Journal of Forest and Environmental Science

Institute of Forest Science, kangwon National University (강원대학교 산림과학연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Role of Quantitative Traits of Leaf Litter on Decomposition and Nutrient Cycling of the Forest Ecosystems

  • Rahman, Mohammed Mahabubur (United Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Ehime University) ;
  • Tsukamoto, Jiro (Education and Research Center for Subtropical Field Science, Kochi University) ;
  • Tokumoto, Yuji (Graduate School of Bioacgricultuaral Sciences, Nagoya University) ;
  • Shuvo, Md. Ashikur Rahman (Department of Botany, MC College)
  • Received : 2012.08.08
  • Accepted : 2012.12.04
  • Published : 2013.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Decomposition of plant material is an important component in the study of forest ecosystem because of its critical role in nutrient cycling. Different tree species has different nutrient release patterns, which are related to leaf litter quantitative traits and seasonal environmental factors. The quantitative traits of leaf litter are important predictors of decomposition and decomposition rates increase with greater nutrient availability in the forest ecosystems. At the ecosystem level, litter quantitative traits are most often related to the physical and chemical characteristics of the litter, for example, leaf toughness and leaf mass per unit area, and lignin content tannin and total phenolics. Thus, the analysis of litter quantitative traits and decomposition are highly important for the understanding of nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems. By studying the role of litter quantitative traits on decomposition and nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems will provide a valuable insight to how quantitative traits influence ecosystem nutrient dynamics. Such knowledge will contribute to future forest management and conservation practices.

Keywords

References

  1. Aber JD, Melillo JM, McClaugherty CA. 1990. Predicting long-term patterns of mass loss, nitrogen dynamics and soil organic matter formation from initial fine litter chemistry in temperate forest ecosystems. Can J Bot 68: 2201-2208. https://doi.org/10.1139/b90-287
  2. Aerts R. 1997. Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos 79: 439-449. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546886
  3. Alongi DM. 1987. The influence of mangrove-derived tannins on interidal meiobenthos in tropical estuaries. Oecologia 71: 537-540. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379293
  4. Anderson A. 2008. A Comparison of Alder and Douglass Fir Leaf Litter Decomposition. http://ecoplexity.org/files//Anderson_HJAndrewsReport.pdf. Accessed 4 Dec 2012.
  5. Anderson JM, Swift MJ. 1983. Decomposition in Tropical Forest. In: The Tropical Rain Forest, Ecology and Management (Sulton SL, Chadwick AC, Whitemore TC, eds). Blackwell Oxford, pp 289-309.
  6. Baker TT, Lockaby BG, Conner WH, Meier CE, Stanturf JA, Burke MK. 2001. Leaf litter decomposition and nutrient dynamics in four southern forested floodplain communities. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65: 1334-1347. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2001.6541334x
  7. Barnes BV, Zak DR, Denton SR, Spurr SH. 1998. Forest Ecology, Fourth Edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  8. Barta J, Applova M, Vanek D, Kristufkova M, Santruckova H. 2010. Effect of available P and phenolics on mineral N release in acidified spruce forest: connection with lignin-degrading enzymes and bacterial and fungal communities. Biogeochemistry 97: 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-009-9363-3
  9. Berg B, Berg MP, Bottner P, Box E, Breymeyer A, Deanta RC, Couteaux M, Escudero A, Gallardo A, Kratz W, Madeira M, Malkonen E, McClaugherty C, Meentemeyer V, Munox F, Piussi P, Remacle J, Desanto AV. 1993. Litter mass‐loss rates in pine forests of Europe and eastern United States - some relationships with climate and litter quality. Biogeochemistry 20: 127-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00000785
  10. Berg B, Johansson MB, Tjarve I, Gaitniekes T, Rokjanis B, Beier C, Rothe A, Bolger T, Gottlein A, Gertsberger P. 1999. Needle Litterfall in a North European Spruce Forest Transect. Report 80. Reports in Forest Ecology and Forest Soils. Department of Forest Soils, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
  11. Berg B. 2000. Litter decomposition and organic matter turnover in northern forest soils. For Ecol Manage 133: 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00294-7
  12. Berg B, McClaugherty C. 2008. Plant litter: Decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  13. Berg B, Ekbohm G, McClaugherty, C. 1984. Lgnin and holocellulose relations during long-term decomposition of some forest litters. long-term decomposition in a scots pine forest. IV. Can J Bot 1984: 2540-2550.
