Journal of Computing Science and Engineering

Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers (한국정보과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The MPI CyberMotion Simulator: A Novel Research Platform to Investigate Human Control Behavior

  • Nieuwenhuizen, Frank M. (Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics) ;
  • Bulthoff, Heinrich H. (Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Department of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University)
  • Received : 2013.04.23
  • Accepted : 2013.05.08
  • Published : 2013.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The MPI CyberMotion Simulator provides a unique motion platform, as it features an anthropomorphic robot with a large workspace, combined with an actuated cabin and a linear track for lateral movement. This paper introduces the simulator as a tool for studying human perception, and compares its characteristics to conventional Stewart platforms. Furthermore, an experimental evaluation is presented in which multimodal human control behavior is studied by identifying the visual and vestibular responses of participants in a roll-lateral helicopter hover task. The results show that the simulator motion allows participants to increase tracking performance by changing their control strategy, shifting from reliance on visual error perception to reliance on simulator motion cues. The MPI CyberMotion Simulator has proven to be a state-of-the-art motion simulator for psychophysical research to study humans with various experimental paradigms, ranging from passive perception experiments to active control tasks, such as driving a car or flying a helicopter.

Keywords

References

  1. D. Allerton, Principles of Flight Simulation, Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 2009.
  2. A. T. Lee, Flight Simulation: Virtual Environments in Aviation, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing, 2005.
  3. S. K. Advani, "Flight simulation research at the Delft University of Technology to the benefit of aviation safety," in Aviation Safety: Human Factors, System Engineering, Flight Operations, Economics, Strategies and Management, Utrecht, the Netherlands: VSP International Science Publishers, 1997, pp. 661-674.
  4. R. T. Hays, J. W. Jacobs, C. Prince, and E. Salas, "Flight simulator training effectiveness: a meta-analysis," Military Psychology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 63-74, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327876mp0402_1
  5. J. Burki-Cohen, N. N. Soja, and T. Longridge, "Simulator platform motion: the need revisited," International Journal of Aviation Psychology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 293-317, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0803_8
  6. A. L. Sparko, J. Burki-Cohen, and T. H. Go, "Transfer of training from a full-flight simulator vs. a high level flight training device with a dynamic seat," in Proceedings of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, Toronto, Canada, 2010, paper no. AIAA-2010-8218.
  7. J. C. F. de Winter, D. Dodou, and M. Mulder, "Training effectiveness of whole body flight simulator motion: a comprehensive meta-analysis," International Journal of Aviation Psychology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 164-183, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508414.2012.663247
  8. R. L. Stapleford, R. A. Peters, and F. R. Alex, "Experiments and a model for pilot dynamics with visual and motion inputs," NASA, Washington, DC, NASA contractor report no. CR-1325, 1969.
  9. P. M. T. Zaal, D. M. Pool, J. de Bruin, M. Mulder, and M. M. van Paassen, "Use of pitch and heave motion cues in a pitch control task," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 366-377, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.39953
  10. D. M. Pool, M. Mulder, M. M. van Paassen, and J. C. van der Vaart, "Effects of peripheral visual and physical motion cues in roll-axis tracking tasks," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1608-1622, 2008. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.36334
  11. F. M. Nieuwenhuizen, M. Mulder, M. M. van Paassen, and H. H. Bülthoff, "Influences of simulator motion system characteristics on pilot control behavior," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 667-676, 2013. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.59257
  12. D. Stewart, "A platform with six degrees of freedom," Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, vol. 180, no. 15, pp. 371-378, 1966.
  13. S. K. Advani, "The kinematic design of flight simulator motion-bases," doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands, 1998.
  14. D. Lean and O. H. Gerlach, "Dynamics characteristics of flight simulator motion systems," North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development, Tech. Rep. AR-144, 1979.
  15. J. A. Schroeder, "Helicopter flight simulation motion platform requirements," NASA, Washington, DC, Tech. Rep. NASA/TP-1999-208766, 1999.
  16. H. J. Teufel, H. G. Nusseck, K. A. Beykirch, J. S. Bulter, M. Kerger, and H. H. Bülthoff, "MPI motion simulator: development and analysis of a novel motion simulator," in Proceedings of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit, Hilton Head Island, SC, 2007, paper no. AIAA-2007-6476.
  17. F. Soyka, P. Robuffo Giordano, K. Beykirch, and H. H. Bülthoff, "Predicting direction detection thresholds for arbitrary translational acceleration profiles in the horizontal plane," Experimental Brain Research, vol. 209, no. 1, pp. 95-107, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2523-9
  18. M. Barnett-Cowan, T. Meilinger, M. Vidal, H. Teufel, and H. H. Bulthoff, "MPI CyberMotion Simulator: implementation of a novel motion simulator to investigate multisensory path integration in three dimensions," Journal of Visualized Experiments, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 1-6, 2012.
  19. F. M. Nieuwenhuizen, P. M. T. Zaal, H. J. Teufel, M. Mulder, and H. H. Bülthoff, "The effect of simulator motion on pilot control behaviour for agile and inert helicopter dynamics," in Proceedings of the 35th European Rotorcraft Forum, Hamburg, Germany, 2009.
  20. F. M. Nieuwenhuizen, P. M. T. Zaal, M. Mulder, M. M. van Paassen, and J. A. Mulder, "Modeling human multichannel perception and control using linear time-invariant models," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 999-1013, 2008. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.32307

Cited by

  1. Transforming Civil Helicopters into Personal Aerial Vehicles: Modeling, Control, and Validation vol.40, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002605
  2. Human discrimination of head-centred visual–inertial yaw rotations vol.233, pp.12, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4426-2
  3. Self-motion sensitivity to visual yaw rotations in humans vol.233, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-4161-0
  4. Forced Fusion in Multisensory Heading Estimation vol.10, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127104
  5. Roll rate perceptual thresholds in active and passive curve driving simulation vol.92, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549716637135
  6. Perception of rotation, path, and heading in circular trajectories vol.234, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4638-0
  7. Subsystem identification of multivariable feedback and feedforward systems vol.72, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2016.05.027
  8. Causal Inference in Multisensory Heading Estimation vol.12, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169676
  9. Emulation of pilot control behavior across a Stewart platform simulator vol.36, pp.04, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263574717000662