Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

  • 제39권6호
  • /
  • Pages.269-273
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 2234-7550(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-5930(eISSN)
대한구강악안면외과학회 (The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of rotation bump on removal torque of orthodontic mini-implants

  • Gansukh, Odontuya (Department of Orthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jeong, Jong-Wha (Department of Orthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Wan (Department of Orthodontics, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Young-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Woo (Department of Orthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2013.10.07
  • 심사 : 2013.10.21
  • 발행 : 2013.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: This study is designed to evaluate the mechanical stability of orthodontic mini-implants with vertical grooves in rabbits. Materials and Methods: This study was done from March 2011 to February 2012 in Dental Research Institute of Seoul National University. Thirty-two mini-implants in the control group and 32 in the rotation bump (RB) group were inserted in the tibias of 16 rabbits and were removed after two weeks and four weeks, respectively. The maximum insertion torque (MIT), maximum removal torque (MRT), torque ratio (TR) of MRT to MIT and removal angular momentum (RAM) were all measured at the time of removal. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in MIT and MRT at two weeks or four weeks. However, TR and RAM at four weeks in the RB group were significantly higher than in the control group (P<0.05). TR of the RB group was significantly increased at four weeks (P<0.05). In both groups, RAM at four weeks was significantly higher than at two weeks (P<0.05). Conclusion: These results suggest that RB of the mini-implant could provide resistance to the removal rotation, although it did not increase the MRT.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chen Y, Kyung HM, Gao L, Yu WJ, Bae EJ, Kim SM. Mechanical properties of self-drilling orthodontic micro-implants with different diameters. Angle Orthod 2010;80:821-7. https://doi.org/10.2319/103009-607.1
  2. Kim YK, Kim YJ, Yun PY, Kim JW. Effects of the taper shape, dual-thread, and length on the mechanical properties of mini-implants. Angle Orthod 2009;79:908-14. https://doi.org/10.2319/071808-374.1
  3. Herrmann I, Lekholm U, Holm S, Kultje C. Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potential prognostic factors for oral implant failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:220-30.
  4. Reynders R, Ronchi L, Bipat S. Mini-implants in orthodontics: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:564.e1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.02.003
  5. Kim JW, Baek SH, Kim TW, Chang YI. Comparison of stability between cylindrical and conical type mini-implants. Mechanical and histological properties. Angle Orthod 2008;78:692-8. https://doi.org/10.2319/0003-3219(2008)078[0692:COSBCA]2.0.CO;2
  6. Kim TW, Baek SH, Kim JW, Chang YI. Effects of microgrooves on the success rate and soft tissue adaptation of orthodontic miniscrews. Angle Orthod 2008;78:1057-64. https://doi.org/10.2319/101707-496.1
  7. Kim JW, Ahn SJ, Chang YI. Histomorphometric and mechanical analyses of the drill-free screw as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:190-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.01.030
  8. Sullivan DY, Sherwood RL, Collins TA, Krogh PH. The reverse-torque test: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:179-85.
  9. Linkow LI. The press-fit/tap-in, anti-rotational vent-plant cylinder implant. J Oral Implantol 1995;21:40-5.
  10. Ueda M, Matsuki M, Jacobsson M, Tjellström A. Relationship between insertion torque and removal torque analyzed in fresh temporal bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:442-7.
  11. Consolo U, Travaglini D, Todisco M, Trisi P, Galli S. Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of the effects of implant insertion torque on peri-implant bone healing. J Craniofac Surg 2013;24:860-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31827ca3cf
  12. Lee SY, Piao C, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Lee JH, Kim TH, et al. A comparison of bone bed preparation with laser and conventional drill on the relationship between implant stability quotient (ISQ) values and implant insertion variables. J Adv Prosthodont 2010;2:148-53. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2010.2.4.148
  13. Kim SH, Lee SJ, Cho IS, Kim SK, Kim TW. Rotational resistance of surface-treated mini-implants. Angle Orthod 2009;79:899-907. https://doi.org/10.2319/090608-466.1
  14. Costa A, Raffainl M, Melsen B. Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1998;13:201-9.
  15. Kwon TK, Lee HJ, Min SK, Yeo IS. Evaluation of early bone response to fluoride-modified and anodically oxidized titanium implants through continuous removal torque analysis. Implant Dent 2012;21:427-32. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31826917f6
  16. Ahn SJ, Leesungbok R, Lee SW. Histomorphometric analysis and removal torque of small diameter implants with alternative surface treatments and different designs. J Oral Implantol 2010;36:263-72. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00052
  17. Oltramari-Navarro PV, Navarro RL, Henriques JF, Cestari TM, Francischone CE, Taga R, et al. The impact of healing time before loading on orthodontic mini-implant stability: a histomorphometric study in minipigs. Arch Oral Biol 2013;58:806-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.12.010