Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Maxillary Resorption under Complete Dentures Opposing Mandibular Implant Supported Fixed Prosthesis: A Literature Review and Case Report

하악 임플란트 고정성 보철에 대합되는 상악 총의치 하방의 골흡수에 대한 고찰 및 증례보고

  • Kim, Bo-Kuk (Department of Proshodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim, Yu-Lee (Department of Proshodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 김보국 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김유리 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2013.09.25
  • Accepted : 2013.11.16
  • Published : 2013.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

When restoring edentulous patients with lower complete denture, the smaller supportive and retentive area of mandible can lead to poor support and stability, denture dislodgement and pain resulting discomfort. In this situation, implant prosthesis can improve esthetics, stability and occlusal force. Whereas, patients with a upper complete denture can adjust more easier because of palate. Therefore, it is suggested to rehabilitate fully edentulous patients with lower implant-supported, upper complete denture as one of the treatment options. So, we are going to report the case and literature review about how the lower implant prosthesis opposing to upper complete denture affects the bone resorption of maxillary residual ridge.

완전 무치악 환자를 총의치로 수복할 때 특히 하악의 경우 유지, 지지 면적이 상악보다 좁아 의치의 탈락, 불량한 지지 및 안정성, 통증을 유발하여 의치의 사용이 불편할 수 있다. 이런 환자에서 임플란트를 이용한 보철수복은 심미성, 안정성, 저작력을 향상시킬 수 있다. 반면 상악 완전무치악은 구개를 이용할 수 있으므로 총의치로 수복하였을 때 많은 환자들이 잘 적응하여 사용하고 있다. 이에 상하악 완전 무치악 환자의 치료 옵션으로 하악은 임플란트로 지지를 받는 고정성 보철물 또는 임플란트 오버덴쳐로 수복하고 상악은 연조직에 의해 지지를 받는 전통적인 총의치로 수복하는 전악 보철수복이 제시되었다. 이 때 상악 총의치에 대합하는 하악 임플란트 고정성 보철이 상악 잔존치조제의 골흡수에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지에 대한 문헌고찰과 함께 증례를 보고하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Advanced analysis of Korean national oral health survey. Ministry of health & welfare 2011;320-349.
  2. Rissin L, House JE, Manly RS. Clinical comparison of masticatory performance and electromyographic activity of patients with complete dentures, overdentures and natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:508-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(78)80181-4
  3. Carr AB, Laney WR. Maximum occlusal force levels in patients with osseointegrated oral implant prostheses and patients with complete dentures. Int J Oral & Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:101-108.
  4. Pietrokovski J. The bony residual ridge in man. J Prosthet Dent 1975;34:456-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(75)90166-3
  5. Parkinson CF. Similarities in resorption patterns of maxillary and mandibular ridges. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:598-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(78)80066-3
  6. Kelly, E. Changes caused by a mandibular removable partial denture opposing a maxillary complete denture. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:140-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90190-4
  7. Saunders TR, Gillis RE Jr, Desjardins RP. The maxillary complete denture opposing the mandibular bilateral distal extension partial denture: treatment considerations. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:124-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90292-0
  8. Misch CE. Dental implant prosthetics. 2003. Mosby
  9. Lechner SK, Mammen A. Combination syndrome in relation to ossointegrated implant-supportedoverdentures : a survey. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:58-64.
  10. Barber HD. Evaluation of anterior maxillary alveolar ridge resorption when opposed by the transmandibular implant. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 48:1283-1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(90)90483-I
  11. Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D, Nys M, Naert I. Maxillary bone resorption in patients with implantsupported overdenture or fixed prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:135-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90008-C
  12. Henry PJ. Bower RC, Wall CD. Rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible with osseointegrated dental implants: 10 year follow-up. Aust Dent J 1995;40:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1995.tb05604.x
  13. Zarb GA. Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The toronto study. part III: Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:185-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90177-E
  14. Tymstra N, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Meijer HJA. Maxillary anterior and mandibular posterior residual ridge resorption in patients wearing a mandibular implant-retained overdenture. J Oral Rehabil 2011; 38:509-516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02180.x
  15. Saurabh Gupta, Sybille K. Lechner, Norton A. Duckmanton. Maxillary changes under complete dentures opposing mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses. Int J Proshodont 1999;12:492-497.
  16. Narhi TO, Geertman ME, Hevinga M, Abdo H, Kalk W. Changes in the edentulous maxilla in persons wearing implant-retained mandibular overdentures. J Prosthet dent 2000;84:43-49. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.107113
  17. Lang BR, Razzoog ME. Lingualized intergration: tooth molds and an occlusal scheme for edentulous implant patients. Implant Dent 1992;1:204-211. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199200130-00007
  18. Visser A, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ, Vissink A. Implant retained maxillary overdentures on milled bar suprastructures: a 10-year follow-up of surgical and prosthetic care and aftercare. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:181-192.
  19. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:120-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90188-6