Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회지)

Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회)
권호 표지

A Study on the Factors of the Next Generation OPAC Functionalities Adoption in Academic Libraries

대학도서관의 차세대 OPAC 기능 수용 요인에 관한 연구

  • 정영미 (동의대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 도태현 (동의대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2013.08.26
  • Accepted : 2013.09.10
  • Published : 2013.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to explore the status of next generation OPAC functionalities adopted by Korean academic libraries, and factors affecting their functionalities adoption. So 181 OPACs among 191 Korean academic libraries' OPACs are surveyed using a checklist consisting of 27 next generation OPAC functionalities. The relationships between the next generation OPAC functionalities adopted by academic libraries' OPAC and 6 factors of library, i.e., establishment, region of universities, volumes in library collection, total library expenditures, total target users, and automation solutions are analyzed by using SPSS Statistics 21. It is found that all factors except establishment of universities significantly affected the adoption of the next generation OPAC functionalities, and further detailed analysis for each factors is provided.

본 연구는 우리나라 대학도서관별 차세대 OPAC 기능 수용 현황을 파악하고, 기능의 수용에 영향을 미치는 요인을 고찰하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 차세대 OPAC 기능 27개로 구성된 체크리스트를 사용하여 191개 대학도서관 중 접속 가능한 181개 대학도서관의 OPAC을 조사하였다. 조사된 도서관의 차세대 OPAC 기능 수용은 SPSS Statistics 21을 사용하여 운영주체, 설치지역, 총예산, 장서량, 이용대상자수, 그리고 도서관자동화시스템 등의 변수와 상관관계를 분석하였다. 세부적인 기능 간에 약간의 차이가 있었지만 대학의 운영주체 변수를 제외한 모든 변수가 차세대 OPAC 기능의 수용에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며 각 요인에 대한 세부적인 분석이 이루어졌다.

Keywords

References

  1. 도태현, 정영미. "대학도서관의 차세대 OPAC 기능 채택과 확산 현황." 한국도서관.정보학회지, 제44권, 제2호(2013. 6), pp.197-215. (Doh, Taehyeon and Jung Youngmi. "A Study on the Next Generation OPAC Functionalities Diffusion Status and Adoption by Academic Libraries." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, Vol.44, No.2(June 2013), pp.197-215.)
  2. 박미성. "Web 2.0 기술 적용 사이트 분석을 통한 도서관 정보시스템의 활용 방안에 관한 연구." 한국도서관.정보학회지, 제39권, 제1호(2008. 3), pp.139-168. (Park, Misung. "A Study on the Practical Application Plans of a Library Information System through Web 2.0 Site Analysis." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, Vol.39, No.1(Mar. 2008), pp.139-168.)
  3. 박종구. "트위터 채택에 관한 통합모델 : 혁신확산이론, 기술수용모델, 혁신저항모델 에 대한 통합적 접근." Internet and Information Security, 제3권, 제1호(2012. 1), pp.35-63. (Park, Bellnine. "Twitter Adoption Model : Integrative Approach to Innovation Diffusion Theory, Technology Acceptance Model, and Model of Innovation Resistance." Internet and Information Security, Vol.3, No.1(Jan. 2012), pp.35-63.)
  4. 이혜영. "대학도서관의 OPAC 2.0 서비스에 대한 이용자 인식조사." 한국도서관.정보학회지, 제43권, 제2호(2012. 6), pp.179-201. (Rhee, Heyyoung. "A Survey of User Perceptions of OPAC 2.0 Service in Academic Library." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society. Vol.43, No.2 (June 2012), pp.179-201.)
  5. Breeding, Marshall. "Next-Generation Library Catalogs." Library Technology Reports, Vol.43, No.4(July/Aug. 2007), pp.5-14.
  6. Chalon, Patrice X., Emmanuel Di Pretoro, and Laurence Kohn. "OPAC 2.0 : Opportunities, Development and Analysis." In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference of Medical and Health Libraries(June 2008), pp.1-11.
  7. Davis, Fred D. "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology." MIS Quarterly, Vol.13, No.3(Sep. 1989), pp.319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  8. Han, Zhiping and Yan Quan Liu. "Web 2.0 Application in Top Chinese University Libraries." Library Hi Tech, Vol.28, No.1(2010), pp.41-62. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011026689
  9. Kim, Yong-Mi and June Abbas. "Adoption of Library 2.0 Functionalities by Academic Libraries and Users : A Knowledge Management Perspective." The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol.36, No.3(May 2010), pp.211-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2010.03.003
  10. Mahmood, Khalid and John V. Richardson Jr. "Adoption of Web 2.0 in US Academic Libraries : A Survey of ARL Library Websites." Program : Electronic Library and Information Systems, Vol.45, No.4(2011), pp.365-375. https://doi.org/10.1108/00330331111182085
  11. Sadeh, Tamar. "User-Centric Solutions for Scholarly Research in the Library." Liber Quarterly, Vol.17, No.3/4(2007), [cited 2013. 4. 22].
  12. Yang, Sharon Q. and Melissa A. Hofmann. "Next Generation or Current Generation? : A Study of the OPACs of 260 Academic Libraries in the USA and Canada." Library Hi Tech, Vol.29, No.2(June 2011), pp.266-300. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831111138170
  13. Venkatesh, Viswanath and Fred D. Davis. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model : Four Longitudinal Field Studies." Management Science, Vol.46, No.2(Feb. 2000), pp.186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  14. Wilson, Katie. "OPAC 2.0 : Next Generation Online Library Catalogues Ride the Web 2.0 Wave!" Online Currents, Vol.21, No.10(2007), pp.406-413.