World Technopolis Review

World Technopolis Association (세계과학도시연합)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

S&T Theories and National Competitive Advantages in South Korea

  • Published : 2012.09.10
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To understand South Korea's economic success several contending paradigms have emerged, ranging from a neo-classical explanation to a statist perspective, and Schumpeterian structuralism. The Korean miracle can be seen as a product of multiple factors involving the strategic choice of export-led growth, timely and active human-capital investment, business activism, and individual innovative ideas. However, South Korea needs more complex and innovative ideas to continue its both economic growth and S&T Development. The ideas of Schumpeterian structuralist needs to be more emphasized. Changing state-society relations and subsequent policy choice are greatly influenced by the industrial life cycle. The industrial life cycle is closely related to the historical sequencing and diffusion of technology. The complex mixture of statist-market-Schumpeterian structuralist perspectives could lead more technologically advanced society in South Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. Amsden, A.(1989) Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization (New York, NJ: Oxford University Press).
  2. Binswanger, H., and Ruttan, V.(1978) Induced Innovation: Technology, Institutions and Development (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University).
  3. Branscomb, L.(1992) "Does America Need a Technology Policy?" Harvard Business Review (March-April):24-33.
  4. Cho, G.W.(2010) "Innovation and Entrepreneurship," Science and Technology Policy, 20(3):114-9.(in Korean)
  5. Chong, S.(2010) "The Future of IT Industry and R&D Policy," Science and Technology Policy 20(2):15. (in Korean)
  6. Dahlman, C., Ross-Larson, B., and Westphal, L.(1987) "Managing Technological Development: Lessons from the Newly Industrializing Countries," World Development 15(6):759-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(87)90058-1
  7. Hwang, D.(2010) The Paradigmatic Change of Manufacturing," Science and Technology Policy 20(1):1-3.(in Korean)
  8. Isaacson, W.(2011) Steve Jobs (New York, NJ: Simon & Schuster), xxi-260.
  9. Justman, M., and Teubal, M.(1991) "A Structural Perspective on the Role of Technology in Economic Growth and Development," World Development 19(9):1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(91)90065-P
  10. Kim, J.H.(1989) Korean Industrial Policies for Declining Industries KDI Working Paper, No.8910, (Seoul: Korea Development Institute).
  11. Kim, H.(1988) "Determinants of Technological Change in the Korean Machine Tool Industry: A Comparison of Large and Small Firms," Ph.D. Diss., University of London, pp.20-21.
  12. Lew, S-J.(1992) "Bringing Capital Back In: A Case Study of the South Korean Automobile Industrialization," Ph.D. Diss., Yale University(November)
  13. Panaritis, E.(2007) Prosperity Unbound: Building Property Markets with Trust. (New York, NJ: Palgrave Macmillan).
  14. Porter, M.E.(1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations (New York, NJ: The Free Press).
  15. Saltykov, B.(1984) "Problems Concerning Comparison of Economic, Scientific and Technological Development Levels," in Hiroke Morita-Lou (ed.) Science and Technology Indicators for Development (Boulder, CO: Westview Press), 182-3.
  16. Schumpeter, J.(1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (New York, NJ: Harper and Row).
  17. Sung, J.E.(2010) "Finland Innovative System and College- Industry Connection," Science and Technology Policy 20(3):42-51.
  18. Wade, R.(1990) Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), 131-89.
  19. Westphal, L. E., Kim, L., and Dahlman, C.(1983) Reflections on Korea's Acquisition of Technological Capability (Washington, DC: World Bank).