한국조경학회지 (Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture)

  • 제41권6호
  • /
  • Pages.171-184
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1225-1755(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-9566(eISSN)
한국조경학회 (The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

지역주민 태도에 의한 수변공간 개발 형태 분석 - 여주시를 중심으로 -

An Analysis of Waterfront Development Type based on Residents' Attitudes - Focused on Yeoju-Si -

  • 유수진 (고려대학교 대학원 환경생태공학과) ;
  • 석영선 (고려대학교 대학원 환경생태공학과) ;
  • 최윤의 (고려대학교 대학원 환경생태공학과) ;
  • 전진형 (고려대학교 환경생태공학부)
  • You, Soo-Jin (Dept. of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Seok, Young-Sun (Dept. of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Choi, Yun Eui (Dept. of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Chon, Jinhyung (Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University)
  • 투고 : 2013.11.13
  • 심사 : 2013.12.22
  • 발행 : 2013.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

최근 몇 년간 수변공간 개발에 대한 관심이 증가하면서 지속가능한 지역균형 발전을 목표로 하는 지역개발 정책 및 사업이 증가하였다. 이러한 과정에서 생활환경 변화에 대한 지역문제가 발생하게 되었고, 지역주민태도를 반영한 개발계획의 중요성이 부각되었다. 본 연구에서는 새로 조성된 수변공간에 대하여 허용 가능한 개발형태 분석 및 향후 개발목표를 설정하기 위해, 사회교환이론을 바탕으로 지역주민 태도를 고려하여 LAC 시스템의 첫 번째 단계에 대한 분석을 실시하였다. 이를 위해 여주시 지역주민 240명을 대상으로 수변공간 개발에 대한 주민태도, 허용 가능한 수변공간 개발형태, 주민특성을 설문하였다. 설문한 데이터에 대한 기술통계분석, 요인분석을 실시한 뒤, 수변공간 개발에 대한 주민태도에 따른 허용 가능한 개발 형태를 알아보기 위해 다중회귀분석을 실시하였다. 다음으로 거주특성과 수변공간 개발에 대한 주민태도와의 차이를 알아보기 위해 기술통계분석, 요인분석, T-test, 일원분산분석(one-way ANOVA)를 실시하였다. 그 결과, 여주시 지역주민들이 허용하는 수변공간 개발 형태는 자연교육중심 개발 형태라는 것을 확인할 수 있었으며, 거주지역에 따라 수변공간 개발에 대한 형태에 차이가 나타나는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 본 연구의 결과를 통해 수변공간의 개발 및 관리 목적을 설정하고, LAC 후속단계인 휴양자원 등급화의 적용범위에 대한 기준을 마련할 수 있었다.

The importance for local development, which residents' attitudes have reflected, is well known. Therefore, in order to formulate an approach for sustainable development, a study on sustainable waterfront development has become necessary. This study performed the first step analysis of Limits of Acceptable Change(LAC) System that considers the local residential attitude to make the analysis and standard for acceptable development type in the waterfront. This study used the characteristics of the residents, the social exchange theory, and the LAC System. This was done because it is useful to ensure that basic data can be used for the establishment of management objectives. Yeoju-Si was selected as the site for the investigation. A total of 240 surveys were obtained. Analyses were conducted to 1) determine the relationships between the residents' attitudes toward the waterfront development type and the acceptable development type and 2) to examine relationships between the residents' characteristics and the residents' attitudes toward the waterfront development. The results of this study are as follows: The development pertaining to the parameter 'nature education' arguably has the potential to generate substantial revenues for Yeoju-Si and could link the local development and conservation. This study concludes that the area of residence were closely correlated with the residents' attitudes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, B. Y., B. K. Lee and C. S. Shafer(2002) Operationalizing sustainability in regional tourism planning: An application of the limits of acceptable change framework. Tourism Management 23(1): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00059-0
