The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of resin cements and primer on retentive force of zirconia copings bonded to zirconia abutments with insufficient retention

  • Kim, Seung-Mi (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine Inha University) ;
  • Yoon, Ji-Young (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine Inha University) ;
  • Lee, Myung-Hyun (Energy & Environmental Division, Korea Institute of Ceramic Engineering and Technology (KICET)) ;
  • Oh, Nam-Sik (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine Inha University)
  • Received : 2013.01.10
  • Accepted : 2013.05.20
  • Published : 2013.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of resin cements and primer on the retentive force of zirconia copings bonded to zirconia abutments with insufficient retention. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Zirconia blocks (Lava, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) were obtained and forty sets of zirconia abutments and copings were fabricated using CAD/CAM technology. They were grouped into 4 categories as follows, depending on the types of resin cements used, and whether the primer is applied or not:Panavia F2.0 (P), Panavia F2.0 using Primer (PRIME Plus, Bisco Inc, Schaumburg, IL, USA) (PZ), Superbond C&B (S), and Superbond C&B using Primer (SZ). For each of the groups, the cementation was conducted. The specimens were kept in sterilized water ($37^{\circ}C$) for 24 hours. Retentive forces were tested and measured, and a statistical analysis was carried out. The nature of failure was recorded. RESULTS. The means and standard deviations of retentive force in Newton for each group were $265.15{\pm}35.04$ N (P), $318.21{\pm}22.24$ N (PZ), $445.13{\pm}78.54$ N (S) and $508.21{\pm}79.48$ N (SZ). Superbond C&B groups (S & SZ) showed significantly higher retentive force than Panavia F2.0 groups (P & PZ). In Panavia F2.0 groups, the use of primer was found to contribute to the increase of retentive force. On the other hand, in Superbond C&B groups, the use of primer did not influence the retention forces. Adhesive failure was observed in all groups. CONCLUSION. This study suggests that cementation of the zirconia abutments and zirconia copings with Superbond C&B have a higher retentive force than Panavia F2.0. When using Panavia F2.0, the use of primer increases the retentive force.

Keywords

References

  1. Anusavice KJ. Recent developments in restorative dental ceramics. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:72-74; 76-78; 80-84.
  2. Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics in dentistry: historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:18-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90413-8
  3. Blatz MB, Chiche G, Holst S, Sadan A. Influence of surface treatment and simulated aging on bond strengths of luting agents to zirconia. Quintessence Int 2007;38:745-753.
  4. Luthardt RG, Holzhüter M, Sandkuhl O, Herold V, Schnapp JD, Kuhlisch E, Walter M. Reliability and properties of ground Y-TZP-zirconia ceramics. J Dent Res 2002;81:487-491. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100711
  5. Yildirim M, Edelhoff D, Hanisch O, Spiekermann H. Ceramic abutments-a new era in achieving optimal esthetics in implant dentistry. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000;20:81-91.
  6. Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 2003;19:725-731. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00019-8
  7. Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Malament KA, Van Thompson P, Rekow ED. Damage accumulation and fatigue life of particle-abraded ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:442-448.
  8. Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Effect of sandblasting on the long-term performance of dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;71:381-386.
  9. Bottino MA, Valandro LF, Scotti R, Buso L. Effect of surface treatments on the resin bond to zirconium-based ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:60-65.
  10. Dérand P, Dérand T. Bond strength of luting cements to zirconium oxide ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:131-135.
  11. Kern M, Wegner SM. Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater 1998;14:64-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00011-6
  12. Emms M, Tredwin CJ, Setchell DJ, Moles DR. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cementretained, implant-supported restorations. J Prosthodont 2007;16:3-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00150.x
  13. Janda R, Roulet JF, Wulf M, Tiller HJ. A new adhesive technology for all-ceramics. Dent Mater 2003;19:567-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00106-9
  14. Lüthy H, Loeffel O, Hammerle CH. Effect of thermocycling on bond strength of luting cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 2006;22:195-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.016
  15. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Martin J, Lang B. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths of resin to densely-sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic after long-term storage and thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:356-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.001
  16. Atsu SS, Kilicarslan MA, Kucukesmen HC, Aka PS. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:430-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.016
  17. Ozcan M, Nijhuis H, Valandro LF. Effect of various surface conditioning methods on the adhesion of dual-cure resin cement with MDP functional monomer to zirconia after thermal aging. Dent Mater J 2008;27:99-104. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.99
  18. Wegner SM, Kern M. Long-term resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:139-147.
  19. Ernst CP, Cohnen U, Stender E, Willershausen B. In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:551-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.011
  20. Lee HJ, Ryu JJ, Shin SW, Suh KW. Effect of surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2007;45:743-752
  21. Kim CH, Jeon YC, Jeong CM, Lim JS. Effect of surface treatments of zirconia ceramic on the bond strength of resin cements. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2004;42:386-396.
  22. Lindgren J, Smeds J, Sjogren G. Effect of surface treatments and aging in water on bond strength to zirconia. Oper Dent 2008;33:675-681. https://doi.org/10.2341/08-12
  23. Lee JH, Kim HS, Pae AR, Woo YH. Influence of sandblasting and primer on shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2011;49:49-56. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2011.49.1.49
  24. Magne P, Paranhos MP, Burnett LH Jr. New zirconia primer improves bond strength of resin-based cements. Dent Mater 2010;26:345-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.12.005
  25. Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:719-728.
  26. Abbo B, Razzoog ME, Vivas J, Sierraalta M. Resistance to dislodgement of zirconia copings cemented onto titanium abutments of different heights. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:25-29 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60005-0
  27. Ramp MH, Dixon DL, Ramp LC, Breeding LC, Barber LL. Tensile bond strengths of provisional luting agents used with an implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:510-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70203-9
  28. Covey DA, Kent DK, St Germain HA Jr, Koka S. Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:344-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70138-7
  29. Squier RS, Agar JR, Duncan JP, Taylor TD. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:793-798.
  30. Mansour A, Ercoli C, Graser G, Tallents R, Moss M. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:343-348. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130401.x
  31. Ebert A, Hedderich J, Kern M. Retention of zirconia ceramic copings bonded to titanium abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:921-927.
  32. Thompson JY, Stoner BR, Piascik JR, Smith R. Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now? Dent Mater 2011;27:71-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.022
  33. Behr M, Proff P, Kolbeck C, Langrieger S, Kunze J, Handel G, Rosentritt M. The bond strength of the resin-to-zirconia interface using different bonding concepts. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2011;4:2-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.08.002

Cited by

  1. Efficacy of ceramic repair material on the bond strength of composite resin to zirconia ceramic vol.73, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.946963
  2. Repair bond strength of resin composite to three aged CAD/CAM blocks using different repair systems vol.12, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.3.131