DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

호놀룰루 전략과 우리나라 해양쓰레기 관리를 위한 시사점

The Honolulu Strategy and Its Implication to Marine Debris Management in Korea

  • 홍선욱 (부경대학교 생태공학과) ;
  • 이종명 (동아시아바다공동체오션) ;
  • 장용창 (동아시아바다공동체오션) ;
  • 강대석 (부경대학교 생태공학과) ;
  • 심원준 (한국해양과학기술원 유류.유해물질 연구단) ;
  • 이종수 (동아시아바다공동체오션)
  • 투고 : 2013.02.21
  • 심사 : 2013.03.21
  • 발행 : 2013.05.25

초록

호놀룰루 전략은 지구적 범위에서 해양쓰레기 문제에 대응하기 위한 종합적이고 체계적인 기본 지침 문서(framework document)이다. 유엔환경계획과 미국 해양대기청이 2011년 공동으로 개최한 제5차 해양쓰레기 국제학술회의를 계기로 작성되었다. 육상기인, 해상기인 그리고 현존 해양쓰레기의 양과 영향 저감을 목표로 교육 홍보, 법제 개선, 기술 개발 등의 분야별로 세부 전략과 성과 평가 지표를 제시하고 있다. 호놀룰루 전략 발표 후 GPA, IMO, CBD 등 관련 국제 기구들은 해양쓰레기 대응 활동을 강화하고 있으며, 유엔 차원에서도 2025년까지 구체적인 행동에 나서기로 하였다. 이러한 변화는 해양쓰레기 관리 국제 체제의 경성법적 성격 강화로 이어질 수 있다. 호놀룰루 전략은 한국의 제2차 해양쓰레기 관리 기본계획 수립 과정에서 예방중심적 접근, 과학적 정책 개발 기법 활용, 지표를 활용한 성과 평가 체제 도입 등에 유용하게 활용될 수 있다.

