Genomics & Informatics

  • 제11권4호
  • /
  • Pages.186-190
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1598-866X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-0742(eISSN)
한국유전체학회 (Korea Genome Organization)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Perspectives on Clinical Informatics: Integrating Large-Scale Clinical, Genomic, and Health Information for Clinical Care

  • Choi, In Young (Department of Medical Informatics, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Min (Department of Medical Informatics, MRC, IRCGP, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Myung Shin (Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Mun, Seong K. (Department of Medical Informatics, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Chung, Yeun-Jun (Department of Microbiology, Department of Medical Informatics, Integrated Research Center for Genome Polymorphism (IRCGP), MRC, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2013.10.18
  • 심사 : 2013.11.20
  • 발행 : 2013.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The advances in electronic medical records (EMRs) and bioinformatics (BI) represent two significant trends in healthcare. The widespread adoption of EMR systems and the completion of the Human Genome Project developed the technologies for data acquisition, analysis, and visualization in two different domains. The massive amount of data from both clinical and biology domains is expected to provide personalized, preventive, and predictive healthcare services in the near future. The integrated use of EMR and BI data needs to consider four key informatics areas: data modeling, analytics, standardization, and privacy. Bioclinical data warehouses integrating heterogeneous patient-related clinical or omics data should be considered. The representative standardization effort by the Clinical Bioinformatics Ontology (CBO) aims to provide uniquely identified concepts to include molecular pathology terminologies. Since individual genome data are easily used to predict current and future health status, different safeguards to ensure confidentiality should be considered. In this paper, we focused on the informatics aspects of integrating the EMR community and BI community by identifying opportunities, challenges, and approaches to provide the best possible care service for our patients and the population.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Lee J, Kuo YF, Goodwin JS. The effect of electronic medical record adoption on outcomes in US hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res 2013;13:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-39
  2. Laakko T, Leppänen J, Lahteenmaki J, Nummiaho A. Mobile health and wellness application framework. Methods Inf Med 2008;47:217-222.
  3. Hood L, Galas D. The digital code of DNA. Nature 2003; 421:444-448. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01410
  4. Weston AD, Hood L. Systems biology, proteomics, and the future of health care: toward predictive, preventative, and personalized medicine. J Proteome Res 2004;3:179-196. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr0499693
  5. Wang X, Liotta L. Clinical bioinformatics: a new emerging science. J Clin Bioinforma 2011;1:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2043-9113-1-1
  6. Bernstam EV, Smith JW, Johnson TR. What is biomedical informatics? J Biomed Inform 2010;43:104-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2009.08.006
  7. Sanz F, Brunak S, Lopez-Alonso V. INBIOMEDvision: promoting and monitoring biomedical informatics in Europe. In: The 23rd International Conference of the European Federation for Medical Informatics Conference, 2011 Aug 28-31, Oslo.
  8. The eMERGE Network. Nashville: eMERGE Network, 2013. Accessed 2013 Nov 1. Available from: http://emerge.mc. vanderbilt.edu/.
  9. Hanauer DA, Zheng K, Ramakrishnan N, Keller BJ. Opportunities and challenges in association and episode discovery from electronic health records. IEEE Intell Syst 2011;26:83-87.
  10. Lin YK, Brown RA, Yang HJ, Li SH, Lu HM, Chen H. Data mining large-scale electronic health records for clinical support. IEEE Intell Syst 2011;26:87-90.
  11. American Medical Informatics Association. Bethesda: AMIA, 2013. Accessed 2013 Nov 26. Available from: http://www.amia. org/mbrcenter/wg/gen/.
  12. Bainbridge MN, Wiszniewski W, Murdock DR, Friedman J, Gonzaga-Jauregui C, Newsham I, et al. Whole-genome sequencing for optimized patient management. Sci Transl Med 2011;3:87re83.
  13. Lindhurst MJ, Sapp JC, Teer JK, Johnston JJ, Finn EM, Peters K, et al. A mosaic activating mutation in AKT1 associated with the Proteus syndrome. N Engl J Med 2011;365:611-619. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1104017
  14. Lupski JR, Reid JG, Gonzaga-Jauregui C, Rio Deiros D, Chen DC, Nazareth L, et al. Whole-genome sequencing in a patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:1181-1191. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0908094
  15. Ng SB, Buckingham KJ, Lee C, Bigham AW, Tabor HK, Dent KM, et al. Exome sequencing identifies the cause of a mendelian disorder. Nat Genet 2010;42:30-35. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.499
  16. St Hilaire C, Ziegler SG, Markello TC, Brusco A, Groden C, Gill F, et al. NT5E mutations and arterial calcifications. N Engl J Med 2011;364:432-442. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0912923
  17. Worthey EA, Mayer AN, Syverson GD, Helbling D, Bonacci BB, Decker B, et al. Making a definitive diagnosis: successful clinical application of whole exome sequencing in a child with intractable inflammatory bowel disease. Genet Med 2011;13: 255-262. https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182088158
  18. Chen H, Chiang RH, Storey VC. Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Q 2012;36:1165- 1188.
  19. Collins FS, Patrinos A, Jordan E, Chakravarti A, Gesteland R, Walters L. New goals for the U.S. Human Genome Project: 1998-2003. Science 1998;282:682-689. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5389.682
  20. Benson DA, Boguski MS, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Ouellette BF, Rapp BA, et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 1999;27:12-17. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/27.1.12
  21. Bairoch A, Apweiler R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:45-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.45
  22. Saxonov S, Daizadeh I, Fedorov A, Gilbert W. EID: the Exon-Intron Database-an exhaustive database of protein-coding intron-containing genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:185-190. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.185
  23. Ruiz M, Giudicelli V, Ginestoux C, Stoehr P, Robinson J, Bodmer J, et al. IMGT, the international ImMunoGeneTics database. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:219-221. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.219
  24. Lindberg D, Humpreys B. The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) and computer-based patient records. In: Aspects of the Computer-Based Patient Record (Ball MJ, Collen MF, eds.). New York: Springer-Verlag, 1992. pp. 16-75.
  25. Hoffman MA. The genome-enabled electronic medical record. J Biomed Inform 2007;40:44-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2006.02.010
  26. Hoffman M, Arnoldi C, Chuang I. The clinical bioinformatics ontology: a curated semantic network utilizing RefSeq information. Pac Symp Biocomput 2005:139-150.
  27. Kohane IS. Bioinformatics and clinical informatics: the imperative to collaborate. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000;7:512-516. https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2000.0070512
  28. Gelfand A. Privacy and biomedical research: building a trust infrastructure: an exploration of data-driven and process-driven approaches to data privacy. Biomed Comput Rev 2011/2012 winter:23-28.

피인용 문헌

  1. Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff vol.10, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129506
  2. The Clinical Data Intelligence Project vol.39, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-015-0913-x
  3. A Precision Medicine Initiative for Alzheimer’s disease: the road ahead to biomarker-guided integrative disease modeling vol.20, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2017.1287866
  4. A Typology of Future Health Services by Exploring Core Concepts and Values vol.37, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000488