DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of the correlation between insertion torque and primary stability of dental implants using a block bone test

  • Bayarchimeg, Dorjpalam (Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Namgoong, Hee (Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Byung Kook (Implant R&D Center, Osstem Implant Co.) ;
  • Kim, Myung Duk (Implant R&D Center, Osstem Implant Co.) ;
  • Kim, Sungtae (Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Il (Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Seol, Yang Jo (Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Yong Moo (Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Ku, Young (Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Rhyu, In-Chul (Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Eun Hee (Dental Clinic, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Koo, Ki-Tae (Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry)
  • 투고 : 2012.12.17
  • 심사 : 2013.01.18
  • 발행 : 2013.02.28

초록

Purpose: Implant stability at the time of surgery is crucial for the long-term success of dental implants. Primary stability is considered of paramount importance to achieve osseointegration. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the correlation between the insertion torque and primary stability of dental implants using artificial bone blocks with different bone densities and compositions to mimic different circumstances that are encountered in routine daily clinical settings. Methods: In order to validate the objectives, various sized holes were made in bone blocks with different bone densities (#10, #20, #30, #40, and #50) using a surgical drill and insertion torque together with implant stability quotient (ISQ) values that were measured using the Osstell Mentor. The experimental groups under evaluation were subdivided into 5 subgroups according to the circumstances. Results: In group 1, the mean insertion torque and ISQ values increased as the density of the bone blocks increased. For group 2, the mean insertion torque values decreased as the final drill size expanded, but this was not the case for the ISQ values. The mean insertion torque values in group 3 increased with the thickness of the cortical bone, and the same was true for the ISQ values. For group 4, the mean insertion torque values increased as the cancellous bone density increased, but the correlation with the ISQ values was weak. Finally, in group 5, the mean insertion torque decreased as the final drill size increased, but the correlation with the ISQ value was weak. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the study, it was concluded that primary stability does not simply depend on the insertion torque, but also on the bone quality.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Degidi M, Daprile G, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. Development of a new implant primary stability parameter: insertion torque revisited. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011 Oct 18 [Epub]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00392.x.
  2. Dilek O, Tezulas E, Dincel M. Required minimum primary stability and torque values for immediate loading of mini dental implants: an experimental study in nonviable bovine femoral bone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:e20-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.10.003
  3. Stacchi C, Vercellotti T, Torelli L, Furlan F, Di Lenarda R. Changes in implant stability using different site preparation techniques: twist drills versus piezosurgery: a single-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011 Apr 19 [Epub]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00341.x.
  4. Nedir R, Bischof M, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP, Samson J. Predicting osseointegration by means of implant primary stability. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15: 520-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01059.x
  5. Isoda K, Ayukawa Y, Tsukiyama Y, Sogo M, Matsushita Y, Koyano K. Relationship between the bone density estimated by cone-beam computed tomography and the primary stability of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:832-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02203.x
  6. Bilhan H, Geckili O, Mumcu E, Bozdag E, Sunbuloglu E, Kutay O. Influence of surgical technique, implant shape and diameter on the primary stability in cancellous bone. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:900-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02117.x
  7. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106: 721-64. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836..t01-6-.x
  8. Degidi M, Daprile G, Piattelli A. Primary stability determination by means of insertion torque and RFA in a sample of 4,135 implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010 Sep 17 [Epub]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00302.x.
  9. Degidi M, Perrotti V, Strocchi R, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. Is insertion torque correlated to bone-implant contact percentage in the early healing period? A histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of 17 human-retrieved dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:778-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01599.x
  10. Tabassum A, Meijer GJ, Wolke JG, Jansen JA. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:213-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01823.x
  11. Turkyilmaz I. A comparison between insertion torque and resonance frequency in the assessment of torque capacity and primary stability of Branemark system implants. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:754-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01631.x
  12. Kahraman S, Bal BT, Asar NV, Turkyilmaz I, Tozum TF. Clinical study on the insertion torque and wireless resonance frequency analysis in the assessment of torque capacity and stability of self-tapping dental implants. J Oral Rehabil 2009;36:755-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01990.x
  13. Roze J, Babu S, Saffarzadeh A, Gayet-Delacroix M, Hoornaert A, Layrolle P. Correlating implant stability to bone structure. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1140-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01745.x
  14. Huang HM, Lee SY, Yeh CY, Lin CT. Resonance frequency assessment of dental implant stability with various bone qualities: a numerical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:65-74. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130108.x
  15. Hong J, Lim YJ, Park SO. Quantitative biomechanical analysis of the influence of the cortical bone and implant length on primary stability. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:1193-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02285.x
  16. Dos Santos MV, Elias CN, Cavalcanti Lima JH. The effects of superficial roughness and design on the primary stability of dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011; 13:215-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00202.x
  17. Bischof M, Nedir R, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP, Samson J. Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:529-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01042.x
  18. Trisi P, De Benedittis S, Perfetti G, Berardi D. Primary stability, insertion torque and bone density of cylindric implant ad modum Branemark: is there a relationship? An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:567-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02036.x
  19. Moon SH, Um HS, Lee JK, Chang BS, Lee MK. The effect of implant shape and bone preparation on primary stability. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2010;40:239-43. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2010.40.5.239
  20. Hsu JT, Fuh LJ, Tu MG, Li YF, Chen KT, Huang HL. The effects of cortical bone thickness and trabecular bone strength on noninvasive measures of the implant primary stability using synthetic bone models. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011 May 20 [Epub]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00349.x.
  21. Merheb J, Van Assche N, Coucke W, Jacobs R, Naert I, Quirynen M. Relationship between cortical bone thickness or computerized tomography-derived bone density values and implant stability. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:612-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01880.x
  22. Khayat PG, Arnal HM, Tourbah BI, Sennerby L. Clinical outcome of dental implants placed with high insertion torques (up to 176 Ncm). Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011 May 20 [Epub]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00351.x.
  23. Molly L. Bone density and primary stability in implant therapy. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17 Suppl 2:124-35.
  24. Sim CP, Lang NP. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: I. Instrument positioning, bone structure, implant length. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:598-604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01878.x
  25. Martinez H, Davarpanah M, Missika P, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:423-32. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120501.x
  26. Katsoulis J, Avrampou M, Spycher C, Stipic M, Enkling N, Mericske-Stern R. Comparison of implant stability by means of resonance frequency analysis for flapless and conventionally inserted implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:915-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00326.x
  27. Ostman PO, Hellman M, Sennerby L. Direct implant loading in the edentulous maxilla using a bone density-adapted surgical protocol and primary implant stability criteria for inclusion. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7 Suppl 1:S60-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00076.x

