한국재난정보학회 논문집 (Journal of the Society of Disaster Information)

  • 제9권1호
  • /
  • Pages.113-122
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1976-2208(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-5287(eISSN)
한국재난정보학회 (The Korean Society of Disaster Information)
권호 표지

철도 보안검색시스템 도입에 관한 이용자의 인식 연구

A Research for the Opinion of Railway Users with the Introduction of Security Inspection System

  • Lee, Jangho (Department of Railroad Facility Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation) ;
  • Kim, Hun (Department of Railway Research, The Korea Transport Institute)
  • 발행 : 2013.03.31
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

우리나라는 철도이용객 증가에 따라 여러 다양한 철도안전 관련 제도 등을 마련하고 있으며, 이러한 차원에서 철도 보안검색시스템의 도입을 검토 중에 있다. 본 연구는 철도 보안검색시스템 도입에 앞서 이에 대한 충분한 대비를 위하여 외국의 철도보안검색제도 시행현황을 살펴보고, 국내 도입가능한 철도보안 검색방법 등을 제시하였다. 또한, 철도이용자들을 대상으로 하여 철도 보안검색 제도 시행과 관련한 설문조사결과를 바탕으로 철도 보안검색 제도에 대한 견해, 제도 시행 시 문제점, 개선방안 등을 파악하였다. 결론적으로 고속철도역에 대한 시범적 실시를 통해 점진적 시스템 도입이 필요하다고 제안하였다.

As the patronage of railroad increased, the government tried to introduce several the railroad safety program. The introduction of security inspection system in railroad is also considered with this background. In this paper, we examined the foreign cases in U.S., Spain, and China. Also, we surveyed the railroad users' opinion with the security inspection system and analyzed the results of survey for the sufficient preparation for it. Consequently, we suggested the introduction of high-speed rail station by way of showing an example.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. American Public Transportation Association (2010). Random Inspections of Carry-On Items in Transit Systems.
  2. Dimitris, P. (2009). Quantifying Individuals Trade-off between Privacy, Liberty and Security : The Case of Rail Travel in UK. The RAND Corporation.
  3. Federal Transit Administration (2006). Transit Agency Security and Emergency Management Protective Measures. U.S. Department of Transportation.
  4. Her, K.M. (2011). A Study on The Examination and Counterplan of The Terror in Rail Transportation. National Intelligence Service.
  5. Hanneke, D. (2007). "Security culture in the dutch and spanish railway sector: a historical perspective". Journal of Transport History. Vol.28. No. 2. pp.272-288. https://doi.org/10.7227/TJTH.28.2.8
  6. Korea Transport Institute (2013). A Study on the Introduction of Security Inspection System in Railway. Ministry of Land, Transport, and Maritime Affairs.
  7. Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) (2010). Explosives and Incendiaries Used in Terrorist Attacks on Public Surface Transportation: A Preliminary Empirical Examination.
  8. Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) (2007). Selective Screening of Rail Passengers.
  9. Ministry of Land, Transport, and Maritime Affairs (2011). Efficient Methodology for Public Safety in Railway.
  10. Rachel, W. (2010). Rail Passenger Security Screening. Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute.
  11. RAND Corporation (2007). Securing America's Passenger-Rail Systems.
  12. Shin, S.G. (2012). "A study on safety measures of railway terror in Korea : focused on cases of railway terror in Europe." Journal of Safety and Crisis Management, Vol. 8. No. 1. pp.140-154.
  13. Sivaramakrishnan, S. (2006). "Empirical analysis of the impact of security perception on intercity mode choice". Transportation Research Record No.1942. pp.9-15
  14. Transportation Research Board (2007). TCRP Report 86. Public Transportation Passenger Security Inspections: A Guide for Policy Decision Makers.
  15. U.S. Governmental Accountability Office (2010). Passenger Rail Security.
  16. U.S. Governmental Accountability Office (2010). Surface Transportation Security Priority Assessment.
  17. U.S. Governmental Accountability Office (2010). Technology Assessment Explosives Detection Technologies to Protect Passenger Rail.