경도제거용 나노여과막의 표면 특성 분석 및 막오염기작 연구

Surface Characterization of NF membranes for Hardness Removal and Its Implications to Fouling Mechanisms

  • 함상우 (고려대학교 공과대학 건축.사회환경공학부) ;
  • 김영진 (고려대학교 공과대학 건축.사회환경공학부) ;
  • 김충환 (K-water 연구원 상하수도연구소) ;
  • ;
  • 홍승관 (고려대학교 공과대학 건축.사회환경공학부)
  • Ham, Sangwoo (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Youngjin (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Chunghwan (K-water research institute, Water and Wastewater Research Center) ;
  • Shon, Hokyong (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology) ;
  • Hong, Seungkwan (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University)
  • 발행 : 2013.07.30

초록

In recent years, NF (nanofiltration) membrane has been receiving great attention for hardness removal and has begun to replace traditional lime soda ash softening process, particularly in Florida, USA, mainly due to less sludge production and easy operation. This study aimed to provide detailed surface characteristics of various commercial NF membranes by performing sophisticated surface analysis, which would help more fundamentally understand the performance of NF membranes. More specifically, a total of 7 NF membranes from top NF/RO manufacturers in the world were examined for basic performance tests, surface analysis, and fouling potential assessment. The results demonstrated that NF membranes are classified into two groups in terms of surface zeta potential; they are highly negatively charged ones, and neutral and/or less negatively charged ones. Their hydrophobicities, measured by contact angle, varied from hydrophilic to slightly hydrophobic ones. The AFM measurements showed various surface roughness, ranging from 23 nm (smooth) to 162 nm (rough) of average peak height. Lab-scale fouling experiments were performed using feedwater obtained from conventional water treatment plants in the province of Korea, and their results attempted to correlate to surface characteristics of NF membranes. However, unlike typical RO membranes, no clear correlation was found in this study, indicating that fouling mechanisms of NF membrane may be different from those of typical RO membranes, and both cake deposition and pore blocking mechanisms should be considered simultaneously.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ba, C. and Economy, J. (2010). Preparation and Characterization of a Neutrally Charged Antifouling Nanofiltration Membrane by Coating a Layer of Sulfonated Poly(ether ether ketone) on a Positively Charged Nanofiltration Membrane, Journal of Membrane Science, 362, pp. 192-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.032
  2. de la Rubia, A., Rodriguez, M., Leon, V. M., and Prats, D. (2008). Removal of Natural Organic Matter and THM Formation Potential by Ultra- and Nanofiltration of Surface Water, Water Research, 42, pp. 714-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.07.049
  3. Division of Water Resource Management Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). (2010). Desalination in Florida: Technology, Implementation, and Environmental Issues, Division of Water Resource Management Florida Department of Environmental Protection.
  4. Dixon, M. B., Falconet, C., Ho, L., Chow, C. W. K., O'Neil, B. K., and Newcombe, G. (2010). Nanofiltration for the Removal of Algal Metabolites and the Effects of Fouling, Water Science & Technology, 61, pp. 1189-1199. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.903
  5. Dixon, M. B., Falconet, C., Ho, L., Chow, C. W. K., O'Neil, B. K., and Newcombe, G. (2011). Removal of Cyanobacterial Metabolites by Nanofiltration from Two Treated Waters, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 188, pp. 288-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.111
  6. du Nouy P. L. (1925). An Interfacial Tensiometer for Uuniversal Use, The Journal of General Physiology, 7(5), pp. 625-31. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.7.5.625
  7. Eriksson, P., Kyburz, M., and Pergande, W. (2005). NF Membrane Characteristics and Evaluation for Sea Water Processing Applications, Desalination, 184, pp. 281-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.030
  8. Fairbrother, F. and Mastin, H. (1924). Studies in Electro-Endosmosis, Part 1, Journal of the Chemical Society, Transactions, 125, pp. 2319-2330.
  9. Ghizellaoui, S., Chibani, A., and Ghizellaoui, S. (2005). Use of Nanofiltration for Partial Softening of Very Hard Water, Desalination, 179, pp. 315-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.11.077
  10. Gijsbertsen-Abrahamse, A. J., Schmidt, W., Chorus, I., and Heijman, S. G. J. (2006). Removal of Cyanotoxins by Ultrafiltration and Nanofiltration, Journal of Membrane Science, 276(1-2), pp. 252-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.09.053
  11. Hobbs, C., Hong, S., and Taylor, J. (2006). Effect of Surface Roughness on Fouling of RO and NF Membranes During Filtration of a High Organic Surficial Groundwater, Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-AQUA, 55, pp. 559-570. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2006.038
  12. Hong, S. and Elimelech, M. (1997). Chemical and Physical Aspects of Natural Organic Matter (NOM) Fouling of Nanofiltration Membranes, Journal of Membrane Science, 132, pp. 159-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00060-4