  14. Boring LR, Hendricks JJ. 1992. Litter quality of native herbaceous legumes in a burned pine forest of the Gerogia Piedmont. Can J For Res 22: 2007-2010. https://doi.org/10.1139/x92-263
  15. Boulton AJ, Boon PI. 1991. A review of methodology used to measure leaf litter decomposition in lotic environments: Time to turn over an old leaf ? Aust J Mar Freshwat Res 42: 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF9910001
  16. Bunt AC. 1988. Media and mixes for container-grown plants. Unwin Hyman, London.
  17. Canhoto C, Graça MA. 1999. Leaf Barriers to Fungal Colonization and Shredders (Tipula lateralis) Consumption of Decomposing Eucalyptus globulus. Microb Ecol 37: 163-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002489900140
  18. Canhoto C, Graca MAS. 1996. Decomposition of Eucalyptus globulus leaves and three native leaf species (Alnus glutinosa, Castanea sativa, Quercus faginea) in a Portuguese low order stream. Hydrobiologia 333: 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00017570
  19. Castells E, Penuelas J, Valentine DW. 2005. Effects of plant leachates from four boreal understorey species on soil N mineralization, and white spruce (Picea glauca) germination and seedling growth. Ann Bot 95: 1247-1252. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci139
  20. Chew I, Obbard JP, Stanforth RR. 2001. Microbial cellulose decomposition in soils from a rifle range contaminated with heavy metals. Environ Pollut 111: 367-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(00)00094-4
  21. Clausen TP, Provenza FD, Burritt EA, Reichardt PB, Bryant JP. 1990. Ecological implications of condensed tannin structure: a case study. J Chem Ecol 16: 2381-2392. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01017463
  22. Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin FS. 1985. Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230: 895-899. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.230.4728.895
  23. Coq S, Jean-Marc S, Meudec E, Cheynier V, Hättenschwiler S. 2010. Interspecific variation in leaf litter tannins drives decomposition in a humid tropical forest in French Guiana. Ecology 91: 2080-2091. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-1076.1
  24. Cornelissen JHC, Perez-Harguindeguy N, Diaz S, Grime JP, Marzano B, Cabido M, Vendramini F, Cerabolini B. 1999. Leaf structure and defense control litter decomposition rate across species and life forms in regional floras on two continents. New Phytol 143: 191-200. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00430.x
  25. Cornelissen JHC, Thompson K. 1997. Functional leaf attributes predict litter decomposition rate in herbaceous plants. New Phytol 135: 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00628.x
  26. Driebe EM, Whitham TG 2000. Cottonwood hybridization affects tannin and nitrogen content of leaf litter and alters decomposition. Oecologia 123: 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050994
  27. Field JA, Lettinga G. 1992. Toxicity of Tannic Compounds to Microorganisms. In: Plant Polyphenols, Synthesis, Properties, Significance (Hemingway RW, Laks RE, Branham SJ, eds). Plenum Press, New York.
  28. Freschet GT, Aerts R, Cornelissen JHC. 2011. A plant economics spectrum of litter decomposability, Funct Ecol 26: 56-65.
  29. Gallardo A, Merino J. 1992. Nitrogen immobilization in leaf litter at two Mediterranean ecosystems of SW Spain. Biogeochemistry 15: 213-228.
