The Journal of the Korean dental association (대한치과의사협회지)

The Korean Dental Association (대한치과의사협회)
권호 표지

Clinical considerations for successful results in FOS(Functional Orthognathic Surgery): Surgery first orthodontic treatment later

임상가를 위한 특집 1 - 성공적인 선 수술 교정 치료를 위한 고려사항

  • Received : 2012.01.07
  • Accepted : 2012.01.17
  • Published : 2012.02.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The fundamental principles and the role of surgeons and orthodontists to produce successful results in orthodontic treatment combined with orthognathic surgery is not different from those of conventional procedures and FOS: surgery-first-orthodontic-treatment-later approach. The communication and cooperation between surgeon and orthodontist is of crucial importance. In FOS, the pre-surgical orthodontic preparation is not carried out in the patient's mouth, but in the mounted stone model and in addition to the simulation of tooth movement, to get a precise surgical occlusion, the entire steps of treatment should be simulated on the articulator as well. Right after the surgery, due to the instability of the occlusion, appropriate post operational care should be given according to the surgical technique applied to the mandible by use of final surgical wafer about 8 weeks.

Keywords

References

  1. Arnett GW, Gunson MJ, McLaughlln RP, The Essence of Beauty.
  2. Park IC, Bowman D, Klapper L, A cephalometric study of Korean adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:54-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(89)90229-1
  3. Burstone CJ, James RB, Legan H, Murphy GA, Norton LA. Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 1978;36:269-77.
  4. Bowker WE, Meredith HV, A metric analysis of the facial profile, Angle Orthod 1959;29:149-160.
  5. Rlcketts RM, Cephalometric analysis and synthesis. Angle Orthod 1961;31:141-156.
  6. Burstone CJ. The integumental profile. Am J Orthod 1958;44:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(58)90178-7
  7. Burstone CJ. Integumental contour and extension patterns. Angle Orthod 1959;29:93.
  8. Burstone CJ. Lip posture and its significance in tretment planning. Am J Orthod 1867;53;262-84.
  9. Connor AM, Moshiri F. Otrhognathic surgery norms for American black patients. Am J Orthod 1985;87:119-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(85)90021-1
  10. Lew KK, Ho KK, Keng SB, Ho KH. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in Chinese adults with esthetic facial profiles. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;50:1184-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(92)90151-O
  11. Scheideman GB, Bell WH, Legan HL, Finn RA, Reisch JS. Cephalometric analysis of dentofacial normals. Am J Orthod 1980;78:404-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(80)90021-4
  12. Wallen T, Bloomquist D. The clinical examination: Is It more Important than cephalometric analysis in surgical orthodontics? Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1986;1:179-91.
  13. Wylie GA, Fisch LC, Epker BN. Cephalometrics. A comparison of five analyses currently used in the diagnosis of the dentofacial deformities. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1987;2:15-36.
  14. Raju NS, Prasad KG, Jayade VP. A modified approach for obtaining cephalograms in natural head position. J Orthod 2001;28:25-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/28.1.25
  15. Legan HL, Burstone CJ. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 1980;38:744-51.
  16. Flynn TR, Ambrogio RI, Zelchner SJ. Cephalometric norms for orthognathic surgery in black American adults. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;47:30-9.
  17. Alcalde Re, Jinno T, Pogrel MA, Matsumura T. Cephalometric norms in Japanese adults. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;56:129-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90849-7
  18. Hyungsik Park, Jinyoung Huh, Adaptability and open bite tendency in early Functional Phsiotherapy after IVRO of the Mandibular Prognathism, KJOMS ; Vol 23. no. 1 27, 1997
  19. Hyung-Sik Park et al., A Clinical study on open bite & relapse tendency after IVRO of the mandibular Prognathism, KJOMS ; Vol 23. no. 1, 35. 1997