대한토목학회논문집 (KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research)

  • 제33권1호
  • /
  • Pages.337-346
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1015-6348(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2799-9629(eISSN)
대한토목학회 (Korean Society of Civil Engeneers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Design Structure Matrix를 활용한 플랜트 설계의 최적 협업 체계에 관한 연구

A Study on an Optimal Plant Design Collaboration System Using a Design Structure Matrix

  • 윤종이 (삼성물산 건설부문, 한양대학교 공학대학원 건설관리학) ;
  • 김정환 (한양대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 강상혁 (한국건설산업연구원) ;
  • 서종원 (한양대학교 건설환경공학과)
  • 투고 : 2012.01.31
  • 심사 : 2012.10.29
  • 발행 : 2013.02.04
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

플랜트 설계는 매우 다양한 공학 분야가 참여하는 고도로 복잡한 시스템이다. 이 방대한 시스템에 관여된 각 서브시스템은 각기 다른 서브시스템과 수시로 정보를 주고 받으며 작업을 반복하게 되는 복잡한 관계를 형성한다. 이런 복잡한 프로세스에서 체계적인 설계관리는 성공적인 플랜트 설계를 위한 필수적인 요건이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 Design Structure Matrix를 이용하여 플랜트의 최적 설계 협업 체계를 도출하였다. 이를 위해 전문가 설문 및 워크샵을 수행하여 플랜트 설계의 주요 업무, 설계 서브시스템, 설계요소, 관련설계요소, 그리고 그들간의 관계를 파악하였다. 효율적인 분석을 위해 Visual Basic Application과 Matlab을 이용하여 자동화된 분석 프로그램을 개발하였다. 제안된 방법과 프로그램을 소각로 설계 시스템에 적용한 결과 유효한 주요 반복작업 그룹들을 도출할 수 있었다. 도출된 결과물은 설계 협업 전략 수립에 유용하게 활용될 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

A design collaboration system for a plant project is a set of complicated multidisciplinary processes in which a large number of various engineering fields are involved. Each subsystem is related to each other as they depend on information that other subsystems create, which leads to inefficient design iterations. This study presents an optimal design collaboration system for a plant project using Design Structure Matrix (DSM). Data regarding design subsystems, parameters, etc. were obtained by expert surveys and workshops. An automatic analysis program for DSM was developed using Visual Basic Application and Matlab to provide a partitioned DSM. A case study was conducted on a furnace project; consequently, the optimal design collaboration system with five crucial iteration groups was derived.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Austin, S., Baldwin, A., Li, B., and Waskett P. (2000) Analytical design planning technique (ADePT): a dependency structure matrix tool to schedule the building design process, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 18, Issue 2. pp. 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461900370807
  2. Chen, C.H., Ling, S.F., and Chen, W. (2003) Project scheduling for collaborative product development using DSM, International journal of project management, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 291-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00023-6
  3. Daniel H.L., Troy A.D., Joel J.D., and Francis L. de los Reyes III (2001) System-Wide Optimization of Wastewater Treatment Plants Using Genetic Algorithms, Proceedings of the 2001 World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, held in Orlando, Florida, May 20-24.
  4. Fayez, M., Axelsson, P., Oloufa, A.A., and Hosni, Y. (2003) DSM vs CPM: Issues for planning design & construction activities, ASCE, Proceedings of Construction Research Congress 2003, New York, pp. 1-8.
  5. Gebala, D. A., and Eppinger, S. D. (1991) Methods for analyzing design procedures, the Proceedings of 3rd International ASME Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Sep. 22-25, 1991, Miami, FL., pp. 227-233.
  6. Gu, B. H., Kim, T. H. (2007) Application System Improvement of the Codes and Standards for Plant Design, Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 8, No 2, pp. 81-89.
  7. Jang, S., Park, M., Lee, H. (2007) A Study on Schedule Management in Construction Project Using the Dependency Structure Matrix, Proceeding of Korean Institute of Construction Engineering and Management, pp. 682-686.
  8. Kim, C. M., Park, Y. W. (2008) PBS Construction by Using DSM, Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, Vol. 11, No.1, pp. 26-32.
  9. Lee, S., Son, J., You, Y., Han, C., Development of Engineering Checklist Model for Case-based Evaluation of Plant EPC Project, Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 146-152.
  10. Park G. S. (2004) A study on development strategy for plant industry to achieve the amount of order of 30 billion dollar, Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade.
  11. Park, M., Ham, Y., Lee, H., Kim, W., (2010) Development of Design Process Management Model using Dependency Structure Matrix for Constructability, Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 65-74. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2010.11.5.65
  12. Mhaisalkar V., Bassin J., Paramasivam R., and Khanna P. (1993) Dynamic Programming Optimization of Water‐Treatment‐Plant Design, J. Environ. Eng., Vol. 119, No. 6, pp. 1158-1175. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1993)119:6(1158)
  13. Lindemann U. Maurer U., Braun, T. (2009) Structural Complexity Management, Berlin, Springer, 2009.
  14. Son, J., Lee, S., Han, C., Kim, J., (2007) A Study on the Critical Success Factors for Engineering Step on Plant Project, Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 227-234.
  15. Warfield J. N. (1973) Binary matrices in system modeling, IEEE Transactions on Systems, MAn, and Cybernetics, Vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 441-449. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309270
  16. Yassine, A. A., Falkenburg, D., Chelst, K. (1999) Engineering design management: an information structure approach, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 37, No. 13, pp. 2957-2975. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075499190374

피인용 문헌

  1. A Study on Improvement Plan of BIM-based Design Process using DSM -Focus on the Criteria Design Phase- vol.19, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7315/CADCAM.2014.368
  2. Assessment of FEED Structure and Functions for Project Management of Thermal Power Plant Construction vol.16, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2015.16.5.065