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of Location on Primary Stability and Healing of Dental Implants vol.23, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1097/id.0000000000000019
  2. In Vitro Microstructural Analysis of Dental Implants Subjected to Insertion Torque and Pullout Test vol.25, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201302402
  3. The Effects of Defect Type and Depth, and Measurement Direction on the Implant Stability Quotient Value vol.41, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-13-0031
  4. Bone cement grafting increases implant primary stability in circumferential cortical bone defects vol.45, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2015.45.1.30
  5. Evaluation of local cancellous bone amelioration by poly‐ldl‐lactide copolymers to improve primary stability of dental implants: a biomechanical study vol.26, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12445
  6. Effect of Implant Thread Geometry on Secondary Stability, Bone Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact : A Biomechanical and Histological Analysis. vol.24, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/id.0000000000000269
  7. Intraoperative assessment of bone density and primary implant stability: a new surgical approach vol.83, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0011-8524(15)30080-5
  8. Analysis of the influence of implant shape on primary stability using the correlation of multiple methods vol.19, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1417-4
  9. Comparison of Osteotome and Conventional Drilling Techniques for Primary Implant Stability: An In Vitro Study vol.42, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-15-00176
  10. Current trends to measure implant stability vol.16, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.176539
  11. The effects of bone density and crestal cortical bone thickness on micromotion and peri-implant bone strain distribution in an immediately loaded implant: a nonlinear finite element analysis vol.46, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016.46.3.152
  12. Biomechanical evaluation of oversized drilling technique on primary implant stability measured by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis vol.8, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.52873
  13. Prospective randomized clinical trial of hydrophilic tapered implant placement at maxillary posterior area: 6 weeks and 12 weeks loading vol.8, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.396
  14. Validation of value of actual micromotion as a direct measure of implant micromobility after healing (secondary implant stability). An in vivo histologic and biomechanical study vol.27, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12756
  15. Development and application of a direct method to observe the implant/bone interface using simulated bone vol.5, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2116-6
  16. Implant Stability in the Posterior Maxilla: A Controlled Clinical Trial vol.2017, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6825213
  17. Effects of implant tilting and the loading direction on the displacement and micromotion of immediately loaded implants: an in vitro experiment and finite element analysis vol.47, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2017.47.4.251
  18. Increasing the Stability of Dental Implants: the Concept of Osseodensification vol.21, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1515/bjdm-2017-0023
  19. Comparison of Resonance Frequency Analysis and of Quantitative Ultrasound to Assess Dental Implant Osseointegration vol.18, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051397
  20. Comparison of the maximum hand-generated torque by professors and postgraduate dental students for tightening the abutment screws of dental implants vol.12, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.029
  21. Influence of time on primary stability of dental implants placed with osteotomes due to the elastic properties of peri-implant bone vol.14, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2019.04.004
  22. Biomechanical Effects of a New Macrogeometry Design of Dental Implants: An In Vitro Experimental Analysis vol.10, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb10040047
  23. Factors Influencing Primary and Secondary Implant Stability-A Retrospective Cohort Study with 582 Implants in 272 Patients vol.10, pp.22, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228084
  24. Socket Preservation Using Xenograft Does Not Impair Implant Primary Stability in Sheep: Clinical, Histological, and Histomorphometric Study vol.46, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-19-00237
  25. Evaluating the Primary Stability of Implants by two Different Insertion Methodsin Compromised Bone - A Pilot Study vol.13, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/2058
  26. Comparison of quality of bone and insertion torque values of early implants placed at 6 and 8 weeks in sockets preserved with advanced platelet-rich fibrin: A randomized controlled trial vol.21, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_331_21
  27. Influence of Cortical Layer and Surgical Techniques on the Primary Implant Stability in Low-density Bone:An In Vitro Study vol.22, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3003
  28. Comparative Evaluation of Implant Stability, Insertion Torque, and Implant Macrogeometry in Different Bone Densities Using Resonance Frequency Analysis vol.22, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3118
  29. Implant and prosthesis survival rates of full‐arch immediate prostheses supported by implants with and without bicortical anchorage: Up to 2 years of follow‐up retrospective study vol.32, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13678
  30. Evaluation of Cortical Bone Microdamage and Primary Stability of Orthodontic Miniscrew Using a Human Bone Analogue vol.14, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14081825
  31. Combined effect of undersized surgical technique and axial compression on the primary implant stability and host bone architecture vol.33, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.03.004
  32. Reliability and Correlation of Different Devices for the Evaluation of Primary Implant Stability: An In Vitro Study vol.14, pp.19, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195537