The Honolulu Strategy is a framework document to address marine debris issue globally. The Fifth International Marine Debris Conference held in March 2011 and organized by NOAA and UNEP catalyzed the development of the Holonulu Strategy. Goals of the Strategy are to reduce the amount and impact of land-based, sea-based, and accumulated marine debris. A set of strategies for each goal were provided for education and awareness, legislation, and alternative technologies. The Strategy also lists indicators that could be used to evaluate outcomes of strategies. The adoption of the Honolulu Strategy by the international community has led the international organizations such as GPA, IMO, and CBD to strengthen their responses to the marine debris issue. UN has also set up specific actions that will be implemented until 2025 through its resolutions on marine debris. Recent global developments related to the marine debris issue might lead to a change in the character of the international marine debris management from the current soft law regime to a mandatory one. The Honolulu Strategy could provide a guideline when the Korean government formulates the Second Basic Plan for Marine Debris Management, especially with its prevention-oriented approaches, utilization of scientific policy development tools, and adoption of evaluation system using performance indicators.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 국토해양부(Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs), 환경부(Ministry of Environment), 농림수산식품부(Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries), 해양경찰청 (Korea Coast Guard), 2009, 제1차 해양쓰레기 관리 기본계획(The 1st Basic Plan on Marine Litter Management), p. 75.
  2. 이종명, 장용창, 홍선욱, 이미정, 2012, 2012 스티로폼 해양 쓰레기 정책 워크숍 보고서(Report on Styrofoam Marine Debris Policy Workshop 2012), 동아시아 바다공동체 오션 (Our sea of East Asia Network), 한국발포스티렌재활용협회 (Korea Foam-Styrene Recycling Association), 영남씨그랜트 센터(Yeong-nam Sea Grant Center), p. 176.
  3. Astudillo, J., Bravo, M., Dumont, C. and Thiel, M., 2009, Detached aquaculture buoys in the SE Pacific: potential dispersal vehicles for associated organisms, Aquatic Biology, 5, 219-231. https://doi.org/10.3354/ab00151
  4. Barnes, D., 2002, Biodiversity - Invasions by marine life on plastic debris, Nature, 416, 808-809. https://doi.org/10.1038/416808a
  5. Boerger, C.M., Lattin, G.L., Moore, S.L. and Moore, C.J., 2010, Plastic ingestion by planktivorous fishes in the North Pacific Central Gyre, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 60, 2275-2278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.08.007
  6. CBD (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity) and GEF (Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel-GEF), 2012, Impacts of Marine Debris on Biodiversity: Current Status and Potential Solutions, Montreal, Technical Series No. 67, p. 61.
  7. Cheshire, A., Adler, E., Barbiere, J., Cohen, Y., Evans, S., Jarayabhand, S., Jeftic, L., Jung, R., Kinsey, S. and Kinsui, E., 2009, UNEP/IOC guidelines on survey and monitoring of marine litter, United Nations Environment Programme, Regional Seas Programme, p. 120.
  8. Coe, J. and Rogers, D., 1997, Marine debris: sources, impacts and solutions: Springer, p. 432.
  9. Denuncio, P., Bastida, R., Dassis, M., Giardino, G., Gerpe, M. and Rodriguez, D., 2011, Plastic ingestion in Franciscana dolphins, Pontoporia blainvillei (Gervais and d'Orbigny, 1844), from Argentina, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62, 1836-1841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.05.003
  10. FOS (Foundations of Success), 2009, Using Conceptual Models to Document a Situation Analysis: An FOS How-To Guide, Foundations of Success, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, p. 18.
  11. Good, T., June, J., Etnier, M. and Broadhurst, G., 2010, Derelict fishing nets in Puget Sound and the Northwest Straits: Patterns and threats to marine fauna. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 60, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.09.005
  12. Hong, S., Lee, J., Jang, Y.C., Kim, Y.J., Kim, H.J., Han, D., Hong, S.H., Kang, D, and Shim, W.J., 2013, Impacts of marine debris on wild animals in the coastal area of Korea, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 66, 117-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.10.022
  13. IMO (International Maritime Organization), 1996, Protocol to the Convention on Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter, 1972 and Resolutions Adopted by the Special Meeting, International Maritime Organization. London, UK.
  14. IMO (International Maritime Organization), 1997, MARPOL 73/78 Consolidated Edition, Articles, Protocols, Annexes, Unified Interpretations of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto, International Maritime Organization (IMO), London, UK.
  15. IMO (International Maritime Organization), 2012, 2012 Guidelines for the Implementation of MARPOL ANNEX V, MEPC 63/23/Add.1, p. 32.
  16. Jacobsen, J., Massey, L. and Gulland, F., 2010, Fatal ingestion of floating net debris by two sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus), Marine Pollution Bulletin, 60, 765-767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.03.008
  17. Krasner, S.D., 1982, Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. International Organization, 36, 185-205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018920
  18. Laist, D.W., 1987, Overview of the biological effects of lost and discarded plastic debris in the marine environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 18, 319-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(87)80019-X
  19. Laist, D.W., 1997, Impacts of marine debris: entanglement of marine life in marine debris including a comprehensive list of species with entanglement and ingestion records, in: Coe, J.M.; Rogers, D.B. (Ed.), 1997, Marine debris: sources, impacts, and solutions, pp. 99-139., Springer, p. 432.
  20. Macfadyen, G., Huntington, T., and Cappell, R., 2009, Abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear, FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper, p. 185.
  21. Margoluis, R., Stem, C., Salafsky, N., and Brown., M., 2009, Using conceptual models as a planning and evaluation tool in conservation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32, 138-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.09.007
  22. Murray, F. and Cowie, P., 2011, Plastic contamination in the decapod crustacean Nephrops norvegicus (Linnaeus, 1758), Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62, 1207-1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.03.032
  23. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) and UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 2011, Honolulu Strategy, p. 50.
  24. Rakestraw, A., 2012, Open Oceans and Marine Debris: Solutions for the Ineffective Enforcement of MARPOL Annex, Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 35, 383-409.
  25. Rees, E. and Southward, A., 2009, Plastic flotsam as an agent for dispersal of Perforatus perforatus (Cirripedia: Balanidae), Marine Biodiversity Records, 2, 4-6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755267208000043
  26. Ryan, P.G., 1987, The incidence and characteristics of plastic particles ingested by seabirds, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 23, 175-206.
  27. Saaty, T.L., 2008, Decision making for leaders: the analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Pa.). p. 343.
  28. UN (United Nations), 2012, Report of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, A/CONF.216/16, p. 120.
  29. UNEP (United Nations Environmental Programme), 1995, Global Programme of Action for the Protection of the Marine Environment from Land-based Activties, UNEP (OCA)/LBA/IG.2/7, adopted on 3 November 1995 by the Intergovernmental Conference which met for that purpose in Washington, D.C., from 23 October to 3, November 1995.
  30. UNEP (United Nations Environmental Programme), 2009, Guidelines on the use of market-based instruments to address the problem of marine litter, Nairobi, UNEP, p. 60.
  31. UNEP (United Nations Environmental Programme), 2009, Marine Litter: A Global Challenge. Nairobi, Kenya, UNEP, p. 232.
  32. UNEP (United Nations Environmental Programme), 2012, Progress in the implementation of UNEP's marine litter activities 2007-2011 and the way forward from 2012 to 2016, UNEP/ GPA/IGR.3/INF/6.
  33. UNGA (United Nations General Assembly), 2003, Fifty-seventh session Agenda item 25 (a), Resolution adopted by the General Assembly 57/141. Oceans and the law of the sea, p. 13.
  34. UNGA (United Nations General Assembly), 2005, Sixtieth session, Agenda item 75 (a), Oceans and the law of the sea, A/60/L.22, p. 19.
  35. van Franeker, J.A., Blaize, C., Danielsen, J., Fairclough, K., Gollan, J., Guse, N., Hansen, P.-L., Heubeck, M., Jensen, J.-K., Le Guillou, G., Olsen, B., Olsen, K.-O., Pedersen, J., Stienen, E.W.M., and Turner, D.M., 2011, Monitoring plastic ingestion by the northern fulmar Fulmarus glacialis in the North Sea, Environmental Pollution, 159, 2609-2615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.06.008
  36. Young, O.R., 1982, Regime dynamics: the rise and fall of international regimes. International Organization, 36, 277-297. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018956

피인용 문헌

  1. Economic Feasibility Analysis of Marine Debris Pollution Abatement Technology Program vol.17, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7846/JKOSMEE.2014.17.4.274