DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of field location and spray device on pesticide residue in chilli peppers

농약 살포조건이 고추열매 중 잔류에 미치는 영향

  • Son, Kyeong-Ae (National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kang, Tae-Kyeong (National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Park, Byeong-Jun (Internaitonal Technology Cooperation Center, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Taek-Kyum (National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Gil, Geun-Hwan (National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Chan-Sub (National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Bae (National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Im, Geon-Jae (National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Key-Woon (Applied Biology and Chemistry Division, Kyungpook National University)
  • 손경애 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 강태경 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 박병준 (농촌진흥청 국제협력과) ;
  • 김택겸 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 길근환 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 김찬섭 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 김진배 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 임건재 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 이기운 (경북대학교 농업생명과학대학)
  • Received : 2012.06.26
  • Accepted : 2012.08.22
  • Published : 2012.09.30

Abstract

This study was carried out to clarify effects of field location and sprayer on the level of pesticide residue in chilli peppers. As confirmed by statistical analysis, the residue levels in green pepper among three greenhouses did not show significant difference at the first day after spraying with the same engine sprayer and nozzle. But the residue levels in green peppers collected from the exposed outside of crop were 2 times higher than those from the hidden inside. The sampling site was one of variation elements of pesticide residue. The residue levels after application by knapsack engine powered sprayer were 1.7 times higher than those by manual compressed sprayer. As the spraying pressure of the engine power sprayer is 2 times higher than the commonly used pressure of the manual compressed sprayer, the pressure of the sprayer and nozzles were considered to affect on the residue levels in peppers.

본 실험은 포장과 살포기의 차이가 고추 열매 중 농약 잔류량에 미치는 영향을 구명하고자 하였다. 위치가 다른 세 농가 포장에서 비슷한 시기에 정식한 고추를 대상으로 동일한 분무기와 노즐로 약제 처리 후 1일차의 농약 잔류량은 통계처리로 확인하여 차이가 없었다. 시료 채취시 고추나무 외부의 고추 중 잔류량은 내부의 고추 보다 2배 이상 많아 시료 채취의 위치가 고추 중 잔류량 변이의 요인이 되었다. 배부식 동력분무기와 압축식 인력분무기 사용에 따른 농약잔류량 차이는 동력분무기가 인력분무기를 사용할 때 보다 1.7배 높은 잔류농도를 보였는데 이는 약제 살포시 인력분무기의 상용압력보다 2배 정도 높은 동력분무기 압력과 노즐의 영향으로 판단되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ambrus, A. (2000) Within and between field variety of residue data and sampling implications. Food Addit. Contam. 17:512-537.
  2. Chatzicharisis, I., T. Thomidis, C. Tsipouridis, E. Mourkidou- Papadopoulou and Z. Vryzas (2012) Residues of six pesticides in fresh peach-nectarine fruits after preharvest treatment. Phytoparasitica. DOI 10.1007/s12600-012-0231-7.
  3. Cho, M. R., H. Y. Jeon and S. Y. Na (2000) Occurrence of Frankliniella occidentalis and Tereanychus urticae in rose greenhouse and effectiveness of different control methods. Journal of Bio-Environment Control. 9:179-184.
  4. Chung, C. J., H. J. Kim, S. I. Cho, Y. S. Choi and J. S. Choe (1995) Design factors of boom sprayer (I). Journal of Biosystems Engineering. 20:217-225.
  5. Chung, C. J., S. O. Chung, Y. C. Chang, Y. S. Choi and J. S. Choe (1997) A study on development of a pneumatic granular applicator for paddy field (I). Journal of Biosystems Engineering. 22:127-136.
  6. Eun, S.-W. (2001) Characteristics of pesticide residues in Paprika by different application methods. Kyungpook National University.
  7. Julian, S. H., J. R. Vitor, P. Francisco and F. Milagros (2012) Comparative spray deposits by manually pulled trolley sprayer and a spray gun in greenhouse tomato crops. Crop Protection. 31:119-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.10.007
  8. Kang, T. G., D. H. Lee, C. S. Lee, G. I. Lee, W. K. Choi and S. Y. No (2004a) Spray and depositional characteristics of electrostatic nozzles for orchard sprayers. Journal of Biosystems Engineering. 29:21-28. https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2004.29.1.021
  9. Kang, T.-G. (2004b) Development of electrostatic spraying system for orchard sprayer. Chungbuk National University.
  10. Kim, T. H., I. J. Jang and C. T. Kang (1999) Development of a self-travelling sprayer for a greenhouse(I). Journal of Biosystems Engineering. 24:209-216.
  11. Koo, Y. M., B. S. Shin and S. H. Lim (2001) Size distribution of droplets sprayed by an orchard sprayer. Journal of Biosystems Engineering. 26:431-440.
  12. Lee, H. (2009) Persistence of pesticide residues in crops applied by foliar spray and removal effect by home preparations. Kyungpook National University.
  13. Maclachlan, D. J. and D. Hamilton (2009) A new tool for the evaluation of crop residue trial data (day-zero-plus decline). Food Additives and Contaminants. 1-18 iFirst.
  14. Moritz, K. (1994) Effect of droplet size and carrier volume on performance of foliage-applied herbicides. Crop Protection. 13:163-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-2194(94)90075-2
  15. Motokazu, T. and K. Yoshinori (2000) Spray ununiformity observed in nozzle motion spraying pesticide on eggplants. Pesticide Science Society of Japan. 25:223-227. https://doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.25.223
  16. Yu, B. K., J. T. Chang, T. G. Kang and S. S. Yun (1997) Development of electric motor driven single wheel vertical boom sprayer for greenhouse. RDA. J. Farm Manage. & Agri-Engi. 39:62-68.
  17. Japan Plant Protection Association (2006) Symposium Lectures abstracts 'Considering solution to the drift'.

Cited by

  1. Deposit Amounts of Dithianone on Citrus leaves by Different Spray Methods vol.20, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7585/kjps.2016.20.1.1
  2. Comparison of Citrus Leaves Adhesion and Operator Exposure of Fungicide Dithianon by Different Spraying System vol.21, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7585/kjps.2017.21.2.131
  3. 소면적 재배 작물 들깻잎 중 살충제 Bifenthrin과 Chlorfenapyr의 잔류양상 vol.34, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5338/kjea.2015.34.3.29