DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparison study on the relationship between the Self-reported Voice Problem and Body Mass Index

자가 음성평가와 체질량지수의 특성 비교

  • Lee, Inae (Department of Language Therapy, Luter University) ;
  • Hwang, Young-Jin (Department of Language Therapy, Luter University)
  • 이인애 (루터대학교 언어치료학과) ;
  • 황영진 (루터대학교 언어치료학과)
  • Received : 2012.12.07
  • Accepted : 2013.03.07
  • Published : 2013.03.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the association between self-reported voice problem and body mass index. Data were collected from the 5th Korea National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (2010) from 5,811 subjects(2,503 men and 3,308 women) aged 19 years and olders. chi-square, t-test and multi-nominal logistic regression analysis were used that to compare self-reported voice problem and variable(age, sex, hight, weight, waist measurement, body mass index). body mass index(OR=1.028, 95% CI: 1.003-1.056) was independently associated with self-reported voice problem(p<0.031). also over weight-two step obesity (OR=1.765, 95% CI: 1.036-3.006) were independently associated with self-reported voice problem(p<0.036). The results of comparison verified that body mass index are valuable self-reported voice problem of risk factor. when the evaluation were conducted, what was considered body mass index is needed.

본 연구에서는 자가 음성평가에 따른 체질량지수를 비교하고자 하였다. 제5기(2010년) 1차년도 국민건강영양 조사 이비인후과 검진을 완료한 19세 이상의 성인을 5,811명을 대상으로 하며 자가음성평가와 체질량지수의 연관성을 분석하였다. 또한 체질량지수와 연관성이 깊은 키, 몸무게, 허리둘레 등도 함께 비교하여 자가음성평가와 어떠한 상관을 보이는지 살펴보았다. 비교를 위해 chi-square, t-test, 이변량 로지스틱 회귀분석을 이용하였으며 그 결과, 자가 음성평가에 따른 체질량지수는 유의한 차이를 나타내는 특성을 보이며, 체질량지수가 과체중-2단계 비만인 경우 정상체중보다 음성장애 위험률이 1.77배 높은 결과를 나타내었다. 또한 체질량지수가 음성장애 통제변수로서의 유의함을 확인하였으며, 음성장애 진단 시 키와 몸무게를 통한 체질량지수를 함께 비교하는 것은 필요하다는 것이 확인되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ferrand, C. T., "Speech Science : An integrated approach to theory and clinical practice," Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2007.
  2. Graddol, D., Swann, J., "Speaking fundamental frequency: some physical and social correlates," Lang Speech, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 351-366, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098302600403
  3. Hughes, S. M., Dispenza, F., & Gallup, G. G. Jr., "Ratings of voice attrativeness predict sexual behavior and body configuration," Evolution and Human Behavior, Vol. 25, pp. 295-304, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.06.001
  4. Dawin, C., "The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation in Relation to Sex," London, UK: Murray, 1871. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/12293-000
  5. Kunzel, H. J., "How well does average fundamental frequency correlate with speaker height and weight?," Phonetia. Vol. 46, pp. 117-125, 1989. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000261832
  6. Van Dommelen, W. A,. "Speaker height and weight identification: a reevaluation of some old data," Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 63, pp. 1218-1220, 1978. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381808
  7. Hamdan, A. L., Al-Barazi, R., Tabri, D., Saade, R., Kutkut, I., Sinno, S., & Nassar, J., "Relationship between acoustic parameters and body mass analysis in young males," Journal of Voice, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 144-147, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.01.011
  8. Han, G. L., Park, H. S., & Lee, S. J., "On the correlation between hight, weight and fundamental frequency in adults 20s," Proceedings of 2nd The Korean Academy of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology.Korean Speech-Language & Hearing Association Conference, pp. 132-134, 2011.
  9. Kim, J. O., Im, S. E., Park, S. Y., Choi, S. H., Choi, J. N., & Choi, H. S., "Validity and Reliability of Korean-Version of Voice Handicap Index and Voice-Related Quality of Life," Phonetics and Speech Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 111-125, 2007.
  10. Byeon, H., "A Study on the Relationship between the Self-reported Voice Problems and Voice Disorders in the Adult Populations," Phonetics and Speech Sciences, Vol. 3, No.1, pp. 111-116, 2011.
  11. Ministry of Health and Welfare (2008). The Third Korea National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey 2008, Seoul: Korea, pp. 178-179 2010.
  12. Byeon, H., & Hwang, Y. J. "Gender Differences in Risk Factors of Self-reported Voice Problems," Phonetics and Speech Sciences, Vol. 4, No, 1, pp. 99-108, 2012. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2012.4.1.099
  13. Smith, E., Lemke, J., Tayor, M., Kirchner, H. L., & Hoffman, H., "Frequency of voice problems amang teacher and oher occopations," Journal of Voice, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 480-488, 1988. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(98)80057-X
  14. Oyarzún, P., Sepúlveda, A., Valdivia, M., Roa, I., Cantín, M., Trujillo, G., Zavando, D., & Suazo, G. I., "Variations of the vocal fold epithelium in a menopause induced model," International Journal of Morphology, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 377-381, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022011000200011
  15. Hauser, M. D., Evans, C. S., Marler, P., "The role of articulation in the production of rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) vocalization," Journal of Animal Behaviour, Vol. 45, pp. 423-433, 1993. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1993.1054
  16. Hwang, Y. J., Yu, J. Y., & Jeong, O. R., "Voice and Voice Therapy", Seoul: Sigmapress, 2007.