Journal of Ecology and Environment

The Ecological Society of Korea (한국생태학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of environmental characteristics at Cicuta virosa habitats, an endangered species in South Korea

  • Shin, Cha Jeong (Department of Biology Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Nam, Jong Min (Department of Biology Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Jae Geun (Department of Biology Education, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2012.12.28
  • Accepted : 2013.01.21
  • Published : 2013.03.27
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Cicuta virosa is an endangered species in Korea, which is a southern marginal area. To conserve and restore habitats of this plant, we investigated water and soil environmental characteristics and vegetation at four habitats during the growing season. The C. virosa habitats differed in community structure, water and substrate properties, and water regime. Although the total distribution ranges of the water and soil environments for C. virosa were wide and overlapped with the optimal environmental range of distribution of accompanying species, the optimal water level range for C. virosa was defined as $7{\pm}3.5$ cm. Water level was adjusted by substrate structure such as a mound of P. japonica and a floating mat comprised of accompanying species. A floating mat was an aid to maintain an optimal and stable water level in deep or fluctuating water and to prevent strong competition with prolific macrophytes. The GS sampling site, which had floating mats, could be a good model for C. virosa conservation in a warm temperate region, whereas the PC sampling sites, which experienced a water shortage in spring, provided a clue about the decline in C. virosa population size.

