DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance Estimation of SBR Aerobic Digestion Combined with Ultrasonication by Numerical Experiment

수치실험을 통한 초음파 결합형 SBR 호기성 소화의 거동 예측

  • Received : 2013.11.21
  • Accepted : 2013.12.13
  • Published : 2013.12.15

Abstract

Using a developed mathematical model and calibrated kinetic constants, numerical experiments for a aerobic digestion of wastewater sludge by SBR aerobic digestion process combined with ultrasonication (USSBR) were performed in this study. It simulated well the phenomena of the decomposition of particulate organics and the release of organic nitrogen and transformation. To achieve 40 % of particulate organics removal, USSBR process requires only 6 days of SRT and 14 W/L of ultrasonic power whereas SBR aerobic digestion process requires 12 days of SRT. Based on the model simulation results, an empirical equation was presented here. This equation will be used to predict digestion efficiency for the given variables of SRT and ultrasonic power dose. USSBR aerobic digestion process can reduce the nitrogen concentration. The optimal operation strategy for the simultaneous removal of solids and soluble nitrogen in this process is estimated to 7 days of SRT with 14 W/L of ultrasonic power dose while anoxic period was 6 hours out of 24 hours of cycle time. In this condition, 40 % of particulate organics as well as 36 % of total nitrogen will be removed and the soluble nitrogen concentration of the centrate will be lower less then 40 mg/L.

Keywords

References

  1. Bougrier C., Albasi C., Delgenes J.P. and Carrere H. (2006) Effect of ultrasonic, thermal and ozone pre-treatments on waste activated sludge solubilisation and anaerobic biodegradability, Chemical Engineering and Processing, 45, pp.711-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2006.02.005
  2. Chang T.C., You S.J., Damodar R.A. and Chen Y.Y. (2011) Ultrasound pre-treatment step for performance enhancement in an aerobic sludge digestion process, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 42, pp.801-808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2011.01.003
  3. Henze M., Gujer W., Mino T. and Loosdrecht M. (2007) Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3 - Ed. by IWA task group on mathematical modelling for design and operation of biological wastewater treatment, IWA publishing, UK.
  4. Jin Y. Huan L., Mahar R.B., Wang Z. and Nie Y. (2010) Combined alkaline and ultrasonic pretreatment of sludge before aerobic digestion, J. Environ. Sciences, 21, pp.279-284.
  5. Kim S. H., Lee I.H., Yun J.W. and Lee D.W. (2013) Numerical model for SBR aerobic digestion combined with ultrasonication and parameter calibration, Journal of Korean Society of Water and Wastewater, 27(4), pp.457-468. https://doi.org/10.11001/jksww.2013.27.4.457
  6. Kim S. H., Lee D.W. and Kim D.H. (2012) Performance evaluation of hybrid SBR aerobic digestion combined with ultrasonication by using a mathematical model, Journal of Korean Society of Water and Wastewater, 26(6), pp.897-905. https://doi.org/10.11001/jksww.2012.26.6.897
  7. MetCalf and Eddy (2004) Wastewater engineering - Treatment and reuse, McGrawHill.
  8. Ministry of Environment (2012) 2009 statistical yearbook, Ministry of Environment of Korea.
  9. Yan Y. , Feng L., Zhang C., Wisniewski C. and Zhou Q. (2010) Ultrasonic enhancement of waste activated sludge hydrolysis and volatile fatty acids accumulation at pH 10.0, Water Research, 44, pp.3329-3336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.03.015