Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition (한국식품영양과학회지)

The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition (한국식품영양과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Quality Characteristics of Black Raspberry Wine Fermented with Different Yeasts

효모의 종류를 달리하여 제조한 Black Raspberry 발효주의 품질 특성

  • Lee, Yoonji (Dept. of Food and Nutrition and Research Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Jae Cheol (Dept. of Food and Nutrition and Research Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hwang, Keum Taek (Dept. of Food and Nutrition and Research Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Ho (National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service) ;
  • Jung, Chang Min (Baesangmyun Brewery Institute Co., Ltd.)
  • 이윤지 (서울대학교 식품영양학과.생활과학연구소) ;
  • 김재철 (서울대학교 식품영양학과.생활과학연구소) ;
  • 황금택 (서울대학교 식품영양학과.생활과학연구소) ;
  • 김동호 (국립농산물품질관리원 시험연구소) ;
  • 정창민 (배상면주가)
  • Received : 2012.12.24
  • Accepted : 2013.03.18
  • Published : 2013.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Four different yeasts (Fermivin (FM), Saf-instant yeast red (SI), Angest wine active dry yeast (AW) and Angest instant yeast high sugar (AI)) were used for the fermentation of black raspberry wine. The amount of reducing sugars in FM (2.7%) and AI (2.8%) were higher than those in SI (2.4%) and AW (2.5%). The amount of glucose (the major free sugar) was higher in AW (2.57 mg/mL) and AI (2.50 mg/mL) than FM (2.03 mg/mL) and SI (1.75 mg/mL). AW (11.95%) had the highest alcohol content, while SI (11.75%) had the lowest. The pH of FM (pH 3.73) was the lowest, and there were no significant differences in total acidity among the samples. The major organic acid in the wines was citric acid (6.71~8.18 mg/mL) and the amount of organic acids depended on the type of yeasts. The amount of malic acid was highest in SI (2.92 mg/mL), and lowest in AI (1.83 mg/mL). The Hunter color test showed that SI was highest in lightness, redness and yellowness, whereas AI was lowest. There were no differences in turbidity between the samples. There were no significant differences in total phenolic contents (TPC) and total anthocyanin contents (TAC). However, the TPC and TAC of black raspberry wines were higher than those in commercial red wines. The antioxidant activities of wines (determined by ABTS and FRAP) increased in the order of FM, AI, AW and SI. It could not be concluded which yeast is adequate for the fermentation of black raspberry wine because any of the tested yeasts showed the best in all the quality characteristics of the wines.

시판 효모 4가지(Fermivin, FM; Saf-instant yeast red, SI; Angest wine active dry yeast, AW; Angest instant yeast high sugar, AI)를 이용하여 복분자 발효주를 제조하고, 품질 특성을 비교하였다. 환원당 함량은 FM(2.7%)과 AI(2.8%)가 SI(2.4%)와 AW(2.5%)보다 높았으며, 검출된 주요 유리당인 glucose의 함량은 AW와 AI에서 유의적으로 높았다. 알코올 함량은 AW(11.95%)에서 가장 높고, SI(11.75%)에서 가장 낮았다. pH는 FM(pH 3.73)에서 가장 낮았으며, 총 산도는 효모별로 차이가 없었다. 모든 시료에서 검출된 주요 유기산은 citric acid였으며, 효모별로 검출된 유기산 함량은 달랐다. Malic acid의 경우 SI(2.92 mg/mL)에서 가장 많았고 AI(1.83 mg/mL)에서 가장 적었다. L, a, b 값은 SI에서 높고 AI에서 낮았으며, 탁도는 효모에 따라 차이가 없었다. 복분자 발효주의 total phenolics와 total anthocyanin 함량은 효모 별로 차이가 없었으나, 국내에서 판매되는 수입산 레드 와인보다 높았다. 항산화능 역시 효모별로 차이가 없었으나 FM, AI, AW, SI 순으로 높았으며, 항산화능 지표에는 total phenolics와 anthocyanin의 함량뿐만 아니라 anthocyanin 조성도 영향을 미쳤다.

