Korean Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (한국수산과학회지)

The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science (한국수산과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Biofiltration Efficiency of Saccharina japonica for Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA)

다영양입체양식을 위한 다시마(Saccharina japonica)의 생물여과효과

  • Park, Mi-Seon (East Sea Fisheries Research Institute, National Fisheries Research & Development Institute) ;
  • Min, Byung-Hwa (East Sea Fisheries Research Institute, National Fisheries Research & Development Institute) ;
  • Kim, Young-Dae (East Sea Fisheries Research Institute, National Fisheries Research & Development Institute) ;
  • Yoo, Hyun-Il (Seaweed Research Center, National Fisheries Research & Development Institute)
  • 박미선 (국립수산과학원 동해수산연구소) ;
  • 민병화 (국립수산과학원 동해수산연구소) ;
  • 김영대 (국립수산과학원 동해수산연구소) ;
  • 유현일 (국립수산과학원 해조류바이오연구센터)
  • Received : 2012.03.08
  • Accepted : 2012.08.03
  • Published : 2012.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To determine whether the seaweed Saccharina japonica can effectively utilize dissolved nutrients from Sebastes schlegeli fish cultures, a laboratory experiment was conducted in a static system for 7 days at ESFRI, NFRDI in Korea. The experiment included an S. schlegeli monoculture system and an S. schlegeli-S. japonica IMTA system. Saccharina schlegeli density ($415{\pm}24g$; mean${\pm}$SE) remained the same in all treatments, whereas seaweed density varied across treatments of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 kg (control and T1-T4, respectively). During the experiment, nutrient ($NH_4^+$ and $PO_4^{3-}$) concentrations were measured at 24-h intervals. $NH_4^+$ concentration of the control group increased from $0.117{\pm}0.021mg/L$ at the start of experiment to $5.836{\pm}0.904mg/L$ at the end of experiment. $NH_4^+$ concentrations of each treatment were $3.004{\pm}0.040$, $2.086{\pm}0.133$, $1.642{\pm}0.121$ and $0.775{\pm}0.007mg/L$ in T1, T2, T3, and T4, respectively, at the end of experiment. The concentration of $PO_4^{3-}$ exhibited a similar trend to $NH_4^+$ concentration. $NH_4^+$ and $PO_4^{3-}$ concentrations significantly decreased with increased S. japonica thallus density each day (P<0.05). The nutrient removal efficiency (NRE) and nutrient uptake rate (NUR) showed different relationships with changes in thallus density; NRE increased but NUR decreased as thallus density increased. Based on measured concentrations of $NH_4^+$ and S. japonica weight, regression analysis defined the relationship between as an exponential function, $Y=3.8165e^{-0.505X}$ ($R^2$ = 0.9552). Our results demonstrated that S. japonica can function as an efficient component in IMTA with environmental and potentially economic benefits for fish hatcheries.