  2. Ajzen, L.(1988) Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Chicago: The Dorsey Press.
  3. Allen, L. R., H. R. Hafer, P. T. Lon and R. R. Perdue(1993) Rural residents' attitudes toward recreation and tourism development. Journal of Travel Research 31(4): 27-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759303100405
  4. Andereck, K. L. and C. A. Vogt(2000) The relationship residents' attitudes toward tourism and tourism development options. Journal of Travel Research 39(1): 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728750003900104
  5. Ap, J.(1992) Residents' perceptions on tourism impacts. Annals of Tourism Research 19(4): 665-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(92)90060-3
  6. Baek, S. M. and E. I. Noh(2006) Development of Waterfront as Leisure Space. Seoul: Seoul Development Institute.
  7. Belisle, F. J. and D. R. Hoy(1992) The perceived impact of tourism by residents a case study in Santa Marta, Colombia. Annals of Tourism Research 7: 83-101.
  8. Cho, B. H., Y. H. Choi and D. H. Kim(2005) Residents perception differences on tourism impacts. Journal of the Korean Association of Regional Geographers 11(5): 426-439.
  9. Cho, K. I. and N. J. Kim(2002) Structural equation analysis of resident attitudes to tourism development. Journal of Tourism Sciences 26(2): 31-51.
  10. Cho, S. W. and D. H. Song(2012) Application of the planning factors on urban waterfront for composition of the landscape characteristics - With special emphasis on the urban waterfront development of the domestic and overseas cases. Journal of The Urban Design Institute of Korea 13(6): 103-117.
  11. Choi, S. M. and N. J. Kim(2005) Attitudes of tourism-involved civil servants towards tourism development. Journal of Tourism Sciences 29(1): 209-227.
  12. Choi, Y. G.(2000) Concept and project for sustainable tourism. Planning and Policy 223: 6-19.
  13. Choi, Y. H. and H, Lee(2006) Perceptions and cluster characteristics of residents based on distance effects and social representation theory: Public show-caves. Journal of Tourism Sciences 30(2): 161-180.
  14. Diedrich, A., P. B. Huguet and J. T. Subirana(2011) Methodology for applying the limits of acceptable change process to the management of recreational boating in the Balearic Islands, Spain(Western Mediterranean). Ocean and Coastal Management 54(4): 341-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.12.009
  15. Frissel, S. S. and G. H. Stankey(1972)Wilderness environmental quality: Search for social and ecological harmony. Proceeding of the Society of American Foresters Annual Conference, Washington, D.C..
  16. Huh, H. J., Y. H. Hyun and S. C. Huh(2005) The structural equation modeling approach to the relationships between the residents' attitude towards participation, status of local economy, and the type of tourism development based on social exchange theory. Journal of Tourism Sciences 29(3): 229-250.
  17. Jang, J. H.(2012) A study on differences of residents' attitudes toward tourism development impacts - Focused on nearby residents and faroff residents. Journal of Tourism Sciences 27(3): 337-355.
  18. Jang, S. H., J. Y. Yoon, S. D. Kim and Y. N. Yoon(2007) An establishment of operation and management system for flood control and conservation in reservoir with gate : II. Establishment of efficient reservoir management and operation system. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers 27(2): 141-150.
  19. Jeong, J. E., D. W. Ko and J. T. Yeo(2007) An application of the limits of acceptable change for sustainable regional tourism development based upon residents' attitudes by recreation opportunity spectrum. Journal of Tourism Sciences 31(3): 289-310.
  20. Jeong, J. U.(2005) The Model of Sustainable Tourism Development by Regional ROS Characteries. Ph. D. Dissertation. Kyonggi University, Suwon.
  21. Kaltenborn, B. P., O. Andersen, C. Nellemann, T. Bjerke and C. Thrane (2008) Resident attitudes towards mountain second-home tourism development in Norway: The effects of environmental attitudes. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 16(6): 664-680. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580802159685
  22. Kang, S. K.(2002) Residents attitudes toward tourism development - Case study from Andong Hahoe Village -. Journal of Korean Association For Cultural Economics 5(1): 139-158.
