치위생과학회지 (Journal of dental hygiene science)

  • 제13권4호
  • /
  • Pages.487-492
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1598-4478(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2233-7679(eISSN)
한국치위생과학회 (The Korean Society of Dental Hygiene Science)
권호 표지

지르코니아 코어의 표면처리 방법에 따른 도재 축성의 전단결합강도

Shear Bond Strength of Veneering Ceramic and Zirconia Core according to the Surface Treatments

  • 신천호 (가천대학교 보건대학원 보건학과) ;
  • 황성식 (경동대학교 치기공학과) ;
  • 한경순 (가천대학교 보건대학원 보건학과)
  • Sin, Cheon-Ho (Department of Oral Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Gachon University) ;
  • Hwang, Seong-Sig (Department of Dental Technology, Kyung Dong University) ;
  • Han, Gyeong-Soon (Department of Oral Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Gachon University)
  • 투고 : 2013.11.25
  • 심사 : 2013.12.03
  • 발행 : 2013.12.31
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 지르코니아 코어 표면처리 방법에 따른 코어와 도재와의 결합기전을 파악하여 도재 수복물의 문제점을 개선하고자 도재와 동일한 구조의 코어를 제작한 후 코어 표면의 거칠기 처리와 liner 적용 방법을 각각 달리한 4개 군의 전단결합강도의 차이를 분석한 바 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 코어의 표면 거칠기 처리 여부는 표면조도에 영향을 주었다(p<0.001). 2. 지르코니아 코어 표면을 표면 거칠기와 liner를 도포한 군(SLT군)이 23.19 MPa로 가장 높았고, 표면 거칠기만 적용한 군(ST군)이 21.17 MPa였으며, liner만 적용한 군(LT군)은 20.53 MPa였고, 표면 비처리 군(NT군)이 16.46 MPa으로 가장 낮은 값을 나타내(p=0.176) 표면처리에 따른 전단 결합강도에 차이가 있을 가능성을 나타냈다. 또한 표면 거칠기와 liner를 도포한 군(SLT군)과 표면 비처리 군(NT군)에서 두 군 간의 차이는 통계적으로 유의하였다(p<0.05). 3. 계면상태는 SLT군이 ST군과 LT군, NT군에 비해 도재결합의 응집된 상태를 나타냈다. 코어의 표면처리 특히 거칠기 처리는 지르코니아 코어와 도재의 물리적 결합 즉, 전단결합강도를 높일 수 있는 의미있는 과정임을 확인하였다.

This study aimed to illuminate the correlatives between the surface processing of Zirconia core and the shear bond strength. The specimens were made by precipitating for two minutes in color liquid and drying to produce a colored Zirconia core following the manufacturer's instructions. The specimens were divided into 4 subgroups according to the surface treatment-sandblasted+liner treatment, SLT group; sandblasted treatment, ST group; liner treatment, LT group; non treatment (control), NT group. The specimens were put on the device with regard to ISO/TS 11405, then tested the shear bond strength with 1 mm shearing speed per minute using the Instron multi-purpose tester. The collected data was analysed by one way ANOVA and t-test. After applying the liner and sandblast to the Zirconia core, shear bond strength value were SLT (23.19 MPa), ST (21.17 MPa), LT (20.53 MPa) and NT (16.46 MPa) in the order. There was a significant difference in the surface roughness between NT and ST group (p<0.001), and in the compressive shear bond strength between NT and SLT group (p<0.05). Therefore, sandblasted plus liner treatment on pre-sintered substructure increased the bond strength of veneering ceramic, compared with other surface treatments.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Scherrer SS, Kelly JR, Quinn GD, Xu K: Fracture toughness (KIc) of a dental porcelain determined by fractographic analysis. Dent Mater 15: 342-348, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00055-X
  2. Ardlin BI: Transformation-toughened zirconia for dental inlays, crowns and bridges: chemical stability and effect of low-temperature aging on flexural strength and surface structure. Dent Mater 18: 590-595, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00095-1
  3. Beuer F, Naumann M, Gernet W, Sorensen JA: Precision of fit: zirconia three-unit fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Investig 13: 343-349, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0224-6
  4. Della Bona A, Mecholsky JJ Jr, Anusavice KJ: Fracture behavior of lithia disilicate- and leucite-based ceramics. Dent Mater 20: 956-962, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.02.004
  5. De Jager N, de Kler M, van der Zel JM: The influence of different core material on the FEA-determined stress distribution in dental crowns. Dent Mater 22: 234-242, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.034
  6. Aboushelib MN, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ: Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 21: 984-991, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.03.013
  7. Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, et al.: Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up. Quintessence Int 37: 685-693, 2006.
  8. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L: An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 35: 819-826, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.008
  9. Saito A, Komine F, Blatz MB, Matsumura H: A comparison of bond strength of layered veneering porcelains to zirconia and metal. J Prosthet Dent 104: 247-257, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60133-3
  10. Fischer J, Stawarczyk B, Hämmerle CH: Flexural strength of veneering ceramics for zirconia. J Dent 36: 316-321, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.01.017
  11. Kirmali O, Akin H, Kapdan A: Evaluation of the surface roughness of zirconia ceramics after different surface treatments. Acta Odontol Scand Nov 21, 2013. [Epub ahead of print]
  12. Kirmali O, Akin H, Ozdemir AK: Shear bond strength of veneering ceramic to zirconia core after different surface treatments. Photomed Laser Surg 31: 261-268. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2013.3487
  13. Ozkurt Z, Iseri U, Kazazoglu E: Zirconia ceramic post systems: a literature review and a case report. Dent Mater J 29: 233-245, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2009-128
  14. Guazzato M, Quach L, Albakry M, Swain MV: Influence of surface and heat treatments on the flexural strength of Y-TZP dental ceramic. J Dent 33: 9-18, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.07.001
  15. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ: Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent 26: 367-374, 2001.
  16. Lee SS, Lee SH, Ahn JS, Kim MH: A comparative study on the fracture behavior of zirconia, glass infiltrated alumina and PFM full crown system. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 50: 235-242, 2012. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2012.50.4.235