Keywords

References

  1. Abreu MH, Varela DA, Henriquez L, Villarroel A, Yarish C, Sousa-Pinto I and Buschmann AH. 2009. Traditional vs. integrated multi-trophic aquaculture of Gracilaria chilensis Bird CJ, McLachlan J and Oliveira EC. productivity and physiological performance. Aquacult 293, 211-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.03.043
  2. Abreu MH, Pereira R, Yarish C, Buschmann AH and Sousa- Pinto I. 2011. IMTA with Gracilaria vermiculophylla: productivity and nutrient removal performance of the seaweed in a land- based pilot scale system. Aquacult 312, 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.12.036
  3. Bolton JJ, Robertson-Andersson DV, Shuuluka D and Kandjengo L. 2009. Growing Ulva (Chlorophyta) in integrated systems as a commercial crop for abalone feed in South Africa: a SWOT analysis. J Appl Phycol 21, 575-583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-008-9385-6
  4. Buschmann AH, Hernandez-Gonzalez MC, Aranda C, Chopin T, Neori A, Halling C and Troell M. 2008. Mariculture waste management. In: Jorgensen SE and Fath BD (Eds.), Ecological Engineering : Encyclopedia of Ecology 5 vols. Elsevier, Oxford, U.K., 2211-2217.
  5. Buschmann AH, Hernandez-Gonzalez MC, Flores R, Gutierrez A, Varela D and Huovinen P. 2010. Massive kelp production in Chile: future prospects, challenges and limitations. XXth International Seaweed Symposium book of abstracts, Ensenada, Mexico, 51.
  6. Buschmann AH, Troell M and Kautsky N. 2001. Integrated algal farming: a review. Cah Biol Mar 42, 83-90.
  7. Cao L, Wang W, Yang Y, Yang V, Yuan Z, Xiong S and Diana J. 2007. Environmental Impact of Aquaculture and Countermeasures to Aquaculture Pollution in China. Env Sci Pollut Res 14, 452-462. https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2007.05.426
  8. Chopin T, Robinson SMC, Troell M, Neori A, Buschmann AH and Fang J. 2008. Multitrophic integration for sustainable marine aquaculture. In: Jorgensen SE and Fath BD (Eds.), Ecological Engineering. : Encyclopedia of Ecology 5 vols. Elsevier, Oxford, U.K., 2463-2475.
  9. Costa-Pierce B. 2010. Sustainable ecological aquaculture systems: the need for a new social contract for aquaculture development. Mar Tech Soc J 44, 88-112. https://doi.org/10.4031/MTSJ.44.3.3
  10. De Casabianca ML, Laugier T and Marinho-Soriano E. 1997. Seasonal changes of nutrients in water and sediment in a Mediterranean lagoon with shellfish farming activity (Thau Lagoon, France). ICES J Mar Sci 54, 905-916. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1996.0201
  11. FAO. 2010. FAO State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2010. Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Rome. Italy
  12. Goldman JC, Tenore RK, Ryther HJ and Corwin N. 1974. Inorganic nitrogen removal in a combined tertiary treatmentmarine aquaculture system. I. Removal efficiences. Water Res 8, 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(74)90007-4
  13. Hayashi L, Yokoya NS, Ostini S, Pereira RT, Braga ES and Oliveira EC. 2008 Nutrients removed by Kappaphycus alvarezii (Rhodophyta, Solieriaceae) in integrated cultivation with fishes in recirculating water. Aquacult 277, 185-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.02.024
  14. Hernandez I, Martinez-Aragon JF, Tovar A, Perez-Llorens JL and Vergara JJ. 2002. Biofiltering efficiency in removal of dissolved nutrients by three species of estuarine macroalgae cultivated with sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) waste waters 2. Ammonium. J Appl Phycol 14, 375-384. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022178417203
  15. Holmer M, Hansen PK, Karakassis I, Borg JA and Schembri PJ. 2008. Monitoring of environmental impacts of marine aquaculture. In: Holmer, M., Black, K., Duarte, C.M., Marba, N., Karakassis, I. (Eds.), Aquaculture in the Ecosystem. Springer, USA, 47-85.
  16. Kang YH, Park SR and Chung IK. 2011. Biofiltration efficiency and biochemical composition of three seaweed species cultivated in a fish-seaweed integrated culture. Algae 26, 97-108.
  17. Lander T, Barrington K, Robinson S, MacDonald B and Martin J. 2004. Dynamics of the blue mussel as an extractive organism in an integrated multi-trophic aquaculture system. Bull Aquacult Assoc Can 104, 19-28.
  18. Littler MM and Littler DS. 1984. Relationships between macroalgal functional form groups and substrate stability in a subtropical rocky intertidal system. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 74, 13-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(84)90035-2