Keywords

References

  1. Oh HH, Hwang KT, Kim M, Lee HK, Kim SZ. 2008. Chemical characteristics of raspberry and blackberry fruits produced in Korea. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 37: 738-743. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2008.37.6.738
  2. Choi HS, Kim MK, Park HS, Kim YS, Shin DH. 2006. Alcoholic fermentation of Bokbunja (Rubus coreanus Miq.) wine. Korean J Food Sci Technol 38: 543-547.
  3. KOSIS. Korean Statistical Information Service. http://kosis.kr/nsikor/view/statViewMain10.jsp?task=viewStatTbl&hOrg=&act=new&tblid=DT_12345&orgid=114&language=kor&conn_path (accessed Nov., 22, 2012).
  4. Moon YJ, Lee MS, Sung CK. 2006. Contents of amino acids in raspberry wine using active dry yeast strains. Korean J Food & Nutr 19: 392-397.
  5. Moon YJ, Lee MS, Sung CK. 2005. Physicochemical properties of raspberry wine using active dry yeast strains. Korean J Food & Nutr 18: 302-308.
  6. Choi HS, Kim MK, Park HS, Shin DH. 2005. Changes in physicochemical characteristics of Bokbunja (Rubus coreanus Miq.) wine during fermentation. Korean J Food Sci Technol 37: 574-578.
  7. Miller GL. 1959. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31: 426-428. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030
  8. Nielson SS. 2003. Food Analysis. 3rd ed. Springer, New York, NY, USA. p 220.
  9. Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventós RM. 1999. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol 299: 152-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1
  10. Giusti MM, Wrolstad RE. 2000. Characterization and measurement of anthocyanins by UV-Visible spectroscopy. In Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry. Wrolstad RE, ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA. p F1.2.1-F1.2.13.
  11. Skrede G, Wrolstad RE, Durst RW. 2000. Changes in anthocyanins and polyphenolics during juice processing of highbush bluberries (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). J Food Sci 65: 357-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2000.tb16007.x
  12. Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C. 1999. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic Biol Med 26: 1231-1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3
  13. Benzie IF, Strain JJ. 1996. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of "antioxidant power": the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem 239: 70-76. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1996.0292
  14. Lim JW, Jeong JT, Shin CS. 2012. Component analysis and sensory evaluation of Korean black raspberry (Rubus coreanus Mique) wines. Int J Food Sci Technol 47: 918-926. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2011.02922.x
  15. Song JC, Park HJ, Shin WC. 1997. Changes of Takju qualities by addition of cyclodextrin during the brewing and aging. Korean J Food Sci Technol 29: 895-900.
  16. Kim YJ, Song GC, Lee YH, Jang GH, Jeong ST, Jeong C. 2012. Fruit Wine: Science And Application. Soohaksa, Seoul, Korea. p 384-400.
  17. Lee SJ, Ahn B. 2009. Changes in physicochemical characteristics of black raspberry wines from different regions during fermentation. Korean J Food Sci Technol 41: 662-667.
  18. Mato I, Suarez-Luque S, Huidobro JF. 2005. A review of the analytical methods to determine organic acids in grape juices and wines. Food Res Int 38: 1175-1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2005.04.007
  19. Roh HI, Chang EH, Jeong ST, Jahng KY. 2008. Characteristics of fermentation and wine quality. Korea J Food Preserv 15: 317-324.
  20. Maatta-Riihinen KR, Kamal-Eldin A, Törrönen AR. 2004. Identification and quantification of phenolic compounds in berries of Fragaria and Rubus species (Family Rosaceae). J Agric Food Chem 52: 6178-6187. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf049450r
  21. Manach C, Williamson G, Morand C, Scalbert A, Remesy C. 2005. Bioavailability and bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. I. Review of 97 bioavailability studies. Am J Clin Nutr 81: 230S-242S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/81.1.230S
  22. Jeong JH, Jung H, Lee SR, Lee HJ, Hwang KT, Kim TY. 2010. Anti-oxidant, anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory activities of the extracts from black raspberry fruits and wine. Food Chem 123: 338-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.04.040
  23. Ordidge M, García-Macíasb P, Battey NH, Gordon MH, Hadley P, John P, Lovegrove JA, Vysini E, Wagstaffe A. 2010. Phenolic contents of lettuce, strawberry, raspberry, and blueberry crops cultivated under plastic films varying in ultraviolet transparency. Food Chem 119: 1224-1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.08.039
  24. Wada L, Ou B. 2002. Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of Oregon caneberries. J Agric Food Chem 50: 3495-3500. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf011405l
  25. Choi YM, Yu KW, Han NS, Koh JH, Lee JS. 2006. Antioxidant activities and antioxidant compounds of commercial red wines. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 35: 1286-1290. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2006.35.9.1286
  26. Tulio AZ Jr, Reese RN, Wyzgoski FJ, Rinaldi PL, Fu R, Scheerens JC, Miller AR. 2008. Cyanidin 3-rutinoside and cyanidin 3-xylosylrutinoside as primary phenolic antioxidants in black raspberry. J Agric Food Chem 56: 1880-1888. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf072313k
  27. Shoji T, Yanagida A, Kanda T. 1999. Gel permeation chromatography of anthocyanin pigments from Rose cider and red wine. J Agric Food Chem 47: 2885-2890. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf981311k
  28. Halvorsen BL, Holte K, Myhrstad MCW, Barikmo I, Hvattum E, Remberg SF, Wold AB, Haffner K, Baugerod H, Andersen LF, Moskaug JO, Jacobs Jr DR, Blomhoff R. 2002. A systematic screening of total antioxidants in dietary plants. J Nutr 132: 461-471. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/132.3.461
  29. Moyer RA, Hummer KE, Finn CE, Frei B, Wrolstad RE. 2002. Anthocyanins, phenolics, and antioxidant capacity in diverse small fruits: Vaccinium, Rubus, and Ribes. J Agric Food Chem 50: 519-525. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf011062r
  30. Stratil P, Kuban V, Fojtova J. 2008. Comparison of the phenolic content and total antioxidant activity in wines as determined by spectrophotometric methods. Crech J Food Sci 26: 242-253.
  31. Moon GS, Kwon TW, Ryu SH. 2003. Comparison of antioxidative activities of soybean components by different assays. Korean Soybean Digest 20: 28-36.

