M. (2007). Seismic performance of RC frames with concentric internal steel bracing. Journal of Engineering Structures, 29, 1561-1568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.08.027

Cited by

  1. A Relative Reliability Approach for Direct Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Partially Prestressed Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures vol.2015, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/234879
  2. The Hysteresis Performance and Restoring Force Model for Corroded Reinforced Concrete Frame Columns vol.2016, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7615385
  3. Reduction of inelastic seismic demands in a mid‐rise rocking wall structure designed using the displacement‐based design procedure vol.26, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1307
  4. Extension of Direct Displacement-Based Design to Include Higher-Mode Effects in Planar Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings vol.22, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5000/eesk.2018.22.5.299
  5. Characteristics of FBD and DDBD techniques for SMRF buildings designed for seismic zone-V in India vol.4, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-018-0040-6
  6. Accounting for Torsional Response in Direct Displacement-based Design of Plan-asymmetric Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings vol.23, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-1739-x
  7. Seismic assessment of RC building frames using direct-displacement-based and force-based approaches vol.5, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00364-1
  8. Reliability-Based Probabilistic Safety Evaluation of Seismic Design Approaches for RC-MR Buildings vol.7, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1061/ajrua6.0001128
  9. Direct-displacement and force-based seismic assessment of RC frame structures vol.7, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-021-00160-z