Factors Which Affect Risk Perception of Medications Containing Asbestos

의약품 사건의 리스크 인식에 영향을 주는 요인: 석면 함유 의약품 사건을 중심으로

  • 전미숙 (삼육대학교 약학대학 약학과) ;
  • 정재훈 (삼육대학교 약학대학 약학과) ;
  • 손애리 (삼육대학교 보건관리학과)
  • Received : 2013.07.10
  • Accepted : 2013.09.17
  • Published : 2013.09.30

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify the factors which affect risk perception and attitude on government risk management over medications containing asbestos among parents of elementary school students. Methods: This research design was cross-sectional study using self-administered questionnaire. The survey subjects were parents of elementary school students in Seoul, total of 1,051 subjects. The survey period was from June through July of 2011. The collected data were analyzed using the SPSS 20.0. Results: The subjects perceived high risk regarding medications containing asbestos. About 83.6% of the subjects perceived that the result taking of medications containing asbestos was fatal, 82.8% felt that medications containing asbestos was a very serious social problem, 79.5% agreed that medications containing asbestos was a new type of threat. The risk perception for medications containing asbestos was related to political affiliation, attitudes of dealing medicines, main use of media, and personal communication credibility. Those who did not believe that the current government policy was correct and the government was working toward the public's benefit and not its own had the higher level of negative attitudes towards the government's risk management over the case of medications containing asbestos. Conclusion: In implementing government policy, all information should be efficiently and accurately communicated through a transparent implementation process. Also, the government must have plans for countermeasures in case of an emergency and respond efficiently in order to maintain their credibility. Moreover, this highlights the need for health authorities to exert more effort in increasing public education/awareness, especially those concerning drug and dug-taking behavior, in order to harness positive attitude and trust towards the government's policy. For a more effective risk communication, the media, health experts, government representatives, and related industries should work together.

Keywords

References

  1. Park JE, Sohn AR. The Relationship between Government Credibility and Risk Perception of the Mad Cow Disease. The Journal of The Korean Public Health Association 2010; 36(2): 27-34.
  2. Burton M, Young T. The impact of BSE on the demand for beef and other meats in Great Britain. Applied Economics 1996; 28(6): 687-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/000368496328434
  3. Chang HS, Kinnucan H. Advertising, Information, and Product quality: The case of Butter. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1991; 73(4): 1195-1203. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242447
  4. Smith M, van Ravenswaay EO, Thompson SR. Sales Loss determination in food contamination incidents : An application to milk bans in Hawaii. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1988; 70(3): 513-20. https://doi.org/10.2307/1241489
  5. Verbeke W. Beliefs, attitude and behaviour towards fresh meat revisited after the Belgian dioxin crisis. Food Quality and Preference 2001; 12(8): 489-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(01)00042-8
  6. KBS-1TV. Consumer Reports' shock! Asbestos detected in baby powder. ' 2009. 4. 1.
  7. Yonhap News. FDA 'The case of Medications Containing Asbestos' the court gave for pharmaceutical hands for the first time in four years. 2013. 3. 26.
  8. Lee HW, Choi BY, Lee BK. Development of Pandemic Influenza Outbreak Communication Strategies. Korea Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, 2006.
  9. Hwang CS, Shim JY. H1N1 Influenza and Press. Korea Press Foundation, 2009.
  10. Park JE. The Influence of media communication on risk perception and behavior related to Mad Cow Disease : based on the data from mothers of elementary school students in Seoul. PhD Dissertation. Yonsei University, 2010.
  11. Hwang CS. Political situation and press of the candle by audience. Media insight, 2008. 9.
  12. Bennett P, Calman K. Risk Communication and Public Health. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
  13. Slovic P. Public Perception of Risk. Journal of Environmental Health 1997; 59(9): 22-5.
  14. Dosman DM, Adamowicz WL, Hrudey SE. Socioeconomic Determinants of Health- and Food-Related Risk Perceptions. Risk Analysis 2001; 21(2): 307-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.212113
  15. Miles S, Brennan M, Kuznesof S, et al., Public worry about specific food safety issues. British Food Journal 2004; 106(1): 9-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700410515172
  16. Tonsor GT, Schroeder TC, Pennnings JME. Factors Impacting Food Safety Risk Perceptions. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2009; 60(3): 625-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2009.00209.x
  17. Flynn J, Slovic P, Mertz CK. Gender, Race, and Perception of Environmental Health Risks. Risk Analysis 1994; 14(6): 1101-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00082.x
  18. Wilkes M. The public dissemination of medical research : Problems and solutions. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives 1997; 2(1): 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/108107397127888
  19. Yang SG, Yang SU. The Effect of Perceived Credibility of the News Media on Risk-Related Perceptions: Involvement in Risk as a Moderator of the Effect on Risk-Related Perceptions. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies 2003; 47(6): 279-305.
  20. Jung KH, Cho IH, Lee HY. A study on the effect of the media credibility and political attitude, political participation. Journal of Korean Political communication Association 2008; 9: 247-86.
  21. Aberbach JD, Walker JL. Political Trust and Racial Ideology. The American Political Science Review 1970; 64(4): 1199-1219. https://doi.org/10.2307/1958366
  22. Leiss W, Powell D. Mad Cows and Mother's Milk. 2nd ed. Quebec:McGill-Queen's University Press: 2004.
  23. Jung SY. Enhancing risk communication for promotion over safe use of medications. National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, 2010.