Cited by

  1. Physicochemical properties and antioxidant activities of hot waterextracts from medicinal fruit mixture vol.23, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2016.23.2.267
  2. Anti-microbial, Anti-oxidant, and Anti-thrombosis Activities of the Lees of Bokbunja Wine (Rubus coreanus Miquel) vol.25, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2015.25.7.757
  3. Antioxidant Activities of Rubus coreanus Miquel and Morus alba L. Fruits vol.43, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2014.43.3.381
  4. Nutrition Composition and Single, 14-Day and 13-Week Repeated Oral Dose Toxicity Studies of the Leaves and Stems of Rubus coreanus Miquel vol.21, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21010065
  5. Antioxidant Activity and Main Volatile Flavor Components of Mulberry Wine Fermented with Saccharomyces cerevisiae B-8 vol.43, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2014.43.7.1017
  6. Analysis of Biogenic Amines Content and the Main Volatile Flavor Compounds in Black Raspberry Wine Using Traditional Yeast vol.31, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2015.31.3.296
  7. Comparison of Quality Characteristics of ‘Cheonghyang’ Wine fermented with Different Commercial Yeasts vol.26, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2016.12.26.6.543
  8. Quality Characteristics of Takju by Yeast Strain Type vol.27, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2014.27.5.971
  9. Antioxidant Activities of Ethanol Extracts from Different Parts of the Black Raspberry (Rubus occidentalis) Obtained Using Ultra-sonication vol.47, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2015.47.4.504
  10. Quality Characteristics of Korean Black Raspberry Bokbunja Wines Produced Using Different Amounts of Water in the Fermentation Process vol.46, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2014.46.1.33
  11. Quality Characteristics of Black Raspberry Wine added with wild grape by Yeast Strains and Fermentation Conditions vol.16, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.5.3361
  12. Characteristics of Yakju fermented using different commercial yeasts vol.25, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2018.25.6.715
  13. Characterization of Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from black raspberry and their effect on BALB/c mice gut microbiota pp.2092-6456, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-018-0420-3
  14. Isolation and molecular identification for autochthonous starter Saccharomyces cerevisiae with low biogenic amine synthesis for black raspberry (Rubus coreanus Miquel) wine fermentation pp.1349-8037, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.2018.09.004
  15. Comparison of Physicochemical Pork Quality of Berkshires Supplemented with Rubus coreanus By-product vol.54, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14397/jals.2020.54.5.81