An Influential Relationship between Urban Culture and Community Spirit

도시문화와 공동체 의식의 영향 관계

  • 김동윤 (안양대학교 스마트도시공간연구소)
  • Received : 2013.11.11
  • Accepted : 2013.11.26
  • Published : 2013.12.25

Abstract

With regard to urban culture this study aims to essential understanding and systematic approach to the culture. The "2012 Seoul Survey" report has been used to find out causality among the related variables. In the first place 'satisfaction of cultural condition' was operationally selected as a dependent variable for regression. For the purpose of controlling the third factors for ceteris paribus effect correlation analysis was previously done between the dependent variable and all other variables respectively, which resulted in two groups of variables: group (1) - 2 variables of very significant correlations(p-value<0.01) and (2) - the other 6 variables of significant correlations(p-value<0.05). Then hierarchical regression was adopted to these 2 groups to analyse statistical significance of independent variables, and multicollinearity(VIF; variance inflation factor). Additionally to OLS robust and bootstrapping regressions were done to confirm the validity of this model specification. At last a regression model specified by group (1) as independent variables(they are 'community spirit caring for women, the disabled, the poor and the old,' 'satisfaction of bicycle riding condition' shows that the variables have statistically significant and substantially strong effect on 'satisfaction of cultural condition.' This finding implies the following understanding; (1) urban festivals are regarded as the main of the urban culture as of now and this results from the low level of today's culture, (2) culture is telling and hearing stories but the influential relationship between urban culture and community spirit on the weak is negative, which says that the cultural perception among citizen is somewhat selfish and far from the essential understanding of the urban culture. In spite of restrictive external validity this finding can be used as a direction for promoting culture and a basis for related policy choice in cities.

Keywords

References

  1. 강형기. "향부론". 서울: 비봉출판사. 2001.
  2. 김동윤. "도시의 입지결정요인 추출에 관한 연구." "한국디지털건축.인테리어학회지" 11(2). pp. 51-60. 한국디지털건축.인테리어학회. 2011.
  3. 김동윤 a. "도시인의 문화환경 만족과 사회적 신뢰의 인과성." "한국디지털건축.인테리어학회지" 12(4). pp. 49-67. 한국디지털건축.인테리어학회. 2012.
  4. 김동윤 b. ""2011 서울서베이"를 이용한 '삶의 질' 관련 변수의 유의성 분석." "한국디지털건축.인테리어학회지" 12(3). pp. 39-47. 한국디지털건축.인테리어학회. 2012.
  5. 김동윤 c. "신도시 경쟁력 모형 설정에 관한 연구." "한국디지털건축.인테리어학회지" 12(2). pp. 39-51. 한국디지털건축.인테리어학회. 2012.
  6. 김창남. "대중문화의 이해". 파주: 한울아카데미. 2003. 서울시립대학교 도시인문학연구소. "도시적 삷과 도시문화". 서울: 메이데이. 2009.
  7. 서울특별시. "2012 서울서베이 보고서". 2013.
  8. 이군희. "사회과학연구방법론". 법문사. 2009.
  9. 임학순. "창의적 문화사회와 문화정책". 서울: 진한도서. 2003.
  10. 정기문. "문화산업의 논의와 전개." "문화정책논총". 제11권, pp.1-17. 1999.
  11. 하성규.김태섭. "한국도시재개발의 사회경제론". 서울: 박영사. pp. 129-150. 2003.
  12. Acock, A. C.. A Gentle Introduction to Stata. College Station, TX: A Stata Press. 2010.
  13. Mumford, L.. The Culture of Cities, NY: Harcourt, Brace and Company. 1938.
  14. Tylor, Edward B. Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art and Custom. Gloucester, Mass: Peter Smith. 1958.
  15. Wooldridge, J. M.. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. South-Western College Pub. 2008.
  16. Throsby, D.. "문화경제학". 성제환 역. 파주: 한울아카데미. 2004.