  23. Kim, D. W.(2009) A Study of Plans to Make Livable Communities by Improving Space Quality : With Local Residents and Users. Master Dissertation. Seoul National University, Seoul.
  24. Kim, E. K.(2004) Residents' perceptions toward tourism development : The case of Jungmun and Sungsanpo tourist complex. Journal of Foodservice Management 7(1): 123-138.
  25. Kim, H. C., H. W. Lee and K. H. Ahn(2013) Planning characteristics and spatial strategies of abroad waterfront developments by scale types of regional, urban, and local levels - Focusing on clyde waterfront, Hafen city, Battery park city -. Journal of Korean Institute of Urban Design 14(2): 81-98.
  26. Kim, J. S.(2003) Evaluation of wetland as application on limits of acceptable change : LAC, recreation opportunity spectrum : ROS methods. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 31(4): 57-66.
  27. Kim, K. S.(2007) Legal aspects of reshaping Seoul metropolitan land planning - Land planning and globalization. Public Land Law Review 37(2): 22-49.
  28. Kim, K. S.(2011) An approach of design development method for urban waterfront space of leisure culture infrastructure. Journal of Digital Design 11(3): 121-129.
  29. Ko, D. W. and J. E. Jeong(2007) The differences of attitudes toward tourism development by regional ROS characteristics as a approaches methodology of LAC for sustainable regional tourism development. Tourism Study 22(1): 529-548.
  30. Kwon, Y. S. and M. S. Cho(2010) A study on the urban planning and design principles on Riverfront. Report to Architecture Urban Research Institute.
  31. Kwon, Y. S. and M. S. Cho(2011) The character of urban design around the riverfront area in Korea - Focused on the composition of public space and land use pattern. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning and Design 27(9): 251-260.
  32. Latkova, P. and C. A. Vogt(2012) Residents' attitudes toward existing and future tourism development in rural communities. Journal of Travel Research 51(1): 50-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287510394193
  33. Lee, B. H.(2009) Utilization of water-friendly space for rural-urban exchange and rural tourism. Korea Irrigation and Drainage 11(2): 199-205.
  34. Lee, D. G., G. J. Bang, I. S. Kim, S. W. Yun, H. G. Kang and J. Y. Kim(1999) The foundation research development of anmyundo based on a consciousness of resident and visitor. The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 2(4): 35-46.
  35. Lee, H. J.(2004) Study on the Rural People's Attitude toward Leisure : Focused on Incheon Metropolitan City. Master Dissertation. Incheon National University, Incheon.
  36. Lee, H. K., H. W. Jun and J. A. Kim(2012) Socio-economic and environmental effects of waterfront development on the civic resistance : Centering around inhabitants alongside the Nakdong river. Journal of Tourism Sciences 27(2): 435-454.
  37. Lee, S. J. and S. H. Heo(2012) Strategies for river-based leisure in Gyeonggi-do. Research Report to Gyeonggi Research Institute.
  38. Lim, S. B.(1998) Landscape Urbanism. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.
  39. Lime, D. W.(1970) Research for determining use capacities of the boundary waters canoe area, naturalist. Journal of Travel Research 21(4): 8-13.
  40. Madrigal, R.(1993) A tale of tourism in two cities. Annals of Tourism Research 20(2): 336-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(93)90059-C
  41. Mansfeld, Y.(1992) Group-differentiated perceptions of social impacts related to tourism development. Professional Geographer 44: 377-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1992.00377.x
  42. Mbaiwa, J. E. and A. L. Stronza(2011) Changes in resident attitudes towards tourism development and conservation in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Journal of Environmental Management 92(8): 1950-1959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.009
  43. McCool, S. F.(1994) Planning for sustainable nature dependent tourism development: The limits of acceptable change system. TourismRecreation Research 19(2): 51-55.
  44. Ministry of Culture Sports and Tourism(2011) Waterfront cultural tourism development plan. Research Report to Ministry of Culture Sports and Tourism.