  30. Gallardo A, Merino J. 1993. Leaf decomposition in two Mediterranean ecosystems of Southwest Spain: influence of substrate quality. Ecology 74: 152-161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939510
  31. Goncalves JF Jr, Graca MAS, Callisto M. 2006. Litter breakdown dynamics at three streams in temperate, mediterranean and tropical Cerrado climates. North Am Benthol Soc 25: 344-355. https://doi.org/10.1899/0887-3593(2006)25[344:LBISIT]2.0.CO;2
  32. Gorbacheva TT, Kikuchi R. 2006. Plant-to-soil pathways in the subarctic - qualitative and quantitative changes of different vegetative fluxes. Environ Biotech 2: 26-30.
  33. Gould KS, Lee DW. 2002. Anthocyanins and Leaves. The Function of Anthocyanins in Vegetative Organs. Advances in Ecological Research, Vol. 37. Academic Press, London.
  34. Halvorson JJ, Gonzalez JM, Hagerman AE, Smith JL. 2009. Sorption of tannin and related phenolic compounds and effects on soluble-N in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 41: 2002-2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.07.006
  35. Handayanto E, Giller KE, Cadisch G. 1997. Regulating N release from legume tree prunings by mixing residues of different quality. Soil Biol Biochem 29: 1417-1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00047-3
  36. Harrison AF. 1971. The inhibitory effect of oak leaf litter tannins on the growth of fungi, in relation to litter decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 3: 167-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(71)90011-3
  37. Haslam E. 1998. Practical polyphenolics: from structure to molecular recognition and physiological function. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
  38. Hattenschwiler S, Vitousek PM. 2000. The role of polyphenols in terrestrial ecosystem nutrient cycling. Trends Ecol Evol 15: 238-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01861-9
  39. Heal OW, Anderson JM, Swift MJ. 1997. Plant litter quality and decomposition: an historical overview. CAB International, Oxon.
  40. Hissett R, Gray TRG. 1976. Microsites and time changes in soil microbe ecology. In: The role of terrestrial and aquatic organisms in decomposition processes, (Anderson JM, Macfadyen A, eds). pp 23.
  41. Hobbie SE. 1996. Temperature and plant species control over litter decomposition in Alaskan tundra. Ecol Monog 66: 503-522. https://doi.org/10.2307/2963492
  42. Horner JD, Gosz JR, Cates RG. 1988. The role of carbon-based plant secondary metabolites in decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Am Nat 132: 869-883. https://doi.org/10.1086/284894
  43. Howe HF, Westley LC. 1990. Ecological Relationships of Plants and Animals. Oxford University Press, New York.
  44. Huang XH, Jun J, Yan ER. 2004. Leaf litter decomposition of common tree in Tiantongwang. Chin J Plant Ecol 28: 457-467. https://doi.org/10.17521/cjpe.2004.0063
  45. Johansson MB. 1994. Decomposition rates of Scots pine needle litter related to site properties, litter quality, and climate. Can J For Res 9: 1771-1781.
  46. Kalburtji KL, Mosjidis JA, Mamolos AP. 1999. Litter dynamics of low and high tannin sericea lespedesa plants under field conditions. Plant Soil 208: 217-281.
