무역상무연구 (THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE & LAW REVIEW)
- 제57권
- /
- Pages.137-169
- /
- 2013
- /
- 1229-2036(pISSN)
2009년 협회적하약관의 면책조항 상 주요 개정내용에 관한 연구
A Study on the Major Revised Contents in Exclusion Clauses of the Institute Cargo Clauses 2009
- 투고 : 2013.01.30
- 심사 : 2013.02.23
- 발행 : 2013.02.28
초록
This article intends to analyse some features in Exclusion Clauses of the Institute Cargo Clauses 2009 and the results of analysis are following. First, the insufficiency of packing or preparation exclusion under the revised Clause 4.3 is now more limited than before and the Clause suggest the test of sufficiency or suitability "to withstand the ordinary incidents of the insured transit". Secondly, the word "proximately" was deleted under the revised Clause 4.5 for the insurer to be identified more easily as a cause, but it remains to be seen whether that re-drafting will be successful. Thirdly, The exclusion under the revised Clause 4.6 does not apply unless the insurer can prove that, at the time the subject-matter insured is loaded on board the vessel, the assured was aware, or in the ordinary course of business should have been aware, that the relevant insolvency or financial default could prvent the normal prosecution of the voyage, and to a person who purchase the goods from the assured in good faith under a binding contract. Fourthly, the exclusion in respect of unseaworthiness of vessel under Clause 5.1.1 applies only where the assured is privy to the unseaworthiness, whereas the exclusion in respect of unfitness of container or conveyance under Clause 5.1.2 includes the privity of the employee. Finally, Clause 7 establishes the definition of terrorism, and adds ideological and religious motive to political motive.
키워드