DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Exploratory Research on Moderate Effect of Customization and R&D Strategy to Relationship between Quality Management Practices and Performances

품질경영 실행방식과 성과에 대한 customization 및 R&D 전략의 조절 효과에 대한 탐색적 연구

  • Received : 2013.12.07
  • Accepted : 2013.12.14
  • Published : 2013.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate if companies' efforts of quality management practices have positive impacts on the companies' performance as the first stage. In the second stage of this study, we tried to confirm if the degree of companies' making efforts on customization strategy and R&D strategy function as moderate variable on relationship between quality management practices and companies' performance. Methods: The collected data through survey were analysed using multiple regression for the first stage of the study and moderate regression for the second one of it. Results: The results of this study are as follows; quality management practices have positive effect on performances. Moreover, much effort on customization strategy has significant moderate effect on relationship between quality management practices and corporate performance. On the other hand, much effort of companies on R&D strategy has significant moderate effect on the relationship between the two as well. Conclusion: Manufacturing and services companies in Korea need to make effort of quality management practices in order to improve corporate performance. Moreover, if that efforts are combined with customization strategy and R&D strategy, they will expect synergy effect on performance improvement.

Keywords

References

  1. Bossink, B. A. G., Gieskes, J. F. B., and Pas, T. N. M. 1992. "Diagnosing Total Quality Management-part 1." Total Quality Management 3(3):223-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544129200000030
  2. Cho, Seong-Pyo, and Chung, Jae-Yong. 2001. "The Effect of R&D Expenditures on Subsequent Earnings." Korean Management Review 30(1):289-315.
  3. Cho, Seong-Pyo, Kim, Eun-Sil, Park, Sun-Young, and Kim, Sung-Yong. 2013. "Longitudinal Analysis on the Relationship between R&D Performance and Company Strategy using Technology and Value Matrix for Sustainable Growth." Korean Management Review 42(5):1437-1464.
  4. Choi, Jung-Ho. 1994. "The Effect of Advertising and Research and Development Expenditures on the Firm Value: An Empirical Analysis by Tobin's Q." Accounting Review 19:103-124.
  5. Chung, Soong-Hwan, and Woo, Sung-Kun. 2003. "The Effects of TQM on Service Quality." Journal of The Korean Production and Operations Management Society 13(3):69-93.
  6. Flynn, B. B., and Flynn, E. J. 2000. "The Relationship Between Quality and Other Dimensions of Competitive Performance: Tradeoff or Compatibility?" Academy of Management Proceedings, OM:1-6.
  7. Flynn, B. B., Sakakibara, S., and Schroeder, R. G. 1995. "Relationship Between JIT And TQM: Practices and Performance." Academy of Management Journal 38(5):1325-1360. https://doi.org/10.2307/256860
  8. Franke, M. Schreier, and Kaiser, U. 2010. "The 'I Design It Myself' Effect in Mass Customization." Management Science 56(1):125-140. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1077
  9. Garvin, D. A., 1986. "Quality Problems, Policies, and Attitudes in United States and Japan: an Exploratory Study." Academy of Management Journal 29(4):653-673. https://doi.org/10.2307/255938
  10. Hirschey, M., and Weygandt, J. J. 1985. "Amortization Policy for Advertising and Research and Development Expenditures." Journal of Accounting Research 23:326-335. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490921
  11. Jeong, Ki Shik, and Lee, Jeong Gil. 1996. "Effects of Advertisement and R&D costs on Corporate Value." Korea Industrial Economic Association Journal 9:395-417.
  12. Kim, Dong-Young, Kumar, V., and Kumar, U. 2012. "Relationship between quality management practices and innovation." Journal of Operations Management 30:295-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2012.02.003
  13. Lev, B., and Sougiannis, T. 1996. "The Capitalization, Amortization and Value-relevance of R&D." Journal of Accounting & Economics 21:107-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(95)00410-6
  14. McLachlin, R. 1997. "Management initiatives and Just-In-Time manufacturing." Journal of Operations Management 15:271-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(97)00010-7
  15. Miceli, G. N., Raimondo, M. A., and Farace, S. 2013. "Customer Attitude and Dispositions Towards Customized Product: The Interaction Between Customization Model and Brand." Journal of Interactive Marketing 27:209-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.03.001
  16. Park, Jeong Soo, Chang, Deok Shin, and Kim, Soo Wook. 2010. "Moderate Effect of JIT and Workforce Management on Infra and Process Factor in Quality Management Practices." Korean Management Science Review 27(3):99-115.
  17. Saraph, J. V., and Sebastian, R. J. 1992. "Human Resource Strategies for Effective Introduction of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies(AMT)." Production and Inventory Management Journal, 1st Quarter:64-70.
  18. Simonson, I. 2005. "Determinants of Customer's response to Customized Offers: Conceptual Framework and Research Propositions." Journal of Marketing 69(1):32-45. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.69.1.32.55512