DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Response of Systemic Fungicides of Rhizoctonia spp. Causing Rhizoctonia Blight on Turfgrass

잔디에 Rhizoctonia 마름병을 유발하는 Rhizoctonia spp.의 침투성 살균제에 대한 반응

  • Chang, Taehyun (School of Ecology and Environmental System, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Seong Jun (School of Ecology and Environmental System, Kyungpook National University)
  • 장태현 (경북대학교 생태환경시스템학부 식물자원환경전공) ;
  • 이승준 (경북대학교 생태환경시스템학부 식물자원환경전공)
  • Received : 2013.11.26
  • Accepted : 2013.12.13
  • Published : 2013.12.31

Abstract

The Rhizoctonia blight causing by Rhizoctonia spp. is an important disease of turfgrass, requiring fungicide application to maintain acceptable conditions for turfgrass good qualities in the golf course. The experiment was conducted to determine the mean 50% effective concentration inhibiting mycelial growth ($EC_{50}$) value of to flutolanil, pyraclostrobine and hexaconazole to Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IB, Rhizoctonia cerealis and Rhizoctonia solani AG2-2IV isolated from Gyeongbuk province of Korea in vitro. Five discriminatory concentrations of each fungicide were used to detect in vitro sensitivity. The mean of $EC_{50}$ values to three systemic fungicides was the lowest isolate of R. solani AG-1 IB. However, the sensitivity of fungicides to Rhizoctonia solani AG2-2IV were higher mean $EC_{50}$ value of 0.026 ${\mu}g\;a.i.\;ml^{-1}$ of pyraclostrobine and 0.044 ${\mu}g\;a.i.\;ml^{-1}$ of flutolanil. R. cerealis was the lowest sensitivity to hexaconazole which was an average $EC_{50}$ value of 0.022 ${\mu}g\;a.i.\;ml^{-1}$. Inhibition of mycelial growth rate (%) by three combine fungicides using the $EC_{50}$ value of each fungicide was the highest R. solani AG2-2IV. Results of this study were may confirmed in vitro response fungicide of three Rhizoctonia species for control of Rhizoctonia blight in the field.

Rhizoctonia spp. 에 의한 Rhizoctonia 마름병은 잔디에서 중요한 병이며, 골프장에서 잔디의 좋은 품질을 유지하기 위하여 살균제를 사용하고 있다. 본시험은 포장에서 분리한 R. solani AG-1 IB, R. cerealis 및 R. solani AG2-2에 대한 침투성 살균제인 flutolanil, pyraclostrobine, and hexaconazole에 대하여 실내에서 상대적인 균사생장을 효과적으로 50%억제하는 $EC_{50}$농도를 결정하는 시험을 수행하였다. 각각 살균제에 대한 감수성은 3종의 Rhizoctonia균주에 대하여 5 수준의 농도를 사용하였다. 3종류의 살균제에 대한 $EC_{50}$ 값은 R. solani AG-1 IB에서 가장 낮았다. 하지만, R. solani AG2-2에 대한 살균제 감수성은 pyraclostrobine 과 flutolanil에서 평균 $EC_{50}$ 값이 0.026 ${\mu}g\;a.i.\;ml^{-1}$ 와 0.044 ${\mu}g\;a.i.\;ml^{-1}$ 로 가장 높았다. R. cerealis은 hexaconazole에서 $EC_{50}$ 값이 0.022 ${\mu}g\;a.i.\;ml^{-1}$로 가장 감수성이 낮았다. 각각의 살균제의 $EC_{50}$값을 사용하여 두 농약을 혼용한 3종의 조합에서 3종의 병원균에 대한 균사 생장억제율은 R. solani AG2-2에서 가장 높았다. 본 연구결과는 포장에서 Rhizoctonia 마름병을 방제하기 위하여 실내에서 침투성 살균제에 대한 반응을 확인할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Brent, K.J. 1995. Fungicide resistance in crop pathogens: how can it be managed. FRAC Monograph 1: 1-48.
  2. Chang, T.H. and Lee, S.J. 2012. Evaluation of fungicides for control of gray snow mold caused by Typhula incarnata on cool season turfgrass. Asian J. Turfgrass Sci. 6(2):102-109. (In Korean)
  3. Chang, T.H. and Lee, Y.S. 2013.Occurrence of brown patch on Kentucky bluegrass caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IB. Weed Turf. Sci. 2(1):88-94. (In Korean) https://doi.org/10.5660/WTS.2013.2.1.088
  4. Couch, H.B. 1985. Common names for turfgrass diseases. In:Common for plant disease (Eds). By Hansen, J.D. Plant Dis. 69:649-676. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-69-649
  5. Couch, H.B., Lucas, L.T. and Haygood, R.A. 1990. The nature and control of Rhizoctonia blight. Golf Course Manag. 58:49-58.
  6. Cole, H., Taylor, B. and Duich, J. 1968. Evidence of differing tolerances to fungicides among isolates of Sclerotinia homoeocarpa. Phytopathology 58:683-686.
  7. Detweiler, A.R., Vargas, J.M., Jr. and Danneberger,T.K. 1983. Resistance of Sclerotinia homoeocarpa to iprodione and benomyl. Plant Dis. 67:627-630. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-67-627
  8. Fungicide list in Korea. 2013. http://www.koreacpa.org (Accessed on Nov. 10, 2013).
  9. Golembiewski, R.C., Vargas, J.M., Jones, A.L. and Detweiler, A.R. 1995. Detection of demethylation inhibitor (DMI) resistance in Sclerotinia homoeocarpa populations. Plant Dis. 79:491-493. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-79-0491
  10. Hsiang, T., Yang, L. and Barton, W. 1997. Baseline sensitivity and cross-resistance to demethylation-inhibiting fungicides in Ontario isolates of Sclerotinia homoeocarpa. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 103:409-416. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008671321231
  11. Jo, Y-K., Niver, A.L., Rimelspach, J.W. and Boehm, M.J. 2006. Fungicide sensitivity of Sclerotinia homoeocarpa from golf courses in Ohio. Plant Dis. 90:807-813. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-90-0807
  12. Kim, W.G., Shim, G.Y., Cho, W.D. and Lee, Y.H. 1991. Anastomosis groups and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia solani isolates causing Rhizoctonia blight of turfgass. Koean J. Plant Pathol. 7:257-259.
  13. Putman, A.I., Jung, G. and Kaminski, J.E. 2010. Geographic distribution of fungicide-insensitive Sclerotinia homoeocarpa isolates from golf courses in the northeastern United States. Plant Dis. 94:186-195 https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-94-2-0186
  14. Smith, J.D., Jackson, N. and Woolhouse, A.R. 1989. Fungal diseases of amenity turfgrasses. E. & F. N. Spon, New York, USA. pp. 75-89.
  15. SAS Institute, Inc. 2003. SAS/STAT user's guide: Statistics. Version 8.00, SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
  16. Vargas, J.M., Jr., Golembiewski, R. and Detweiler, A.R. 1992. Dollar spot resistance to DMI fungicides. Golf Course Manage. 60(3):50-54.

Cited by

  1. Occurrence of Brown Blight Caused byWaitea circinatavar.zeaeon Cool Season Turfgrass in Korea vol.44, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5941/MYCO.2016.44.4.330
  2. on turfgrass fungal diseases vol.60, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3839/jabc.2017.034