  45. Ministry of Land(2007) Present Status of Ecological Space in Waterfronts.
  46. Oh, J. H. and Y. S. Yoon(2009) Impact of place attachment, priority, evaluation, satisfaction toward tourism development and demographic attributes of residents on support, cognition of effectiveness of tourism development - The case of Kangwon province -. Tourism Study 24(5): 275-295.
  47. Oh, S. H.(2010) A Study on the Planning Method for Typology of River Amenity Improvement. Master Dissertation. Kyungwon University, Seongnam.
  48. Oh, S. H., E. J. Oh and C. Jung(2012) Development of impact management model for small islands tourists. -Apply SIEOS Udo of Jeju-. Proceeding of The 71th TOSOK International Tourism Conference. Seoul: The tourism Sciences Society of Korea. pp. 1201-1218.
  49. Park, C. K. and H. Y. Kim(2011) The influence on residents' recognition and attitude on their farm village development in a comprehensive rural village development project. Journal of The Economic Geographical Society of Korea 14(3): 419-436. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2011.14.3.419
  50. Perdue, R. R., P. T. Long and Y. S. Kang(1995) Resident support for gambling as a tourism development strategy. Journal of Travel Research 34(2): 3-11.
  51. Rural Development Administration(2012) Waterfront Design Guidelines in Rural Communities. Suwon: Rural Development Administration, National Academy of Agricultural Science.
  52. Saveriades, A.(2000) Establishing the social tourism carrying capacity for the tourist resorts of the east coast of the republic of cyprus. Tourism Management 21(2): 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(99)00044-8
  53. Sheldon, P. J. and T. Abenoja(2001) Residents attitudes in a mature destination -The case of Wikiki-. Tourism Management 22: 435-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00009-7
  54. Shim, W. K. and K. J. Baek(2000) Development of the close - to - nature construction technology for the low - flow revetment of the stream - A case of Jungpyung stream in Yongin City -. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 28(1): 83-91.
  55. Shin, S. H. and H. J. Yoon(2011) Research paper : Re-visitation choice impacts of consideration on sustainable tourism development -Using logit and probit models-. Korean Society of Rural Planning 17(1): 59-65. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2011.17.1.059
  56. Song, K. I., J. J. Kim and Y. J. Kim(2010) Study on factors influencing leisure & tourism space and attitude of local community. Tourism Study 24(6): 473-493.
  57. Stankey, G. H., D. N. Cole, R. C. Lucas, M. E. Petersen and S. S. Frissell(1985) The Limits of Acceptable Change(LAC) Systemfor Wilderness Planning. United States: Department of Agriculture Forest Service.
  58. Teye, V., S. F. Sönmez and E. Sirakaya(2002) Residents' attitudes toward tourism development. Annals of Tourism Research 29(3): 668-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(01)00074-3
  59. Vargas-Sanchez, A., N. Porras-Bueno and M. D. L. A. Plaza-Mejia (2011) Explaining residents' attitudes to tourism: Is a universal model possible? Annals of Tourism Research 38(2): 460-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2010.10.004
  60. Yeoju-Gun(2007) 2020 Yeoju Master Plan. Research Report to Yeoju- Gun.
  61. Yeoju-Gun(2011) Social Statistics Survey in Yeoju-gun. Research Report to Yeoju-Gun.
  62. Yoo, K. J., B. H. Han, J. W. Choi and J. Y. Heo(2012) A study on community member perception due to impacts on development of the Dulegil in Bukhansan National Park. The Korea Society of Environment and Ecology 26(1): 113-124.
  63. Zamani-Farahani, H. and G. Musa(2008) Residents' attitudes and perception towards tourism development: A case study of Masooleh, Iran. Tourism Management 29(6): 1233-1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.02.008
  64. 畔柳昭雄 and 渡邊秀俊(1999) 都市の水邊と人間行動: 都市生態學的視 点による親水行動論. Kim, N. Y. and H. S. Lee(translation) Urban Waterfronts and Human Behavior. Seoul: Sunin, 2011.