DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Estimation of Daily Milk Yields from AM/PM Milking Records

  • Lee, Deukhwan (Department of Animal Life Resources, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Min, Hongrip (Dairy Cattle Improvement Center, National Agriculture Cooperatives Federation)
  • Received : 2013.09.06
  • Accepted : 2013.10.24
  • Published : 2013.12.31

Abstract

Daily milk yields on test days were estimated using morning or afternoon partial milk yields collected by official agencies and the accuracy of the estimates was determined. Test-day data for milk yields consisted of 3,156,734 records of AM/PM partial milking measurements of 255,437 milking Holstein cows from 3,708 farms collected from December 2008 to April 2013. A linear regression model (LRM) was applied to estimate daily milk yields using alternate AM/PM milk yield records within lactation stages, milking intervals, and parities on every daily milk yield. The alternate statistical approach was a non-linear hierarchical model (NHM) in which Brody's growth function was implemented by reflecting an animal's physiological milk production cycle. When compared with LRM, daily milk yields predicted by the NHM were assumed to be functionally related to day in milk (or lactation) stage, milking intervals, and partial milk yields. Since the results were in terms of accuracies based on comparisons of different statistical models, accuracies of estimates of daily milk yields by NHM were close to those determined by the LRM. The average of these accuracies was 0.94 for AM partial milk yields and 0.93 for PM partial milk yields for first calving cows. However, the accuracies of AM/PM milk yield estimations from cows under a calving stage higher than the first parity were 0.96 and 0.95, respectively. Correlations between the estimated daily milk yields and the actual daily milk yields ranged from 0.96~0.98. These accuracies were lower for unbalanced AM/PM milking intervals and the first calving cows. Overall, prediction of daily milk yields by NHM would be more appropriate than by LRM due to its flexibility under different milk yield-related circumstances, which provides an idea of the functional relationship between milking intervals and days in milk with daily milk yields from statistical viewpoints.

Keywords

References

  1. Barash, H., Silanikove, N., Shamay, A. and Ezra, E. 2001. Interrelationships among ambient temperature, day length, and milk yield in dairy cows under a Mediterranean climate. J. Dairy Sci. 84:2314-2320. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74679-6
  2. Brody, S. 1945. Bioenergetics and growth. Reinhold Publishing Co., New York, NY.
  3. Cassandro, M., Carnier, P., Gallo, L., Mantovani, R., Contiero, B. and Bittante, G. 1995. Bias and accuracy of single milking testing schemes to estimate daily and lactation milk yield. J. Daily Sci. 78:2884-2893. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76919-3
  4. DeLorenzo, M. H. and Winggans, G. R. 1986. Factors for estimating daily yield of milk, fat and protein from a single milking for herds milked twice a day. J. Dairy Sci. 69:2386-2394. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(86)80678-6
  5. DHIA. 2010. Simplifying DHI test plans. National DHIA, National Dairy Herd Information Association (www.dhia.org, accessed by Jul. 2013).
  6. Durr, J. and Reents, R. 2013. INTERBULL-30 years of history. (www-interbull.slu.se, accessed by Jul. 2013).
  7. Hargrove, G. L. 1994. Bias in composite milk samples with unequal milking intervals. J. Dairy Sci. 77:1917-1921. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77134-4
  8. ICAR. 2011. International agreement of recording practices. ICAR Guidelines. International Committee for Animal Recording (ICAR), Rome, Italy.
  9. INTERBULL. 2013. National GES information. (http://www-interbull. slu.se/national_ges_info2/ framesida-ges.htm, accessed by Jul. 2013).
  10. Jenko, J., Perpar, T., Gorjanc, G. and Babnik, D. 2010. Evaluation of different approaches for the estimation of daily yield from single milk testing scheme in cattle. J. Dairy Res. 77:137-143. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029909990586
  11. Klopcic, M., Koops, W. J. and Kuipers, A. 2013. A mathematical function to predict daily milk yield of dairy cows in relation to the interval between milkings. J. Dairy Sci. 96:6084-6090. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6391
  12. Lee, A. J. and Wardrop, J. 1984. Predicting daily milk yield, fat present, and protein present from morning and afternoon tests. J. Dairy Sci. 67:351-360. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81308-9
  13. Lee, C., Pollak, E. J. and Everett, R. W. 1995. Multiplicative factors for estimation of daily milk and component yields from single morning or afternoon tests. J. Daily Sci. 78:221-235. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76631-0
  14. Liu, Z., Reents, R., Reinhardt, F. and Kuwan, K. 2000. Approaches to estimating daily yield from single milk test schemes and use of a.m.-p.m. records in test-day model genetic evaluation in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 83:2672-2682. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75161-7
  15. Ministry of agriculture, food and rural affairs (MAFRA). 2013. Enforcement Guidelines for agriculture, food and rural affairs, Livestock Improvement (Public affairs). MAFRA.
  16. Muir, B. L., Fatehi, J. and Schaeffer, L. R. 2004. Genetic relationships between persistency and reproductive performance in first-lactation Canadian Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 87:3029-3037. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73435-9
  17. National Agriculture Cooperatives Federation. 2011. Yearly report for National Dairy Herd Improvement (2011). P90. National Agriculture Cooperatives Federation.
  18. Neal, H. D. and Thornley, J. H. M. 1983. The lactation curve in cattle: A mathematical model of the mammary gland. J. Agric. Sci. 101:389-400. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600037710
  19. Plaut, K. and Casey, T. 2012. Does the circadian system regulate lactation? Animal 6:394-402. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111002187
  20. Schaeffer, L. R., Jamrozik, J., VanDorp, R., Kelton, D. F. and Lazenby, D. W. 2000. Estimating daily yields of cows from different milking schemes. Livest. Prod. Sci. 65:219-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00153-6
  21. Silanikove, N., Maltz, E., Halevi, A. and Shinder, D. 1997. Metabolism of water, sodium, potassium and chlorine by high yielding dairy cows at the onset of lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 80:949-956. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76019-3
  22. USDA. 2013. Estimating daily yields when not all milkings are weighed and sampled (AP Plans). USDA-AIPL (www.aipl. arsusda.gov, accessed by Jul. 2013).
  23. Wiggans, G. R. 1986. Estimating daily yields of cows milked three times a day. J. Dairy Sci. 69:2935-2940. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(86)80749-4

Cited by

  1. Environmental factors influencing acetone and Environmental factors influencing acetone and β-hydroxybutyrate acid contents in raw milk of Holstein dairy cattle vol.26, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2015.26.3.687