Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology (한국방사선학회논문지)

The Korean Society of Radiology (한국방사선학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Load Analysis of Gliding Grade under the Kaltenborn-Evjenth ConceptⓇ

칼텐본-에비엔즈컨셉 미끄러뜨림 등급의 부하량 크기에 관한 연구

  • Choi, Seok-Joo (Department of Physical Therapy, Taegu Science University) ;
  • Choi, Wan-Suk (Department of Physical Therapy, International University of Korea) ;
  • Moon, Ok-Kon (Department of Physical Therapy, KunJang University College of Korea)
  • 최석주 (대구과학대학교 물리치료과) ;
  • 최완석 (한국국제대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 문옥곤 (군장대학교 물리치료과)
  • Received : 2012.08.17
  • Accepted : 2012.10.16
  • Published : 2012.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study attempted to make comparisons in the magnitude of the applied power depending on gender, gliding direction and gliding grade when gliding treatment grade II and III under the Kaltenborn-Evjenth Concept$^{(R)}$ are applied to the caudal, ventral and dorsal shoulder joint using the loading cell equipment. As a result of load difference depending on gender, men showed a significantly higher load than women for all of Caudal Grade II/III, Ventral Grade II/III and Dorsal Grade II/III (p<.05). As a result of comparisons for load difference depending on the treatment direction, the ventral and dorsal loads were significantly higher than the caudal load for all of Grade II and Grade III (p<.05). As a result of comparisons for load difference depending on treatment grade, the load was significantly higher in Grade III than Grade II for all of the caudal, ventral and dorsal side (p<.05). Given the aforesaid results, it could be confirmed that the magnitude of the applied force at the same grade could be different depending on the direction and gender, when gliding II/III are applied to the caudal, ventral and dorsal of glenohumeral joint.

본 연구에서는 로딩셀기구를 이용하여 어깨관절의 아래, 앞, 뒤쪽 방향으로 칼텐본-에비엔즈컨셉 미끄러뜨림 치료등급 II와 III 적용 시 남녀, 미끄러뜨림 방향 그리고 미끄러뜨림 등급에 따라 적용되는 힘의 크기를 비교해보고자 하였다. 남녀에 따른 부하량 차이를 비교한 결과 아래쪽미끄러뜨림 II/III등급(Caudal Grade II/III), 앞쪽미끄러뜨림 II/III등급(Ventral Grade II/III), 뒤쪽미끄러뜨림 II/III등급(Dorsal Grade II/III) 모두 여자에 비해 남자의 부하량이 유의하게 높았다(p<.05). 치료방향에 따른 부하량 차이를 비교한 결과 등급II(Grade II)와 등급III(Grade III) 모두에서 아래쪽(Caudal)에 비해 앞쪽(Ventral)과 뒤쪽(Dorsal)에서 부하량이 유의하게 높았다(p<.05). 치료등급에 따른 부하량 차이를 비교한 결과 아래쪽(Caudal), 앞쪽(Ventral) 그리고 뒤쪽(Dorsal) 모두에서 등급II(Grade II)에 비해 등급 III(Grade III)에서 부하량이 유의하게 높게 나타났다(p<.05). 위 결과로부터 위팔어깨관절(glenohumeral joint)의 아래, 앞, 뒤 방향에 대한 미끄러뜨림(gliding) II/III 적용 시 같은 등급에서 적용되는 힘의 크기가 방향과 성별에 따라 다름을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kaltenborn FM, "Manual Mobilization of the Extremity Joints", Oslo Norway:Olaf Norlis Bokhandel, 1989.
  2. Maitland, "Peripheral manipulation", Butterworth-Heinemann, 1991.
  3. Kisner C, Colby L, "Therapeutic exercise", F.A. Davis Company, 2007.
  4. Kaltenborn, "Manual mobilization of the extremity joints", Olaf Norlis Bokhandel, Norway, 1989.
  5. Kaltenborn FM, "The Spine; Basic Evaluation and Mobilization Technique", pp.24, 1993.
  6. Kirstukas JS, Backman AJ, "Physician-applied contact pressure and table force response during unilateral thoracic manipulation", J Manipulative Physiol Ther, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp.269-279, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-4754(99)70059-X
  7. Waddington J, Lau G, Adam R, "Manual application of controlled forces to thoracic and lumbar spine with a device: rated comfort for the reciever's back and the applier's hands", J Manipulative Physiol Ther, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp.365-373, 1999.
  8. Kaltenborn, "The spine", Olaf Norlis Bokhandel, Norway, 1993.
  9. Jack H. Wilmore, David L. Costill, "Physiology of sport and exercise", Human kinetics, 1996.
  10. Zhu X, Huang F, "Biomechanical evaluation of glenohumeral ligament in holding anterior stability of shoulder joint", Chinese Journal of reperative and reconstructive surgery, Nov;21(11), pp.1175-8, 2007.
  11. Curl LA, Warren RF. "Glenohumeral joint stability: Selective cutting studies on the static capsular restraints" Clin Orthop Relat Res. Sep;(330), pp.54-65, 1996.
  12. Ricardo Cuéllar , Javier Gonzállez , and Jaime Usabiaga . "A Study of Diagnostic Reliability in Inferior Shoulder Instability: Measurement of Inferior Humeral Displacement Using Arthroscopy", The J of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol. 18, No. 3 (March), pp.287-291, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1053/jars.2002.30042
  13. Raymond Lee, John Evans, "An invivo study of the intervertebral movements produced by posteroanterior mobilization", Clin. Biomech. Vol. 12, No. 6, pp.400-408, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(97)00019-3
  14. Plafcan DM, Turczany PJ, Guenin BA, Kegerreis S, Worrell TW,"An objective measurement technique for posterior scapular displacement", J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, May;25(5), pp.336-41, 1997. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1997.25.5.336
  15. Suzanne J. Snodgrass, Darren A. Rivett, Val J. Robertson, Elizabeth Stojanovski, "Cervical spine mobilization forces applied by physiotherapy students", Physiotherapy, 96, pp.120-129, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2009.08.008
  16. Cheng SC, Hulse D, Fairbairn KJ, Clarke M, Wallace WA, "Comparison of dynamic ultrasound and stress radiology for assessment of inferior glenohumeral laxity in asymptomatic shoulders", Skeletal Radiol, 37, pp.161-168, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-007-0401-8
  17. Suzanne J. Snodgrass, MMedSc(Physio), Darren A. Rivett, Val J. Robertson, "Manual forces applied during posterior-to-anterior spinal mobilization:a review of the evidence", J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 29, pp.316-329, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.03.006

Cited by

  1. Effects of Cervical Joint Mobilization on the Forward Head Posture and Neck Disability Indexes vol.8, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2014.8.2.89
  2. The effects of Upper Thoracic Joint Mobilization Technique using Kaltenborn-Evjenth concept on Cervicothoracic ROM and Pain in patients with Chronic Neck Pain vol.9, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2015.9.7.479