디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제11권11호
  • /
  • Pages.733-745
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

인본주의에 기초한 평등성과 수월성이 균형잡힌 교육정책 방안

Educational policy plan balanced with excellence and equality based on humanism

  • Cho, Si-O (Dep. of Education, Wonkwang University) ;
  • An, Kwan-Su (Dep. of Education, Wonkwang University)
  • 투고 : 2013.09.24
  • 심사 : 2013.11.20
  • 발행 : 2013.11.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 군사정권 이후의 문민정부, 국민의 정부, 참여정부, 실용정부의 교육정책을 돌아보고, 역대 정부의 일관된 교육혁신정책인 교육의 신자유주의적 속성과 그에 따라 파생하는 교육정책상의 문제점들을 살펴보고자 한다. 이를 바탕으로 현 정부에 요구되는 국가의 교육정책이 나아갈 방향을 제시하고자 한다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 미래교육의 패러다임으로서 '인본주의 교육논리'를 제시하고 있다. 이는 기존의 수월성과 평등성이 분리된 교육정책이 아닌 양자가 조화롭게 균형을 이루는 인본주의(人本主義) 위주의 교육정책을 의미한다.

This article aims to look into the education policy of the civilian government, the practical government, the participatory government and the government of the people after the military government, and then to investigate characteristics and problems to neo-liberalism, which was an common education innovation policy of past government. This study tries to suggest a far-sighted national policy of education the present government should orient. Futhermore, the article presents 'humanistic philosophy of education' as a new paradigm of a future education. This means balanced humanistic education policy, not disintegrated education in which excellence and equality take different paths.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Nae Hee Kang, Neoliberal Education Policy under the Roh Moon-Hyun Government, Education Review, Vol.- No.14, 11-27, 2003.
  2. Tae-Joong Gahng, A critique of the Neo-Liberalistic Conception of Higher Education Reform in Korea, Korean Education Inquiry, Chung-Ang University, Vol.19, 41-57, 2004.
  3. Kyung Hwa Ko, A Study on the Education for the equality and excellence, Theory and Practice of Education, 12(2), 1-22, 2007.
  4. Yo-Han Ko, Excellence and Equity in Education, Seoul: Hakminsa, 1989.
  5. Education Reform Commission, Education reform plan for the new education system established. 1995.
  6. Gyeong-Geun Kim, Excellence and equity in secondary education, Korea Institute of Education, Autumn a Conference Papers, 25-52, 2005.
  7. Yong-Chan kim, A study on the Improvement Scheme of Human Rights Education for Democratic Citizenship Education, Gyeongin National University of Education, Education a collection of treatises, 24, 141-154, 2004.
  8. http://www.pressian.com/article/article.asp?article_num=40081210114513§ion=03
  9. Chang - Hwan Kim, Educational thought of Humanism, Publisher, 2007.
  10. Cheon-gie Kim, Improving Policy of International Competitiveness and Deepening of Education Inequality, Sociology of Education, 4(1), 61-83, 1994.
  11. Cheon-gie Kim, Critical Study on Educational Reform with Marketing Logic for Globalization. Sociology of Education, 7(3), 219- 238, 1997.
  12. Cheon-gie Kim, A critical study on hegemonic discourse of the educational policy of Lee Muyng-bak's government : the discourse of the low educability of the public schools, Korean journal of sociology of education, 19(1), 81-102, 2009.
  13. Cheon-gie Kim, The process and characteristics of neoliberaliztion of Korea education : Becoming like competitive cram schools and establishment of neoliberal governmentality, The Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 119-149, 2012.
  14. Tae-Kyun Kim, "Education movement starting from the real struggle challenge, Is responsible for the future", The Radical Review, 38, 130-143, 2008.
  15. Hak-Han Kim, "Neoliberalism and public education catastrophe", Education Review, 1, 52-62, 2000.
  16. http://www.kdi.re.kr/infor/ep_view_source.jsp?num=12973&menu=1
  17. Ji-Eun Lyu, Review on Equality and Excellence from the Perspective of Education, CNU Journal of Educational Studies, 28(2), 1-16, 2007.
  18. Sun-Gik Park, Concept and direction of education excellence, Korea Education Development Institute, 2-18, 2006.
  19. Jung-Soo Park, "Neoliberalism and university reform", Law and Public Administration, 10, 176-195, 2003.
  20. Sang-Jin Ban, Korea Education, where to go?. The Korean Educational Association, 2005.
  21. Kwan-Su An, The Characteristics of Maum Humanities: Understanding in Concept of 'Building', The Journal of Digital Policy & Management, 9(2), 153-164, 2011.
  22. http://www.womennews.co.kr/news/43313
  23. Ookwhan Oh, Dilemmatic relationship between public value and private freedom in education, Korean journal of sociology of education, 18(1), 93-109, 2008.
  24. Korean National Commission for UNESCO, What will you do for Human Rights Education, Seoul: ORUEM Publishing House, 2000.
  25. Jeong-il Yun, Su-hyeon Jeong, Diagnosis of school education in Korea, Seoul:JIPMOON Publishing House, 2003.
  26. Sung-ho Lee, "The role of counseling and education of humanism for self-realization", Youth counseling research, 4, 55-66, 1996.
  27. Ju-ho Lee, Future of the Republic of Korea and the University : Of Education, Science and Technology, and positive change, Wonkwang University lecture. 2011.9.15.
  28. Chae-Hong Lim, Neo-liberalistic Higher Education Policy and the Public Education, Democratic Legal Studies Association, 24, 171-206, 2003.
  29. Sang-Sik Jo, "Lee Myung-bak administration's education policy: Critical review of MB Government"s Education Policy", Education Criticism, 24, 38-53, 2008.
  30. http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/opinion/editorial/499205.html
  31. Jun-Sang Han, Interpreting Education Policy under the 'civil Government' and the Prospects for Education Reform by the Following Government, Critical Review of History, 140-177, 2007.
  32. Ulrich Beck, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Theory, culture and society, 1992.
  33. Woong-Sun Hong, "Industrial society and humanistic education", Yonsei University Graduate School of Education, 1-9, 1979.
  34. Th. W. Adorno, Theorie der Halbbildung, Adorno, Th. W.; Gesellschafts-theorie und Kulturkritik Frankfurt/M. pp. 66-94, 1975.
  35. M. Apple, The politics of official knowledge; Does a national curriculum make sense?, Teachers Colledge Record, 95(2), pp. 321-331, 1993.
  36. D. Aspin, J. Chapman, & V. Wilkinson, Quality schooling: A programmatic approach to some current problems, topics and issues, London: Cassell, 1994.
  37. N. Davies, The school report: The hidden truth about Britain's Classrooms, 2007.
  38. H. Gardner, Leading Minds, Basic Books, 1995.
  39. huntsun.tistory.com/153
  40. F. I. Niethammer, Der Streit des Philanthropopinismus und Humanismus in der Theorie des Erziehungsunterrichts unserer Zeit, Jena, 1808.
  41. John Rawls, A theory of justice, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971.
  42. K. A. Strike, "Is there a conflict between equity and excellence?", Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 409-416, 1985.
  43. J. VanTassel-Baska, Excellence as a standard for all education, Roeper Review, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 9-12, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199709553843

피인용 문헌

  1. An Analysis of School Change of A Middle School according to the Free Semester Policy vol.14, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.1.33