Journal of Technologic Dentistry (대한치과기공학회지)

Korean Academy of Dental Technology (대한치과기공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of surface treatments on the shear bond strength between zirconia ceramic and zirconia veneering ceramics

지르코니아의 표면 처리에 따른 전장용 세라믹과의 전단결합강도

  • Ahn, Jae-Seok (Dept. of Dental Lab. Technology, Gwang-Ju Health University) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Hwan (Dept. of Dental Lab. Technology, Gwang-Ju Health University)
  • Received : 2012.10.22
  • Accepted : 2013.03.15
  • Published : 2013.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this research was to evaluate the shear bond strength of different zirconia veneering ceramics with and without liner glass materials to yttria partially-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline(Y-TZP). Methods: Five co mmercial zirconia veneering ceramics were used in this study, E-Max(EM), Creation ZI(CR), Cercon ceram kiss(CE), Triceram(TR) and Zirkonzahn ICE(ZI). All samples were prepared according to manufacturer's instructions. Experimental industrially manufactured Y-TZP ceramic blocks(diameter: 2.7 mm; height: 13.5 mm) were used in this study. Shear bond strength between zirconia ceramic coping and zirconia veneering ceramics were evaluated by the push-shear bond test. The fracture load data were analyzed using ANOVA and Scheffe's test(${\alpha}$=0.05). The fractured surfaces of zirconia core ceraimc and zirconia veneering ceramics were observed using a scanning electron microscope(SEM). Results: The mean shear bond strengths ranged from 20 MPa ($20.12{\pm}6.34$ MPa) to 66.6 MPa ($66.62{\pm}10.01$ MPa). The Triceram(TRG) showed the highest value and Creation ZI(CR) showed the lowest value. In all groups, Zirconia liner and glass material groups was significantly higher shear bond strength than without liner(P<0.05), with the exception of Cercon ceram kiss(CE)groups. Conclusion: Zirconia bonding materials may have the advantage of improved bond strength between zirconia ceramic core and veneering ceramics.

Keywords

References

  1. Aboushelib MN, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Dent mater, 21, 984-991, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.03.013
  2. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Effect of zirconia type on its bond strength with different veneer ceramics. Journal of Prosthodontics 1-8, 2008.
  3. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all ceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics. Dent Mater, 22, 857-863, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.014
  4. AI-Dohan HM, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Shear strength of core-veneer interface in bi-layered ceramics. J Prosthet Dent, 91, 349-355, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.009
  5. Albakry M, Gluazzato M, Swain MV. Fracture toughness and hardness evaluation of three pressible all-ceramic dental materials. J Dent, 31, 181-188, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00025-3
  6. Andersson M, Oden A. A new all-ceram crown; A dense-sintered high purity alumina coping with porcelain. Acta Odontol Scand, 51, 59-64, 1993. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309041149
  7. Anthony DH, Burnett AP, Smith DL, Brooks MS. Shear test for measuring bonding in cast gold alloy-porcelain composites. J Dent Res, 49, 27-33, 1970. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345700490012601
  8. De Jager N, Pallav P, Feilzer AJ. The influence of design parameters on the FEA-determined stress distribution in CAD/CAM produced allceramic dental crowns. Dent Mater, 21, 242-251, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.013
  9. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dental materials, 24, 299-307, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.007
  10. Derand P, Derand T. Bond strength of luting cements to zirconium oxide ceramics. Int J Prothodont, 13, 131-135, 2000.
  11. Derand T, Molin M, Kvam K. Bond strength of composite luting cement to zirconia ceramic surfaces. Dent Mater, 21, 1158-1162, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.005
  12. Guess PC, Kulis A, Witkowski S, Wolkewitz M, Zhang Y. Shear bond strengths between different zirconia cores and veneering ceramics and their susceptibility to thermocycling. Dental materials, 24, 1556-1567, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.028
  13. Hertlein G, Hoscheler S, Frank S, Suttor D. Marginal fit of CAD/CAM manufactured all ceramic prosthesis. J Dent Res, 80, 42-44, 2001.
  14. ISO 9693. Metal-ceramic bond characterization (Schwickerath crack initiation test). Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 1999.
  15. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. biomaterials, 20, 1-5, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-6
  16. Sadoun M. All ceramic bridges with the slip casting technique. Pressedted at the 7th International Symposium on ceramics, Paris, September, 1988.
  17. Shell JS, Neilsen JP. Study of the bond between gold alloys and porcelain. J Dent Res, 41, 1424-1437, 1962. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345620410062101
  18. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ, Torres TJ, Avera SP. Shear bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. Int J Prosthodont, 4, 17-23, 1991.
  19. Sundh A, Sjogren G. A comparison of fracture strength of yttrium-oxide-partiallystabilized zirconia ceramic crowns with varying core thickness, shapes and veneer ceramics. J Oral Rehabil, 31, 682-682, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01284.x
  20. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ. Marginal fit of alumina- and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent, 26, 367-374, 2001.
  21. Wegner SM, Kern M. Long-term resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. J Adhes Dent, 2, 139-147, 2000.

Cited by

  1. 단일구조 지르코니아(zirconia) 전부도재관의 표면처리에 따른 전장도재와의 전단결합강도 vol.35, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2013.35.2.121