Keywords

References

  1. Allen SE, Grimshaw HM, Parkinson JA, Quarmby C. 1974. Chemical Analysis of ecological materials. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
  2. Boyle J. 2004. A comparison of two methods for estimating the organic matter content of sediments. J Paleolimnol 31: 125-127. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOPL.0000013354.67645.df
  3. Bray RH, Kurtz LT. 1945. Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorous in soil. Soil Sci 59: 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194501000-00006
  4. Byun C, Kwon GJ, Lee D, Wojdak JM, Kim JG. 2008. Ecological assessment of plant succession and water quality in abandoned rice fields. J Ecol Field Biol 31: 213-223. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2008.31.3.213
  5. Canfield RH. 1941. Application of the line intercept method in sampling range vegetation. J Forest 39: 388-394.
  6. Casanova MT, Brock MA. 2000. How do depth, duration and frequency of flooding influence the establishment of wetland plant communities? Plant Ecol 147: 237-250. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009875226637
  7. Coops H, Vulink JT, van Nes EH. 2004. Managed water levels and the expansion of emergent vegetation along a lake-shore. Limnologica 34: 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0075-9511(04)80022-7
  8. Fitter AH. 1982. Influence of Soil Heterogeneity on the Coexistence of Grassland Species. J Ecol 70: 139-148. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259869
  9. Haraguchi A. 1991. Effects of water-table oscillation on redox property of peat in a floating mat. J Ecol 79: 1113-1121. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261102
  10. Haraguchi A. 2004. Seasonal changes in redox properties of peat, nutrition and phenology of Menyanthes trifoliata L.in a floating peat mat in Mizorogaike Pond, central Japan. Aquat Ecol 38: 351-357. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AECO.0000035171.00202.5c
  11. Heegaard E, Birks HH, Gibson CE, S. Smith SJ, Wolfe-Murphy S. 2001. Species–environmental relationships of aquatic macrophytes in Northern Ireland. Aquat Bot 70: 175-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(01)00161-9
  12. Hong MG, Nam JM, Kim JG. 2012. Occupational strategy of runner reed (Phragmites japonica): change of growth patterns with developmental aging. Aquat Bot 97: 30-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2011.11.001
  13. Jang SK, Cheon KS, Jeong JH, Kim ZS, Yoo KO. 2009. Environmental characteristics and vegetation of Megaleranthis saniculifolia Ohwi habitats. Korean J Environ Biol 27: 314-322 (in Korean).
  14. Japanese Wildlife Research Association. 2012. Japanese local red lists http://www.jpnrdb.com/search.php?mode=map&q=06031083218 Accessed 7 Jun 2012 (in Japanese).
  15. Jeon ES. 1999. Role of arboretum and botanical garden as conservation house of wild plants. Native Plants 48: 3438 (in Korean).
  16. Kadlec RH, Knight RL. 1996. Treatment Wetlands. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 102-105.
  17. Kamphake LJ, Hannah SA, Cohen JM. 1967. Automated analysis for nitrate by hydrazine reduction. Water Res 1: 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(67)90011-5
  18. Keddy PA. 1983. Shoreline vegetation in Axe Lake, Ontario: effects of exposure on zonation patterns. Ecology 64: 331-344. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937080
  19. Keddy PA. 1984. Plant zonation on lakeshores in Nova Scotia: a test of the resource specialization hypothesis. J Ecol 72: 797-808. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259532
  20. Kim JG, Park JH, Choi BJ, Sim JH, Kwon GJ, Lee BA, Lee YW, Ju EJ. 2004. Method in Ecology. Bomoondang, Seoul (in Korean).
  21. Kim SN, Lee JS. 2003. Ecological characteristics and growth environment of Korean native water plants. J Korean Flower Res Soc 11: 21-35 (in Korean).
  22. Kingsbury JM. 1964. Poisonous plants of the United States and Canada. Prentice-hall, Inc., New Jersey.
  23. Korean Environment Institute. 2005. A Study for General Planning of Wildlife Protection. Ministry of Environment (in Korean).
  24. Kwon GJ, Lee BA, Byun C, Nam JM, Kim JG. 2006. The optimal environmental range for wetland plants: Zizania latifolia and Typha angustifolia. J Korean Environ Restor Technol 9: 72-88 (in Korean).
  25. Lee CB. 2003. Coloured Flora of Korea. Hyangmoonsa, Seoul (in Korean).
  26. Lee BA, Kwon GJ, Kim JG. 2005. The relationship of vegetation and environmental factors in Wangsuk stream and Gwarim reservoir: 1. water environments. J Ecol Field Biol 28: 365-373. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2005.28.6.365
  27. Lee BA, Kwon GJ, Kim JG. 2007. The optimal environmental ranges for wetland plants: 2. Scirpus tabernaemontani and Typha Latifolia. J Ecol Field Biol 30: 151-159. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2007.30.2.151
  28. Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H. 2003. Aims and Methods of Vegetation of Ecology. Blackburn Press, New York.
  29. Mulligan GA, Munro DB. 1981. The biology of Canadian weeds: 48. Cicuta malaculata L, C. douglasii .DC.. Coult. & Rose and C. virosa L. Can J Plant Sci 61: 93-105. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps81-012
  30. Murphy J, Riley JP. 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chem Acta 27: 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5
  31. National Arboretum. 2009. Korean Rare Plants List (in Korean).
  32. National Weather Services. 2011. Monthly mean temperature and precipitation. http://www.kma.go.kr/weather/observation/past_table.jsp. Accessed 18 Jul 2012 (in Korean).
  33. Nilsson C, Grelsson G, Johansson M, Sperens U. 1989. Patterns of plant species richness along riverbanks. Ecology 70: 77-84. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938414
  34. Nilsson C, Keddy PA. 1988. Predictability of change in shoreline vegetation in a hydroelectric reservoir, Northern Sweden. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 45: 1896-1904. https://doi.org/10.1139/f88-221
  35. Nishihiro J, Miyawaki S, Fujiwara N, Washitani I. 2004. Regeneration failure of lakeshore plants under an artificially altered water regime. Ecol Res 19: 613-623. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1703.2004.00676.x
  36. Panter KE, Keeler RF, Baker DC. 1988. Toxicoses in livestock from the hemlocks (Conium and Cicuta spp.). J Anim Sci 66: 2407-2413.
  37. Sarreveld E. 1975. Cicutoxin poisoning (water hemlock). Neurology 25: 730. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.25.8.730
  38. Sasser CE, Gosselink JG, Shaffer GP. 1991. Distribution of nitrogen and phosphorus in a Louisiana freshwater floating marsh. Aquat Bot 41: 317-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(91)90051-6
  39. Seabloom E, van der Valk A, Moloney K. 1998. The role of water depth and soil temperature in determining initial composition of prairie wetland coenoclines. Plant Ecol 138: 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009711919757
  40. Suh MH, Koh KS, Ku YB, Choi TB, Suh SU, Oh HK, Hyun JO, Koh JG. 2001. Reserch on the Conservation Strategy for the Endangered and Reserved Plants Based on the Ecological and Genetic Characterestics (I). National Institute of Environmental Research (in Korean).
  41. Shay J, de Geus P, Kapinga M. 1999. Changes in shoreline vegetation over a 50-year period in the Delta Marsh, Manitoba in response to water levels. Wetlands 19: 413425
  42. Sheldrick BH, Wang C. 1993. Particle size distribution. In: Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis (Carter MR, ed). Lewis, Florida, pp 499-511.
  43. Solorzano L. 1969. Determination of ammonia in natural waters by the phenolhypochlorite method. Limnol Oceanogr 14: 799-801. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1969.14.5.0799
  44. Song JM, Lee GY, Kim NY, Yi JS. 2010. Vegetation structure and site environment of natural habitat of an endangered plant, Viola websteri. J Korean For Soc 99: 267-276 (in Korean).
  45. Spence DHN. 1967. Factors controlling the distribution of freshwater macrophytes with particular reference to the lochs of Scotland. J Ecol 55: 147-170. https://doi.org/10.2307/2257723
  46. Spence DHN. 1982. The zonation of plants in freshwater lakes. In: Advances in Ecological Research (Macfadyen A, Ford ED, eds). Academic Press, New York, pp 37-125.
  47. Strauss U, Wittstock U, Schubert R, Teuscher E, Jung S, Mix E. 1996. Cicutoxin from Cicuta virosa- a new and potent potassium channel blocker in T Lymphocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 219: 332-336. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1996.0233
  48. Tabacchi E. 1995. Structural variability and invasions of pioneer plant communities in riparian habitats of the middle Adour River (SW France). Can J Bot 73: 33-44.
  49. Tatar S. 2010. Seed longevity and germination characteristics of six fen plant species. Acta Biol Hung 61: 197-205. https://doi.org/10.1556/ABiol.61.2010.Suppl.19
  50. You JH, Cho HW, Jung SG, Lee CH. 2004. Correlation analysis between growth and environmental characteristics in Abeliophyllum distichum habitats. Korean J Environ Ecol 18: 210-220 (in Korean).
  51. Yoon J, Kim H, Nam JM, Kim JG. 2011. Optimal environmental range for Juncus effusus, an important plant species in an endangered insect species (Nannopya pygmaea) habitat in Korea. J Ecol Field Biol 34: 223-235. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2011.024

Cited by

  1. Assessment of genetic diversity and distance of three Cicuta virosa populations in South Korea vol.36, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2013.205
  2. Floating mat as a habitat of Cicuta virosa, a vulnerable hydrophyte vol.11, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-013-0241-8
  3. Analysis of Environmental Characteristics for Habitat Conservation and Restoration of Near Threatened Sparganium japonicum vol.18, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2015.18.1.37
  4. Parnassia palustris population differences in three Korean habitat types vol.13, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-016-0305-7
  5. Establishment strategy of a rare wetland species Sparganium erectum in Korea vol.41, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-017-0045-0
  6. 한국의 묵논에서 멸종위기식물의 복원생태학적 연구 및 서식지 관리방안 vol.22, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.17663/jwr.2020.22.2.81