  19. Martinez-Aragon JE, Hernandez I, Perez-Liorens JL, Vazquez R and Vergara JJ. 2002. Biofiltering efficiency in removal of dissolved nutrients by three species of estuarine macroalgae cultivated with sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) waste waters, 1. Phosphate. J Appl Phycol 14, 365-374. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022134701273
  20. Mao Y, Yang H, Zhou Y, Ye N and Fang J. 2009. Potential of the seaweed Gracilaria lemaneiformis for integrated multitrophic aquaculture with scallop Chlamys farreri in north China. J Appl Phycol 21, 649-656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-008-9398-1
  21. Mayadi L. 2003. Nitrogen Budget in Sea Bass (Lates calcarifer Bloch) Culture With Different Level Protein Diets. Master Thesis, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  22. Mendiguchia C, Moreno C, Manuel-Vez MP and Garcia-Vargas M. 2006. Preliminary investigation on the enrichment of heavy metals in marine sediments originated from intensive aquaculture effluents. Aquacult 254, 317-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.10.049
  23. Mente E, Pierce PJ, Santos MB and Neofitou C. 2006. Effect of feed and feeding in the culture of salmonids on the marine aquatic environment: a synthesis for European aquaculture. Aquacul Internat 14, 499-522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-006-9051-4
  24. Naylor R, Goldburg R, Primavera J, Kautsky N, Beveridge M, Clay J, Folke C, Lubchenco J, Mooney H and Troell M. 2000. Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405, 1017-1024. https://doi.org/10.1038/35016500
  25. Neori A, Chopin T, Troell M, Buschmann AH, Kraemer GP, Halling C, Shpigel M and Yarish V. 2004. Integrated aquaculture: rationale, evolution and state of the art emphasizing seaweed biofiltration in modern mariculture. Aquacult 231, 361-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.11.015
  26. Neori A, Shpigel M and Ben-Ezra D. 2000. A sustainable integrated system for culture of fish, seaweed and abalone. Aquacult 186, 279-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00378-6
  27. Neori A, Troell M, Chopin T, Yarish C, Critchley A and Buschmann A. 2007. The need for a balanced ecosystem approach to Blue Revolution Aquaculture. Environment 49, 38-42.
  28. Ryther JH, Goldman JC, Gifford CE, Huguenin JE, Wing AS, Clarner JP, Williams LD and Lapointe BE. 1975. Physical models of integrated waste recycling-marine polyculture systems. Aquacult 5, 163-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(75)90096-4
  29. Sanderson JC, Cromey CJ, Dring MJ and Kelly MS. 2008. Distribution of nutrients for seaweed cultivation around salmon cages at farm sites in north-west Scotland. Aquacult 278, 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.03.027
  30. Skriptsova AV and Miroshnikova NV. 2011. Laboratory experiment to determine the potential of two macroalgae from the Russian Far-East as biofilters for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA). Bioresour Technol 102, 3149-3154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.093
  31. Strickland JDH and Parsons TR. 1972. A Practical Handbook of Sea Water Analysis. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 1-311.
  32. Troell M, Halling C and Neori A. 2003. Integrated mariculture: Asking the right questions. Aquacult 226, 69-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00469-1
  33. Troell M, Ronnback P, Halling C, Kautsky N and Buschmann A. 1999. Ecological engineering in aquaculture: use of seaweeds for removing nutrients from intensive mariculture. J Appl Phycol 11, 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008070400208
  34. Wallentinus I. 1984. Comparisons of nutrient uptake rates for Baltic macroalgae with different thallus morphologies. Mar Biol 80, 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02180189
  35. Wu R. 1995. The environmental impact of marine fish culture: Towards a sustainable future. Mar Poll Bull 31, 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-326X(95)00100-2
  36. Wu CY, Zhang YX, Li RZ, Penc ZS, Zhang YF, Liu QC, Zhang JP and Fang X. 1984. Utilization of ammonium- nitrogen by Porphyra yezoensis and Gracilaria verrucosa. Hydrobiologia 116/117, 475-477. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027726
  37. Wurts WA. 2000. Sustainable aquaculture in the twenty-first century. Rev Fish Sci 8, 141-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641260091129206
  38. Zhou Y, Yang H, Hu H, Liu Y, Mao Y, Zhou H, Xu X and Zhang F. 2006. Bioremediation potential of the macroalga Gracilaria lemaneiformis (Rhodophyta) integrated into fed fish culture in coastal waters of north China. Aquacult 252, 264-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.06.046