Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management (품질경영학회지)

Korean Society for Quality Management (한국품질경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Excellence for Organization Quality Management Innovation Challenge -Comparison of Korea and China-

초우량 조직을 위한 품질경영혁신 도전 -한국과 중국의 비교-

  • Received : 2013.11.12
  • Accepted : 2013.11.25
  • Published : 2013.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Quality Innovation Managements recently focus on developing relationship with customers to meet their requirements and enhance loyalty in the competitive environments in Countries. The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of innovation, quality, satisfaction and customer loyalty. Methods: After reviewing the literatures, the structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted test the research model. The data was collected from Quality Leader by the questionnaire In Korea and China. Results: The results of SEM show that hardware innovation quality have a positive effect on customer satisfaction. Customer Satisfaction have a positive effect on customer satisfaction. Conclusion: The authors demonstrate that the hardware innovation quality is related positively to customer satisfaction. And customer satisfaction has a positive effect on customer loyalty. A number of notable findings are reported including the empirical verification that hardware innovation quality, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty may all be directly related to business performance.

Keywords

References

  1. Alford, Bruce L., and Daniel, L. Sherrell. 1996. "The Role of Affect in Consumer Satisfaction Judgments of Credence-Based Services." Journal of Business Research 37(September):71-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(96)00030-6
  2. Andreassen, Tor Wallin and Lindestad, Bodil. 1998. "Customer loyalty and complex services: The impact of corporate image on quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty for customers with varying degrees of service expertise." International Journal of Service Industry Management 9(1):7-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564239810199923
  3. Bartel, C. A., and Garud, R. 2009. "The Role of Narratives in Sustaining Organizational Innovation. Organization Science." 20(1):107-117. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0372
  4. Brady, M. K., and Robertson, C. J. 2001. "Searching for a consensus on the antecedent role of service quality and satisfaction: an exploratory cross-national study" Journal of Business Research 51(1):53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00041-7
  5. Drucker, P. 1974. Management. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinenmann.
  6. Evans, J. R. 2011. Quality, Management, Organization and Strategy. South-Western Cengage Learning.
  7. Gronroos, C. 2000. Service management and marketing. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  8. Guan, J. C., Yam, R. C. M., Mok, C. K., and Ma, N. 2006. "A study of the relationship between competitiveness and technological innovation capability based on DEA models." European Journal of Operational Research 170(1):971-986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.07.054
  9. Ha, Jong Dae. 2013. "China Dream, Reality of Taiwan."Donga newspaper, October 16.
  10. Hamel, G. 2006. "The Why, What, and How of Management Innovation." Harvard Business Review. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.
  11. Heskett, J. L., Jones, T. O., Lovemann, G. W., Sasser, W. E., Schlesinger, L. A. 1994. "Putting the service-profit chain to work." Harvard Business Review 72(2):164-174.
  12. Heskett, J. L., and Sasser, W. E. 2010. The Service Profit Chain: From Satisfaction to Ownership, Handbook of Service Science. Publisher Springer.
  13. Hutchinsona, J., Laib, F., and Wang, Y. 2009. "Understanding the relationships of quality, value, equity, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions among golf travelers." International Journal of Tourism Management 30(2):298-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.07.010
  14. Johnson, M. D., and Fornell, C. 1991. "A Framework for comparing customer satisfaction across individuals and product categories." Journal of Economic Psychology 12(2):267-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(91)90016-M
  15. Kim, Nan Do. 2013. Trend China. Owooa.
  16. Kim, S. C., and Lee, H. S. 2002. "A Study of Service Orientation, Human Resource Satisfaction, Customer Orientation Effects on Performance in Hospital." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 30(2):11-25.
  17. Kim, Tae Wan. 2013. "China CKGSB Shanbing Interview." Korea Economy Daily, October 22.
  18. Kim, Yun Hee. 2013. "Take care of Made In USA."Maile Daily Eeconomy, October 17.
  19. King, G. S., and Jeong, S. T. 2013. "A Empirical Study on the Structural Equation Modeling of LEAN-NPD Application." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 41(3):355-370. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2013.41.3.355
  20. Mittal, V., and Kamakura, W. A. 2001. "Satisfaction, Repurchase Intent, and Repurchase Behavior: Investigating the Moderating Effect of Customer Characteristics." Journal of Marketing Research 38(1):131-142. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.1.131.18832
  21. Oliver, R. L. 1997. Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective of the Consumer. NY: McGraw-Hill.
  22. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., and Berry, L. 1988. "SERVQUAL: A multiple item scale for measuring customer perceptions of service quality." Journal of Retailing 64(1):12-40.
  23. Park, Y. T. 2002. "Best Practice of Quality Management in the World-Class Companies, Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management." 30(2):181-201.
  24. Schermerhorn, J. R. 2010. Introduction to Management. Wiely.
  25. Shanghai Association for Quality (http://222.66.64.131:8080/zx/zxen/index.jsp).
  26. Valarie, Zeithaml, Berry, and Parasuraman. 1996. "The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality." The Journal of Marketing 60(2):31-46.
  27. Woodruff, R. 1997. "Customer value: the next source for competitive advantage." Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25(2):139-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894350