  13. Huang, R., Chen, G., Sun, M., and Gao, C. (2009). Preparation and Characterization of Composite NF Membrane from a Graft Copolymer of Trimethylallyl Ammonium Chloride onto Chitosan by Toluene Diisocyanate Cross-Linking, Desalination, 239, pp. 38-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.02.023
  14. Jarusutthirak, C., Mattaraj, S., and Jiraratananon, R. (2007). Influence of Inorganic Scalants and Natural Organic Matter on Nanofiltration Membrane Fouling, Journal of Membrane Science, 287, pp. 138-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.10.034
  15. Lee, S. and Elimelech, M. (2006). Relating Organic Fouling of Reverse Osmosis Membranes to Intermolecular Adhesion Forces, Environmental Science and Technology, 40, pp. 980-987. https://doi.org/10.1021/es051825h
  16. Mody, A. J. (2004). Feasibility of Using Nanofiltration as a Polishing Process for Removal of Cyanobacterial Exudates from Treated Surface Water, University of South Florida, Master's Thesis.
  17. Norberg, D., Hong, S., Taylor, J., and Zhao, Y. (2007). Surface Characterization and Performance Ealuation of Commercial Fouling Resistant Low-Pressure RO Membranes, Desalination, 202, pp. 45-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.12.037
  18. Park, H. K. (2012). Current Status of Algal Blooms and Their Effects in Korea, Proceedings of the 2012 Spring Co-Conference of the Korean Society on Water Environment and Korean Society of Water and Wastewater, Korean Society on Water Environment and Korean Society of Water and Wastewater, pp. 938-939.
  19. Park, J. E., Jang, H. N., Lee, D. S., Kim, C. H., Lim, J. L., and Jung, J. H. (2007). Effect of Algae Growth on the Operation Properties of Drinking Water Treatment System combined with Membrane, Proceedings of the 2007 Autumn Co-Conference of the Korean Society on Water Environment and Korean Society of Water and Wastewater, Korean Society on Water Environment and Korean Society of Water and Wastewater, pp. 126-130.
  20. Reiss, C. R., Tayler, J. S., and Robert, C. (1999). Surface Water Treatment Using Nanofiltration - Pilot Testing Results and Design Considerations, Desalination, 125, pp. 97-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(99)00127-7
  21. Sayed, S., Tarek, S., Dijkstra, I., and Moerman, C. (2007). Optimum Operation Conditions of Direct Capillary Nanofiltration for Wastewater Treatment, Desalination, 214, pp. 215-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.07.014
  22. Tang, C., Kwon, Y., and Leckie, J. (2007). Probing the Nanoand Micro-Scales of Reverse Osmosis Membranes - A Comprehensive Characterization of Physiochemical Properties of Uncoated and Coated Membranes by XPS, TEM, ATRFTIR, and Streaming Potential Measurements, Journal of Membrane Science, 287, pp. 146-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.10.038
  23. Teixeira, M. R. and Rosa, M. J. (2005). Microcystins Removal by Nanofiltration Membranes, Separation and Purification Technology, 46, pp. 192-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2005.05.013
  24. Teixeira, M. R. and Rosa, M. J. (2006). Neurotoxic and Hepatotoxic Cyanotoxins Removal by Nanofiltration, Water Research, 40, pp. 2837-2846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.05.035
  25. Tretinnikov, O. N. and Ikada, Y. (1994). Dynamic Wetting and Contact Angle Hysteresis of Polymer Surfaces Studied with the Modified Wilhelmy Alance Method, Langmuir, 10(5), pp. 1606-1614. https://doi.org/10.1021/la00017a047
  26. Van der Bruggen, B. and Vandecasteele, C. (2003). Removal of Pollutants from Surface Water and Groundwater by Nanofiltration: Overview of Possible Applications in the Drinking Water Industry, Environmental Pollution, 122, pp. 435-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(02)00308-1
  27. Vrijenhoek, E. M., Hong, S., and Elimelech, M. (2001). Influence of Membrane Surface Properties on Initial Rate of Colloidal Fouling of Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Membranes, Journal of Membrane Science, 188, pp. 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00376-3
  28. Watson, B. M. and Hornburg, C. D. (1989). Low-Energy Membrane Nanofiltration for Removal of Color, Organics and Hardness from Drinking Water Supplies, Desalination, 72, pp. 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-9164(89)80024-4
  29. Yang, J. E. and Choi, S. I. (2011). The Effect of Antiscalant in $Ca^{2+}$ Recovery from Concentrate of Nanomembrane Softening Process, Proceedings of the 2011 Spring Co-Conference of the Korean Society on Water Environment and Korean Society of Water and Wastewater, Korean Society on Water Environment and Korean Society of Water and Wastewater, pp. 15-16
  30. Yang, J., Lee, S., Lee, E., Lee, J., and Hong, S. (2009). Effect of Solution Chemistry on the Surface Property of Reverse Osmosis Membranes Under Seawater Conditions, Desalination, 247, pp. 148-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.12.020
  31. Yu, Y., Lee, S., and Hong, S. (2010). Effect of Solution Chemistry on Organic Fouling of Reverse Osmosis Membranes in Seawater Desalination, Journal of Membrane Science, 351, pp. 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.01.051