  47. Kavvadias VA, Alifragis DA, Tsiontsis A, Brofas G, Stamatelos G. 2001. Litterfall, litter accumulation and litter decomposition rates in four forest ecosystems in northern Greece. Forest Ecol Manage 144: 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00365-0
  48. Khiewtam RS, Ramakrishnan PS. 1993. Litter and fine root dynamics of a relict sacred grove forest at Cherrapunji in north-eastern India. Forest Ecol Manage 60: 327-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(93)90087-4
  49. Kitayama K, Suzuki S, Hori M, Takyu M, Aiba S, Majalap-Lee N, Kikuzawa K. 2004. On the relationships between leaf-litter lignin and net primary productivity in tropical rain forests. Oecologia 140: 335-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1590-7
  50. Knops JMH, Wedin DA, Naeem S. 2010. The role of litter quality feedbacks in terrestrial nitrogen and phosphorus cycling. The Open Ecol Jour 3: 14-25. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874213001003010014
  51. Knops JMH, Nash TH, Schlesinger WH. 1996. The influence of epiphytic lichens on the nutrient cycling of an oak woodland. Ecol Monog 66: 159-179. https://doi.org/10.2307/2963473
  52. Kraus TEC, Zasoski RJ, Dahlgren RA. 2004. Fertility and pH effects on polyphenol and condensed tannin concentrations in foliage and roots. Plant Soil 262: 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000037021.41066.79
  53. Kraus TEC, Yu Z, Preston CM, Dahlgren RA, Zasoski RJ. 2003. Linking chemical reactivity and protein precipitation to structural characteristics of foliar tannins. J Chem Ecol 29: 703-773. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022876804925
  54. Kurokawa H, Nakashizuka T. 2008. Leaf herbivory and decomposability in a Malaysian tropical rain forest. Ecology 89: 2645-2656. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1352.1
  55. Laishram ID, Yadava PS. 1988. Lignin and nitrogen in the decomposition of leaf litter in a subtropical forest ecosystem at Shiroi hills in north-eastern India. Plant Soil 106: 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02371195
  56. Lambers H. 1993. Rising $CO_{2}$, secondary plant metabolism, plant-herbivore interactions and litter decomposition. Vegetatio 104/105: 263-271. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048157
  57. Lambers H, Chapin FS, Pons TL. 1998. Plant physiological ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  58. Lavelle P, Blanchart E, Martin A, Martin S, Barois I, Toutain F, Spain A, Schaefer R. 1993. A hierarchical model for decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Application to soils in the humid tropics. Biotropica 25: 130-150. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389178
  59. Lin YM, Liu JW, Xiang P, Lin P, Ye GF, Sternberg L, da SL. 2006. Tannin dynamics of propagules and leaves of Kandelia candel and Bruguiera gymnorrhiza in the Jiulong River Estuary, Fujian, China. Biogeochemistry 78: 343-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-005-4427-5
  60. Manuel C, Molles Jr. 2009. Ecology: Concepts and Applications, 5th edition, McGraw-Hill, USA.
  61. Madritch MD, Hunter MD. 2004. Phenotypic diversity and litter chemistry affect nutrient dynamics during litter decomposition in a two species mix. OIKOS 105: 125-131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12760.x
  62. McClaugherty C, Berg B. 2011. Soils and Decomposition. In: eLS. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd: Chichester.
  63. Meentemeyer V. 1978. Macroclimate and lignin control of decomposition rates. Ecology 59: 465-472. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936576
  64. Meier CL, Bowman WD. 2008. Phenolic-rich leaf carbon fractions differentially influence microbial respiration and plant growth. Oecologia 158: 95-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1124-9
  65. Melillo JM, Aber JD, Muratore JF. 1982. Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63: 621-626. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936780
  66. Moraes RM, Delitti WBC, Struffaldi-De Vuono Y. 1999. Litterfall and litter nutrient content in two Brazilian tropical forests. Revta Brasil Bot 22: 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-84041999000100002
  67. Moretti MS, Goncalves JF Jr, Callisto M. 2007. Leaf breakdown in two tropical streams: differences between single and mixed species packs. Limnologica 37: 118-127.
  68. Oladoye AO, Ola-Adams1 BA, Adedire1 MO, Agboola DA. 2008. Nutrient dynamics and litter decomposition in Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) De wit plantation in the nigerian derived savanna. WAJAE 13.
  69. Pal P, Clough TJ, Kelliher FM, Sherlock RR. 2010. Nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide emission responses to litter incorporated in a grassland soil. Aust J Soil Res (Manuscript submitted 12.10.2009).
