DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Relationships Between Class Size and Middle School Students' Perceptions of School Lives

중학생의 학급규모에 대한 인식과 학교생활간의 관계에 관한 실증적 연구

  • Received : 2013.10.07
  • Accepted : 2013.11.20
  • Published : 2013.11.30

Abstract

This study investigated middle school students' perceptions of an optimum class size as well as the relationships between a class size and various aspects of students' lives at school. Data were gathered from 858 students from 8 classes (grade 1 and 2) at 4 middle schools located in Busan by administering survey questionnaires. The average class sizes to which each participating students belonged were 17.88, 30.0, 31.88, 28.0 respectively. A series of comparative analyses were carried out, revealing that the majority of the participating students perceived 25-30 as an optimum size for one class. Also, students in a relatively smaller class tended to show higher levels of satisfaction with school lives and with school and classroom facilities, more positive attitudes towards classroom atmosphere, and greater needs for peer interaction than did their counterparts. Furthermore, it was found out that the actual class size had to do with the students' perceptions of the relationships between school facilities and their levels of stress and pleasure at school. These findings were discussed in order to provide educators, architects, and policy makers with practical implications for bringing about a better school environment that is conducive to learning and living for middle school students.

Keywords

References

  1. Blatchford, P., Edmonds, S., & Martin, C. Class size, pupil attentiveness and peer relations. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73. pp.15-36. 2003 https://doi.org/10.1348/000709903762869897
  2. Blatchford, P., & Mortimore, P. The issue of class size for young children in schools: What can we learn from research? Oxford Review of Education, 20(4). pp.441-428. 1994 https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498940200404
  3. Coleman, J. S. Equality of educational opportunities. Washington. DC: US Government Printing Office. 1996
  4. Finn, J. D., & Achilles, C. M. Answers and questions about class size: a statewide experiment. American Educational Research Journal, 27(3). pp.557-577. 1990 https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312027003557
  5. Finn, J. D. Class Size and Students at Risk: What is know? What is next? Washington, DC: Department of Education. Educational Research and Improvement, National Institute on the Education. 1998
  6. Finn, J. D., & Achilles, C. M. Tennessee's class size study: Findings, implications, misconceptions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, pp.97-109. 1999 https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737021002097
  7. Finn, J. D., Pannozzo, G. M., & Achilles, C. M. The "Why" of Class Size: Student Behavior in Small Classes. Review of Educational Research, 73(3). pp.321-368. 2003 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543073003321
  8. Glass, G. V., & Smith, M. L. Meta-analysis of research on the relationship of class size and achievement. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development. Sep, 1978
  9. Hong, Hu-jo, The effect of class size reducing for curriculum operation, Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development, 2003
  10. Horne, K. M. Optimum class size for intensive instruction. Harvard Educational Review, 50(2), pp.189-193. 1980
  11. Japan National Institute for Educational Policy Research, Research on Class size. 2000. 03
  12. Japan National Institute for Educational Policy Research, Study on the efficacy of reducing class size, learninggroup size, and the pupil-teacher ratio. 2013,03
  13. Kim, Young-chul, Park, Young-suk, Park, Hyo-jung, & Han, You-kyung, The educational effects of class size in Korea, Korea Development Institute. 2001
  14. Kim, Sang-hee, A study on the impact of over-sized schools and over-crowded classes on the effectiveness of elementary education, Major in Educational Administration, Korea National University of Education .2002.03
  15. Kong, Eun-bae, Han, Mann-gil, & Lee, Hye-younng, Optimum size of school and class, Korea Educational Development Institute. 1984
  16. Konstantopoulos, S. How consistent are class size effects?. Evaluation Review, 35(1). pp.71-92. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X11399847
  17. Kwon, Ki-uk, A study on eduction strategies of the class size for improvement of education quality in schools, The Journal of Educational Administration, 20(2). pp.1-24. 2002
  18. Merriam, S. B. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. SanFrancisco: John Wiley and Sons. 2009
  19. Office for Standards in Education. Class size and the quality of education. A report from Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Schools. 1995
  20. Paik, Sung-joon, Hwang, In-sung, Policy alternatives to realize the optimum size of school and class, Korea Educational Development Institute, 1997
  21. Plowden Report, Children and their primary school: A report of the Central Advisory Council for Education. Her Majesty's Stationery Office. 1967
  22. Rittelmeyer, C. Schulbauten positiv gestalten:Wie Schuler Farben und Formen erleben, 2005
  23. Shapson, S. M., Wright, E. N., Sason, G., & Fitzgerlan, J. An experimental study of the effects of class size. American Education Research Journal, 17(2), pp.141-152. 1980 https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312017002141
  24. Shin, Na-min, A case study on the efficacy and methods of user participatory design in the refurbishment od school spaces, Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4), pp.171-189, 2010 https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.26.4.171
  25. Smith, P. K,, & Connolly, K. J. The ecology of preschool behavior. NY: Cambridge university press. 1980
  26. Stecher, B., Bohrnstedt, G., Kirst, M., McRobbi, J., & Williams, T. Class size reduction in California: A story of Hope, promise, and unintended consequence, Phi Delta Kappan, 82(9), pp.670-674. May, 2002.
  27. The School survey for reducing number of students, The Ministry of Education report, Apr.22. 2013
  28. Word, Elizabeth, et al. Project star: Final executive summary report, kindergarten through third grade (1985-1989). Nashville: Tennessee State Department of Education. 1990
  29. Yanagi Haruo, History of the Class, Kodansha Ltd. 2011