  70. Palm CA, Sanchez PA. 1991. Nitrogen release from the leaves of some tropical legumes as affected by their lignin and polyphenolic contents. Soil Biol Biochem 23: 83-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(91)90166-H
  71. Paul EA, Clark FE. 1996. Soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
  72. Perez-Harguindeguy N, Diaz S, Cornelissen JHC, Vendramini F, Cabido M, Castellanos A. 2000. Chemistry and toughness predict leaf litter decomposition rates over a wide spectrum of functional types and taxa in central Argentina. Plant Soil 218: 21-30.
  73. Poorter H, Niinemets U, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Villar R. 2009. Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. New Phytol 182: 565-588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02830.x
  74. Prescott CE. 2005. Decomposition and Mineralization of Nutrients from Litter and Humus, In: Nutrient Acquisition by Plants, An Ecological Perspective (BassiriRad H, ed). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  75. Quinn JM, Burrell GP, Parkin SM. 2000. Influences of leaf toughness and nitrogen content on in-stream processing and nutrient uptake by litter in a Waikato, New Zealand, pasture stream and streamside channels. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 34: 253-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.2000.9516931
  76. Rahman MM, Motiur MR. 2012. Quantitative chemical defense traits, litter decomposition and Forest ecosystem functioning. In: Forest Ecosystems: Just more than trees (Blanco AJ, ed). InTech publisher, in press, Croatia, EU. pp 297.
  77. Raich JW, Russell AE, Ricardo BA. 2007. Lignin and enhanced litter turnover in tree plantations of lowland Costa Rica. Forest Ecol Manag 239: 128-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.11.016
  78. Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Modrzynski J, Mrozinski P, Hobbie SE, Eissenstat DM, Chorover J, Chadwick OA, Hale CM, Tjoelker MG. 2005. Linking litter calcium, earthworms and soil properties: a common garden test with 14 tree species. Ecol Lett 8: 811-818. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00779.x
  79. Ribeiro C, Madeira M, Araujo, MC. 2002. Decomposition and nutrient release from leaf litter of Eucalyptus globulus grown under different water and nutrient regimes. Forest Ecol Manage 171: 31-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00459-0
  80. Robbins CT, Hanley TA, Hagerman AE, Hjeljord O, Baker DL, Schwartz CC, Mautz W W. 1987. Role of tannins in defending plants against ruminants: reduction in protein availability. Ecology 68: 98-107. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938809
  81. Salinas N, Malhi Y, Meir P, Silman M, Roman Cuesta R, Huaman J, Salinas D, Huaman V, Gibaja A, Mamani M, Farfan F. 2011. The sensitivity of tropical leaf litter decomposition to temperature: results from a large-scale leaf translocation experiment along an elevation gradient in Peruvian forests. New Phytol 189: 967-977. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03521.x
  82. Salusso MM. 2000. Biodegradation of subtropical forest woods from north-west Argentina by Pleurotus laciniatocrenatus. N Z J Bot 38: 721-724. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.2000.9512712
  83. Sarjubala DA, Yadava PS. 2007. Wood and leaf litter decomposition of Dipterocarpus tuberculatus Roxb. in a tropical deciduous forest of Manipur, Northeast India. Curr Sci 93: 243-246.
  84. Schiesinger WH. 1997. Biogeochemistry. An Analysis of Global Change. 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego, London, Boston, New York, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto.
  85. Schimel JP, VanCleve K, Cates RG, Clausen TP. Reichardt PB. 1996. Effects of balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera) tannins and low molecular weight phenolics on microbial activity in taiga floodplain soil: implications for changes in N cycling during succession. Can J Bot 74: 84-90. https://doi.org/10.1139/b96-012
  86. Singh KP, Singh PK, Tripathi SK. 1999. Litterfall, litter decomposition and nutrient release patterns in four native tree species raised on coal mine spoil at Singrauli, India. Biol Fert Soils 29: 371-378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050567
  87. Sundarapandian SM, Swamy PS. 1999. Litter production and leaf-litter decomposition of selected tree species in tropical forests at Kodayar in the Western Ghats, India. Forest Ecol Manage 123: 231-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00062-6
  88. Tanner EVJ. 1981. The decomposition of leaf litter in Jamaican montane rain orests. J Ecol 69: 263-273. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259830
  89. Tateno R, Tokuchi N, Yamanaka N, Du S, Otsuki K, Shimamura T, Xue Z, Wang S, Hou Q. 2007. Comparison of litterfall production and leaf litter decomposition between an exotic black locust plantation and an indigenous oak forest near Yan'an on the Loess Plateau, China. Forest Ecol Manage 241: 84-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.12.026
  90. Temel S. 2003. Litter decomposition of Picea orientalis, Pinus sylvestris and Castanea sativa trees crown in Artvin in relation to their initial title quality variables. Turkey Agric For 27: 23-243.
  91. Tenney FG, Waksman SA. 1929. Composition of natural organic materials and their decomposition in the soil: IV. The nature and rapidity of decomposition of the various organic complexes in different plant materials under aerobic conditions. Soil Sci 28: 55-84. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-192907000-00005
  92. Valachovic YS, Caldwell BA, Cromack K, Griffiths RP. 2004. Leaf litter chemistry controls on decomposition of Pacific Northwest trees and woody shrubs. Can J For Res 34: 2131-2214. https://doi.org/10.1139/x04-089
  93. Vitousek PM, Turner DR, Parton WJ, Stanford RL. 1994. Litter decomposition on the Mauna LOA environmental matrix, HAWAII: patterns, mechanisms, and models. Ecology 75: 418-429. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939545
  94. Vitousek PM, Sanford RL. 1986. Nutrient cycling in moist tropical forest. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 17: 137-167. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.001033
  95. Vivanco L, Austin AT. 2008. Tree species identity alters forest litter decomposition through long-term plant and soil interactions in Patagonia, Argentina. J Ecol 96: 727-736. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01393.x
  96. Wang Q, Wang S, Huang Y. 2008. Comparisons of litterfall, litter decomposition and nutrient return in monoculture Cunninghamia lanceolata and a mixed stand in Southern China. For Ecol Manag 255: 1210-1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.10.026
  97. Wantzen KM, Machado FA, Voss M, Boriss H, Junk WJ. 2002. Seasonal isotopic changes in fish of the Pantanal wetland, Brazil. Aquat Sci 64: 239-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00013196
  98. Wardle DA. 2002. Communities and ecosystems: linking the above-ground and below-ground components (MPB-34). Princeton University Press, New Jersey, USA.
  99. Wardle DA, Barker GM, Bonner KI, Nicholson KS. 1998. Can comparative approaches based on plant ecophysiological traits predict the nature of biotic interactions and individual plant species effects in ecosystems? J Ecol 86: 405-420. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00268.x
  100. Wardle DA, Bonner KI, Nicholson KS. 1997. Biodiversity and plant litter: experimental evidence which does not support the view that enhanced species richness improves ecosystem function. Oikos 79: 247-258. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546010
  101. Wesemael B, Veer MAC. 1992. Soil organic matter accumulation, litter decomposition and humus forms under mediterranean- type forests in southern Tuscany, Italy. J Soil Sci 43: 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1992.tb00125.x
  102. Wieder WR, Cleveland CC, Townsend AR. 2009. Controls over leaf litter decomposition in wet tropical forests. Ecology 90: 3333-3341. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-2294.1
  103. Wright W, Illius AW. 1995. A comparative study of the fracture properties of five grasses. Funct Ecol 9: 269-278. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390573
  104. Xuefeng L, Shijie H, Yan H. 2007. Indirect effects of precipitation variation on the decomposition process of Mongolian oak (Quercus mongolica) leaf litter. Front Forest Chin 2: 417-423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11461-007-0066-4
  105. Zhou G, Guan L, Wei X, Tang X, Liu S, Liu J, Zhang D, Yan J. 2008. Factors influencing leaf litter decomposition: an intersite decomposition experiment across China. Plant Soil 311: 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9658-5